Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey,
Below are some resources that might be useful for the topic. They look at the experience of flow in the workplace from different perspectives.
Ceja, L., & Navarro, J. (2011). Dynamic patterns of flow in the workplace: Characterizing within-individual variability using a complexity science approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(4), 627–651. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.747
Kawalya, C., Munene, J. C., Ntayi, J., Kagaari, J., Mafabi, S., & Kasekende, F. (2019). Psychological capital and happiness at the workplace: The mediating role of flow experience. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1685060
van den Hout, J. J.J., Davis, O. C., & Weggeman, M. C. D. P. (2018). The Conceptualization of Team Flow. The Journal of Psychology, 152(6), 388–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2018.1449729
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations
Be aware of not providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts (e.g., about flow) and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title (i.e., relationship between work and flow).
As I recall, Csikentmihalyi's original flow studies include some professions such as surgery.
Good balance of theory and research
Include more in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters.
Consider including more examples/case studies
Overview and Conclusion are well developed - these are the most important sections
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there !
Your topic is very intriguing and encouraged me do some of my own research which might be beneficial to you ! Firstly, I found this awesome book that focuses on the psychophysiology of the flow experience which would be an interesting perspective to add. Here is the link: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-53468-4_8
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
Avoid starting sentences with a citation unless the author is particularly pertinent. Instead, it is more interesting for the the content/key point to be communicated, with the citation included along the way or, more typically, in parentheses at the end of the sentence.
Layout
The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections
Grammar
The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags)
Grammar-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages.[1]
Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance.
Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles
Excellent use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Excellent use of image(s)
Excellent use of tables
Excellent use of numbered lists (but use wiki format)
Excellent use of feature box(es)
Excellent use of quiz(zes)
Good use of case studies or examples
Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Very good use of external links in the "External links" section
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
A written description of the presentation is provided