Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Singing and emotion

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Music and mood[edit source]

Interesting topic - I watched this video and took away quite a bit from it. Might be useful for you to take a look at, it focuses on how music can affect our moods. How Does Music Affect Your Mood | Music and the Brain

Kind regards, Alyssa --Alyssa.marin (discusscontribs) 13:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Initial suggestions[edit source]

@U3213084: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

Let me know if I can do anything else as you go along. Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:02, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Singing to the sea[edit source]

I listened to this fascinating podcast today - about the role of Indigenous Australian singing in relationship to land/sea and how it has served as evidence in court: https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/lawreport/singing-to-the-sea/14101652 Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:10, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Singing and communication[edit source]

Hey I came across this great research journal about singing and how that is used as a form of communication and expressing our emotion,

https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/52737187/Singing_as_communication20170421-3115-fpx65c-libre.pdf?1492768774=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DSinging_as_communication.pdf&Expires=1692453583&Signature=hDcam1VUYV9dZUJTAFFIwkc7urZ3PD4QyvfGcySumVRXDcHvXfCL2ejZ-fnrPdZ1gkgzMfYF2Cw4ojdRSfdL2QzTQdQ2cOsFG5Vl2oqs7BugJEDomI-fbmCi3AMFhmYFjccxL4Bo1WOE~Q4xLkkaw~nHUn4dMHm21GA-os~Bh-OI3yMTCIgUflXMXn2jBUQ6DMQHboIT1Ks7-6s-qf-gnX2IxeT5RMIxyuZzfQpiZ1vRs52oq8CAMDw4FE5iAZxqYx7HGwC60YwCWnC55dnaAHxo4B3303mFj9EdQOsEuVjHL82VcVd14MCIoXpoi4tfbR93MD8QbKUSdXom~f7jTw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA

I found it very interesting to read, and hope it helps ~~~ U3162169T (discusscontribs) 13:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

Title[edit source]

  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted

Headings[edit source]

  1. Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic

Overview[edit source]

  1. Add a scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) at the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  2. Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic. Move details into a subsequent question.
  3. Consider closer alignment between the focus questions and top-level headings

Key points[edit source]

  1. Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
  2. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research, with practical examples
  3. Consider embedding inter-wiki links to relevant book chapters such as listed here: Motivation and emotion/Book/Music
  4. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Underway

Figure[edit source]

  1. Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited

Learning feature[edit source]

  1. Promising use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc.

References[edit source]

  1. Good
  2. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. italicisation
    2. doi formatting
    3. make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
    4. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)

Resources[edit source]

  1. Very good
  2. Only select the top, most relevant links related to the psychology of singing and emotion

User page[edit source]

  1. Very good
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:09, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Book chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. Excellent use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims
  3. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits

Overview[edit source]

  1. Well developed
  2. Engages reader interest by presenting a case study and/or scenario with an image in a feature box
  3. Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon
  4. Clear focus questions

Theory[edit source]

  1. An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained
  2. Builds effectively on related chapters and Wikipedia articles
  3. Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies)
  4. Effective use of tables, figures, and/or lists are to help clearly convey key theoretical information
  5. Key citations are well used
  6. Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts

Research[edit source]

  1. Excellent review of relevant research
  2. Excellent critical thinking about relevant research is evident
  3. Claims are referenced

Integration[edit source]

  1. Excellent integration between theory and research

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. Very good summary and conclusion
  2. Remind the reader about the importance of the problem or phenomenon of interest
  3. Key points are well summarised
  4. Addresses the focus questions
  5. Add practical, take-home message(s)

Style[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent
    1. Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead:
      1. it is, most often, not needed at all, or
      2. use section linking
    2. Embed direct quotes within sentences and paragraphs, rather than presenting them holus-bolus. Even better, communicate the concept in your own words.
  1. Layout
    1. The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections
  2. Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are excellent
  1. APA style
    1. Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc.
    2. Use serial commas[1]. See explanatory video (1 min)
    3. Figures
      1. Figures are very well captioned
      2. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text
    4. Tables
      1. Table captions use APA style or wiki style
      2. Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style
    5. Citations use correct APA style
    6. References use almost correct APA style
      1. Use full journal titles

Learning features[edit source]

  1. Excellent
  2. Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles
  3. Basic use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Excellent/ use of image(s)
  5. Very good use of table(s)
  6. Excellent use of feature box(es)
  7. Excellent use of case studies or examples
  8. Basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
  9. Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
    1. Use alphabetical order
  10. Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section
    1. Use alphabetical order

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~16 logged, useful, minor to major social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:24, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent presentation

Overview[edit source]

  1. An opening slide with the sub-title is displayed and narrated. Also display and narrate the title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation and to be consistent with the book chapter.
  2. Very engaging introduction to hook audience interest
  3. A context for the presentation is clearly established
  4. Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented

Content[edit source]

  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation addresses the topic
  3. An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
  4. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory
  5. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological research
  6. Consider including key citations to support claims
  7. The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice
  8. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. A Conclusion is presented with clear take-home message(s)
  2. The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit
  3. The Conclusion did not fit within the time limit

Audio[edit source]

  1. The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to
  2. The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio
  3. Audio communication is well paced
  4. The narration is well practiced and/or performed
  5. Audio recording quality was excellent
  6. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic (see content)

Video[edit source]

  1. Overall, visual display quality is excellent
  2. The presentation makes creative use of webcam (great lighting, background) and stock video
  3. The presentation is very well produced
  4. The visual content is well matched to the target topic (see content)

Meta-data[edit source]

  1. The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. A written description of the presentation is provided
  3. Links to and from the book chapter are provided
  4. An active hyperlink to the book chapter is provided

Licensing[edit source]

  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply