Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.
Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure
Consider the possibility adopting closer alignment between the focus questions and the top-level headings (although understand it may make more sense to integrate)
Use default heading formatting (i.e., avoid bold, italics, underline, changing the size etc.)
Direct quotes need page numbers; quotes greater than 40 words should be inset (APA style)
Citations should be in alphabetical order (APA style)
What (psychological) theory/research is there about mindfulness, dadirri, Wayapa Wuurrkya, yarning circle etc.? (Where there is insufficient research, point this out, but at least connect to psychological theory). Otherwise, consider treating e.g., Wayapa Wuurrk as a feature box example rather than a core content section.
Move references into the References section. Keep citations in the main body.
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi,
I really enjoyed reading this chapter and think this is such a wonderful topic to write a chapter on.
I have read and made some adjustments to assist in the development of your chapter by adding some clarification templates in areas I thought needed expansion or clarification.
I thought under the mindfulness heading it might be a good idea to provide an example of conventional mindfulness (visulisation exercises, square breathing).
Under the self-determination theory heading it might be useful to provide a short scenario/case study to help explain SDT.
I also noticed that your figures currently don't match the text they are related to. I have added a clarification template in these sections.
I really enjoyed the examples of Aboriginal mindfulness, as this is something I have no previous knowledge on!
Good work on creating such an engaging topic! and please reply if you have any questions about any of the changes U3197031 (discuss • contribs) 04:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi there,
I enjoyed reading your chapter and you have made great progress. I was thinking maybe it would be beneficial if you decrease the amount of focus questions you have? James advised 3-5 focus questions.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a challenging, practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
Over the maximum word count. The content beyond 4000 words has been ignored for marking purposes, so most of the References and the External links aren't considered.
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained
Interesting that SDT is used as a primary theoretical framework. The chapter was ostensibly about "emotion" in relation to Indigenous Australian mindfulness, so it would have been sufficient to concentrate on "mindfulness theory" combined with Indigenous Australian psychology, but the chapter is strengthened by the integrating SDT - well done!
The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory
Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent
Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes
Layout
The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections
Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles
Basic use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Excellent use of image(s)
No use of table(s)
Good use of feature box(es)
Excellent use of quiz(zes)
The quiz questions could be more effective as learning prompts by being embedded as single questions within each corresponding section rather than being presented as a set of questions at the end
Excellent use of case studies or examples
Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
A written description of the presentation is provided