Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Learning motivation and chatbots

Initial suggestions

@Ashhstarr: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• When I was a kid, this helped me learn maths: Little Professor
• This is a cutting edge topic, and may be necessarily somewhat exploratory, but there is a lot of research work going on as we speak
• Consider perhaps possible pros and cons of chatbots for learning motivation (could be a table)
• Probably the best known current educational chatbot is through Khan Academy - that perhaps could make a useful case study
• Consider using genAI to help guide your thinking about this topic
• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Education
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Motivation
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Technology
• What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand? What is the main research in this area?

Let me know if I can do anything else as you go along. Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:35, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Feedback and suggestions

Hello! I really enjoyed reading your chapter, I think you found some really interesting examples about the positive effects of AI in education. I have some suggestions that I think may really strengthen your piece:

I think that incorporating more peer reviewed sources whenever you state "research/ studies say..". This adjustment will bring a lot of value to an already great piece. I have included some suggestions for where you can include the references.

There are also some areas of the text that could use further explanation such as in the motivated learning section.

Otherwise, such a well done job! Goodluck with your assignment :)

--Dnamynts (discuss • contribs) 16:19, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

I came across this interesting article which may help you with your chapter

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X23000073 Very interesting topic! --U3168525 (discuss • contribs) 00:45, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Thankyou so much! 106.69.211.68 (discuss) 03:09, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Khan Academy

Suggested talk: How AI could save (not destroy) education -- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:04, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Thankyou!! 106.69.211.68 (discuss) 02:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I came across, The Impact of Chatbot-Based Learning on Students’ Learning Motivation and Performance ,which may help your chapter Sincerely Giovanni

Heading casing

FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development Overview Put the scenario at the start into a feature box with the image to help attract reader interest Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic Focus questions are probably overly complicated Avoid double-barrelled questions (e.g,. split into separate questions) I think the figure is a symbolic rather than technical representation Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations Strive to identify the most recent relevant citations Promising balance of theory and research Conclusion (the most important section): Well developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) Figure A relevant figure is presented See earlier comment about caption which could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text Learning feature Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of table(s) Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s) etc. References Excellent For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation Resources Excellent User page Created – minimal, but sufficient Very brief description about self provided – consider expanding Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a reasonably good chapter. It makes good use of psychological theory but limited use of research to help address a real-world phenomenon or problem. Well under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Solid Briefly engages reader interest by introducing a case study and/or scenario with an image in a feature box The scenario could be expanded Provides a reasonably good explanation of the problem or phenomenon Reasonable focus questions; could be more targetted to unpack the topic: "How can student motivation to learn be enhanced by using artificial intelligence chatbots?" Theory A reasonably good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters) Basic depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Lack of sufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Some use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Basic review of relevant research Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Greater emphasis on effect sizes could be helpful. Lack of sufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Basic critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Many claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the tags) Integration Reasonably good integration between theory and research Conclusion Reasonably good summary and conclusion Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is reasonably good There is no acknowledgement in the edit summary about use of AI content; using AI content without acknowledgement violates academic integrity Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes Layout Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see tags) Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings See earlier comments about heading casing Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Figures Figures are well captioned Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text Tables Use APA style for captions. See example Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text Citations use correct APA style The reference is too short for professional coverage of this topic References use correct APA style References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Check and correct use of italicisation Learning features Basic use of learning features Basic use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Very good use of image(s) Basic use of table(s) Excellent use of feature box(es) Basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Good use of case studies or examples Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Basic use of external links in the "External links" section Social contribution ~3 logged, minor social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:34, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic presentation The presentation is over the maximum time limit — content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes Overview An opening slide with the sub-title is displayed and narrated. Also display and narrate the title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation and to be consistent with the book chapter. Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest A basic context for the topic is established Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation somewhat addresses the topic The presentation argues that learning chatbots help to satisfy autonomy, competence, and relatedness The presentation also argues that learning chatbots provide positive reinforcement No research evidence is presented to support these claims; no examples are provided There is too much content, in too much detail, presented within the allocated time frame. Zoom out and provide a higher-level presentation at a slower pace. It is best to cover a small amount of well-targetted content than a large amount of poorly selected content. The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes no explicit use of relevant psychological research The presentation includes some citations to support claims The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies Conclusion A Conclusion slide is presented with take-home message(s) The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit Audio The audio gets off to a slow start (about 8 seconds in) The presentation makes good use of narrated audio Audio communication is well paced Audio recording quality was excellent The narrated content is partially matched to the target topic (see content) Video Overall, visual display quality is good The presentation makes effective/good/basic use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The visual communication is supplemented in a basic way by images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is partially to the target topic (see content) Meta-data The chapter sub-title but not the chapter title is used in the name of the presentation. The title would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A written description of the presentation is not provided A link to the book chapter is not provided A link from the book chapter is provided The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This introduces limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info. Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are not provided A copyright license for the presentation is not provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:52, 7 November 2023 (UTC)