Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Psychedelic treatment of anxiety

Added useful links

Hi @Sasha-160499: for my social contribution I have added some useful links under the Psychedelics and anxiety section of your chapter. I am focusing on a similar topic and I found these to be extremely informative and interesting articles. I hope you find them useful too! The articles are "Analysis of Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy in Medicine: A Narrative Review", "Developing Guidelines and Competencies for the Training of Psychedelic Therapists", and "Learning to Let Go: A Cognitive-Behavioral Model of How Psychedelic Therapy Promotes Acceptance". Looking forward to reading your chapter! --SammyTabrett (discuss • contribs) 07:26, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Initial suggestions

@Sasha-160499: Thanks for tackling this topic.

Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other chapters (Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Anxiety and Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Drugs) and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work.

Let me know if I can do anything else as you go along.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:52, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Case study suggestions

Hi @Sasha-160499: I really like where this is headed so far, particularly how you plan to interweave the case study throughout. If you can find something appropriate, maybe you can make the case studies more engaging by adding a small icon in the corner of each one that aligns with its topic/focus? --U3213682 (discuss • contribs) 06:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Edits

Hi Sasha, I just wanted to let you know that I have edited one of your headings as per a suggestion from James on my own page where the headings should be written in sentence casing. This means only the first letter should be in a capital letter, the rest in lower cases. For example: What are Psychedelics should be What are psychadelics. I'll leave you to edit the rest of your headings! Good luck with the assignment! Laura --Lauraei11 (discuss • contribs) 09:36, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Basic, 1-level heading structure – would benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure Focus on global perspective, although Australia could be used as a case study (but remove heading) There is not enough in the headings about P and A - it focuses on P Overview Good start; needs work Move scenario to top; consider adding an image to help attract reader interest Zero in more quickly on P and A - rather than spending too much time on A The last focus question is suitable; consider revising the first three because there are too broad. Focus on P and A. Key points Problematic due to insufficient focus on P and A; almost exclusively focuses on P Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) Figure A relevant figure is presented and captioned Cite each figure at least once in the main text Learning feature Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Consider including more quiz question(s), table(s) etc. References Very good For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Resources See also Excellent External links Excellent User page Used effectively Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:49, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. Well over the maximum word count. The content beyond 4,000 words (i.e., See also, References, and External links) has been ignored for marking purposes. Overview Well developed Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon Engages reader interest by introducing a case study and/or example Clear focus question(s) Ideally, provide open-ended, rather than closed-ended focus questions Theory A very good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained More info about the research for each of the theories would be helpful The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters) Very good/ depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Basic use of tables and/or lists are to help clearly convey key theoretical information Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Very good review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Greater emphasis on effect sizes could be helpful. Excellent critical thinking about relevant research is evident Claims are referenced Integration Very good integration between theory and research The research seems to mostly focus on outcomes rather than testing theory Conclusion Excellent, balanced summary and conclusion Key points are well summarised Clear take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good; however, the chapter is over the word count Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead: it is, most often, not needed at all, or use section linking Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes "People" is often a better term than "individuals" Use permanent, rather than relative, time references. For example, instead of "20 years ago", refer to something like "at the beginning of the 21st century". In this way, the text will survive better into the future, without needing to be rewritten. Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Proofreading More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) Remove unnecessary capitalisation Figures Figures are well captioned Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text Tables Use APA style for captions. See example Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example: Remove commas after et al. when the publication year is in parentheses References use almost correct APA style Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Learning features Good use of learning features No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Very good use of image(s) Basic use of table(s) Very good use of feature box(es) Very good/use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Excellent use of case studies or examples Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Very good use of external links in the "External links" section Social contribution ~3 logged, useful, minor to moderate social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:00, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a good presentation The presentation is over the maximum time limit — content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation Also narrate the title and sub-title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological research Ideally, make more explicit use of research Some citations are included to support claims Consider including more key citations to support claims The presentation makes very good use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information Conclusion The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages in response to each focus question The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit The Conclusion did not fit within the time limit Audio The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio Audio communication is well paced Very good intonation The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was OK. It is hard to hear at the beginning of each slide. Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic (see content) but lacked synthesis of the best psychological research about this topic Video Overall, visual display quality is good The presentation makes reasonably good use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read Consider using a sans-serif typeface to make the text easier to read The amount of text presented on the theory slide could be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a good way by images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic (see content) but lacked synthesis of the best psychological research about this topic Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. Links to and from the book chapter are provided An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to advanced features Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)