Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Interoception and emotion

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted User page Created – minimal, but sufficient Brief description about self provided – consider expanding Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution At least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence Headings Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development Reduce or remove the two basic definitional sections and tuck more immediately into unpacking the relationship between interoception and emotion Key points Basic development of some points Overview - Consider adding: a brief, evocative description of the problem focus questions an image an example or case study Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Consider including more examples/case studies Conclusion (the most important section): Underway Figure Excellent – A relevant figure is presented and it is appropriately captioned Cite each figure at least once in the main text References OK For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation italicisation doi formatting page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Resources See also Good Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02) External links Very good Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Comment

Hi,

I find your topic really interesting particularly because my chapter is on the insular cortex and emotion. It has been found that the insula plays a role in interoception (Uddin et al., 2017). This may be interesting to discuss if you are wanting to investigate the more physiological side of interoception and emotion :)

U3190094 (discuss • contribs) 23:52, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Suggestions for this chapter

Hello!, Great work on the chapter so far. I actually came across interoception when researching my topic and how it can help in regulating emotions. Here is a good article that explores this if you were interested! https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00786/full U3216389 (discuss • contribs) 06:29, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a solid chapter that makes good use of psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Overview Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon Engages reader interest by introducing a case study and/or example and/or using an image Clear focus question(s) Theory – Breadth Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained Perhaps more about the role of the insula (neuroscience) would be helpful The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters) Theory – Depth Appropriate depth is provided about the selected theory(ies) Key citations are well used Tables and/or lists could be used more effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information Some useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts Research – Key findings Reasonably good review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Is there research evidence about the suggested interventions? Greater emphasis on effect sizes, major reviews, and/or meta-analyses would be helpful Research – Critical thinking Very good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Claims are referenced Integration There is reasonably good integration between theory and research Conclusion Key points are well summarised Clear take-home message(s) Written expression – Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead: it is, most often, not needed at all, or use section linking Layout Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Grammar Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats')[1] Check and correct use of affect vs. effect Use serial commas[2] – they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. See explanatory video (1 min) Check and correct use of that vs. who Spelling Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour) APA style Do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Figures Figures are very well captioned Provide more detailed Figure captions to help connect the figure to the text Figure captions use the correct format Figure captions should use this format: Figure X. Descriptive caption in sentence casing. See example Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1) Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation) Tables Table captions use APA style Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text Citations use correct APA style References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[3] Check and correct use of italicisation Page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Include hyperlinked dois Written expression – Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is very good Good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Very good use of image(s) No use of table(s) Very good use of feature box(es) No use of quiz(zes) Excellent use of case studies or examples Basic/No use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Basic/No use of external links in the "External links" section Use bullet-points and numbered lists, per Tutorial 02 Social contribution ~1 logged, useful, minor social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic presentation The presentation is under the maximum time limit, so there was room for further development of the ideas Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Also narrate. This presentation has an opening scenario to hook audience interest Establish a context for the topic (e.g., by using an example or explaining why it is important), to help the viewer understand Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic The presentation is well structured (i.e., Overview, Content, Conclusion) The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes no explicit use of relevant psychological research The presentation includes some citations The presentation makes use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies Conclusion A Conclusion slide is presented with a useful summary What are the practical take-home message(s) that we can use to help improve our everyday lives based on the best available psychological theory and research about this topic? Audio The presentation makes basic use of narrated audio Consider slowing down and leaving longer pauses between sentences. This can help the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point Basic intonation Audio recording quality was very good Video Overall, visual display quality is basic The presentation makes basic use of text and image based slides Some of the font size could be larger to make it easier to read Remove italics to make it easier to read The amount of text presented per slide could be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a basic way by images and/or diagrams The presentation is basically produced using simple tools Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. Links to and from the book chapter are provided A link to the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are not provided. A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:31, 12 November 2022 (UTC)