Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Reward system, motivation, and emotion

Resources

Hi, Here are some resources you might find useful

Baik, J. (2020). Stress and the dopaminergic reward system. Experimental & Molecular Medicine, 52(12), 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-020-00532-4

Love, T. M. (2014). Oxytocin, motivation and the role of dopamine. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 119, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2013.06.011

Avena, N. M., & Bocarsly, M. E. (2012). Dysregulation of brain reward systems in eating disorders: Neurochemical information from animal models of binge eating, bulimia nervosa, and anorexia nervosa. Neuropharmacology, 63(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.11.010

Salamone, J. D., Correa, M., Ferrigno, S., Yang, J.-H., Rotolo, R. A., & Presby, R. E. (2018). The Psychopharmacology of Effort-Related Decision Making: Dopamine, Adenosine, and Insights into the Neurochemistry of Motivation. Pharmacological Reviews, 70(4), 747–762. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.117.015107

U3216256 (discuss • contribs) 07:20, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for these great resources! U3162201 (discuss • contribs) 23:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted User page Excellent – used effectively Excellent description about self provided Link(s) provided to professional profile(s) Link provided to book chapter Social contribution Excellent – at least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence Headings Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings - I've adjusted the Overview sub-headings to be bold but not headings This chapter will be a gateway to more specific chapters e.g., about dopamine, nucleus accumbens etc. So, for those key topics, look to summarise and provide embedded links to more specific chapters. Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations For sections which include sub-sections include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings 3rd focus question is useful, but not necessary; so, if word count becomes an issue, that could be truncated, with links to dedicated chapters (e.g., hijack hypothesis) Promising balance of theory and research Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of examples/case studies Be wary of overusing Reeve (2018) as a citation; ideally, go to original sources that may be cited in Reeve Conclusion (the most important section): Underway Figure Excellent – A relevant figure is presented and it is appropriately captioned Cite each figure at least once in the main text References Very good For APA referencing style, check and correct: italicisation page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Resources See also Excellent External links Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 20:45, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Social contribution

1. when doing an in-text citation of a textbook (not for journal articles unless you quote) for a specific idea (like the brain reward system or a brain function table) it is useful for the reader to know the page number your are referencing, for example (Reeve, 2018, p. xxx) or multiple pages (Reeve, 2018, pp. xxx-xxx) is easier for the reader than (Reeve, 2018). It is consistent with APA referencing but I encourage you to look it up for further information if needed. Hope this helps. --Alec.cortez (discuss • contribs) 22:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

2. I note your title has a capital D (in differences), this should be lower case according to APA Style, where the first word after the colon is capitalized only if it begins a complete sentence.--Alec.cortez (discuss • contribs) 23:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

PLEASE IGNORE THIS SUGGESTION. The D on this page is system generated and does not need to be APA. Apologies for any confusion Alec.cortez (discuss • contribs) 01:29, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

3. You have three figures on the right hand column (which is great). It would be beneficial to link them to your text. for example., ....the reward system in the nucleus accumblems, see figure 1

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem This was everything I had hoped for, for this chapter, and more - congratulations For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Overview Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon Engages reader interest by introducing a case study and/or example and/or using an image Clear focus question(s) Theory – Breadth An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds reasonably well on related chapters Theory – Depth Insightful depth is provided about the selected theory(ies) Key citations are well used Tables and/or lists are used effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information Some useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts The Reeve (2018) textbook is overused as a citation – instead, utilise primary, peer-reviewed sources Research – Key findings Relevant research is well reviewed Greater emphasis on effect sizes, major reviews, and/or meta-analyses would be helpful Research – Critical thinking Good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Claims are referenced Integration Discussion of theory and research is well integrated Conclusion Key points are well summarised Written expression – Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Sections which branch into sub-sections should include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see tags) Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Use the default heading style (e.g., remove additional bold) See earlier comments about heading casing Provide more descriptive headings Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are excellent APA style Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression; use quotation marks only for the first occurrence of the word or phrase, not for subsequent occurrences" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159) Figures Figures are reasonably well captioned Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation) Tables Table captions should use APA style. See example Refer to each Table at least once within the main text (e.g., see Table 1) Citations use correct APA style References use correct APA style Written expression – Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is excellent Some use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Very good use of image(s) Excellent use of table(s) Excellent use of feature box(es) Excellent use of quiz(zes) Good use of case studies or examples Very good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Very good use of external links in the "External links" section Social contribution ~12 logged, useful, mostly moderate to major social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:11, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent presentation Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation Consider creating an engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the topic is established Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes implied use of relevant psychological research; ideally make more explicit use of research Include citations to support claims The presentation makes very good use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information Conclusion A Conclusion slide is presented with excellent/very good/good take-home message(s) A Conclusion slide is presented with a basic summary The presentation could be strengthened by expanding on the take-home message (e.g., answers to more than one focus question) What are the practical take-home message(s) that we can use to help improve our everyday lives based on the best available psychological theory and research about this topic? The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages in response to each focus question The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit The Conclusion did not fit within the time limit Audio The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio Audio communication is well paced Very good intonation The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was very good Video Overall, visual display quality is excellent The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read; but on several slides it could be increased The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools Meta-data The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A written description of the presentation is provided Excellent use of time codes A link to the book chapter is provided but the hyperlink isn't active to allow 1-click access A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the presentation description but not in the meta-data

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:36, 22 November 2022 (UTC)