Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.
Keep the definitional background material relatively brief (e.g., types of motivation only matters if they are subsequently used to help understand the relationship between PAT and EM)
Consider building out the heading structure for the most important section (e.g., The quantified self with exercise motivation).
Consider rephrasing more top-level headings as questions
Consider adopting closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
Basic development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
Theories are well selected but not sufficiently apply to PAT and EM
Significant expansion of the "The quantified self with exercise motivation is recommended in order to address the topic. Use the best available psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples.
Conclusion (the most important section):
Underway
What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or specific focus questions about PAT and EM?)
Very brief description about self provided – consider expanding
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
At least three different types of contributions; some link(s) are indirect
If adding the second or subsequent link to a page (or a talk/discussion page), create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
This chapter "beats around the bush" for ~2,000 words (i.e., too much preamble) before starting to directly tackle the target topic in the section titled "How does the quantified self intertwine with exercise motivation?". The content is this section is the best content of the whole chapter. There needs to be more of it.
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
Insufficient use of relevant psychological theory about this topic
The chapter provides relatively too much discussion of general theory
Overly focused on definitions and general theoretical background; instead summarise, link to related resources, and move to the more substantive aspects of theory
Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters)
Insufficient depth is provided about relevant theory(ies)
No use of relevant tables, figures, and/or lists are to help clearly convey key theoretical information
Lack of sufficient use of the most relevant academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
The Reeve (2018) textbook is overused as a citation – instead, utilise primary, peer-reviewed sources
Insufficient use of examples to illustrate relevant theoretical concepts
Overall, the quality of written expression is basic
Avoid starting sentences with a citation unless the author is particularly pertinent. Instead, it is more interesting for the the content/key point to be communicated, with the citation included along the way or, more typically, in parentheses at the end of the sentence.
Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes
APA style
Direct quotes need page numbers – even better, write in your own words
>
Figures
Figures are well captioned
Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1)
Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example:
If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either:
in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or
in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020)
References are not in full APA style. For example:
One use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Basic use of image(s)
No use of table(s)
Reasonably good use of feature box(es)
Basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
Insufficient use of relevant case studies or examples
Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
The presentation addresses the topic
An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological theory, but is overly focused on general motivational theory - concentrate on theory that specifically helps to understand how self-tracking can influence exercise motivation
The presentation makes implied use of relevant psychological research; ideally make more explicit use of research
Include citations to support claims
The presentation makes basic use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice
The presentation provides easy to understand information
The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to
The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio
Audio communication is well paced
Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement
The narration is well practiced and/or performed
Audio recording quality was excellent
The narrated content is reasonably well matched to the target topic (see content) but is a general overview rather than synthesising the best psychological theory and research
The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides
The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams
The presentation is very well produced
The visual content is reasonably well matched to the target topic (see content) but is a general overview rather than synthesising the best psychological theory and research
The chapter sub-title but not the chapter title is used in the name of the presentation. The title would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
A very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand.