Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
You have done a really great job, this topic seems really interesting!
I really like the way you have set it out - it flows really nicely and is quite easy to read with the indentations at each paragraph.
Your images are also very interactive and engaging.
Amazing work!
--U3213910 (discuss • contribs) 09:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Amazing work! This is such an interesting topic, I love reading about this topic in psychology! I read a journal that goes over depression and anxiety through the perspective of sport psychology and injuries. I think it would be super helpful - Self-Reported Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety After ACL Injury: A Systematic Review doi: 10.1177/23259671211066493 - Grace U3210285 (discuss • contribs) 12:36, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.
Description about self provided – consider expanding
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
At least one contribution has been made and summarised with indirect link(s) to evidence
If adding the second or subsequent link to a page (or a talk/discussion page), create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is a promising chapter, with lots of useful detail, but is hampered by the lack of citation and review of relevant research about emotional aspects of long-term injury in high performance athletes. The chapter tends to rely on application of general psychological principles.
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
A very good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained
Minimise general theoretical background; instead summarise, link to related resources, and move to the more substantive aspects of theory which address the topic (long-term injury in high performance athletes and emotion)
Builds on one previous, related chapter
Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters)
Very good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies)
Effective/ use of tables, figures, and/or lists are to help clearly convey key theoretical information
Lack of sufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
Some basic examples to illustrate theoretical concepts
Good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
One use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Good use of image(s)
No use of table(s)
Very good use of feature box(es)
Basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
The quiz question could be improved by being more focused on the key points and/or take-home messages
Basic use of case studies or examples
Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
This presentation could be improved by displaying and narrating a slide with the same title and sub-title as the book chapter to help the viewer understand the purpose of the presentation
This presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest
Use international statistics because the audience is international. Australians represent ~0.3% of the world population (i.e., very small/narrow audience)
Establish a context for the presentation (e.g., by using an example or explaining why it is important), to help the viewer understand
Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.
The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
Provide an informative description to help viewers decide whether they want to watch