Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Hidden costs of reward

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comments for Application Box 3[edit source]

Feedback and suggestions[edit source]

Comments[edit source]

  • Self - I think I'm noticing that writing on something with such a specific sub-context is more difficult than I anticipated. As opposed to writing about a specific item, attempting to explain the deeper-level idea of how reward comes with hidden costs is much less straight forward than describing something that is more top level.
  • Page looks pretty good on mobile to be honest. I am surprised.

saved templates[edit source]

Case study
Text

Heading casing[edit source]

FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 20:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title[edit source]

  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted

User page[edit source]

  1. Used effectively
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Excellent – at least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence

Headings[edit source]

  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Basic heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding and refining
  3. Probably the structure to aim for is 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with the larger sections using level 2 headings. I suggest avoiding level 3 headings because it tends to become overly complicated. I've tidied up the structure a bit to use a single-level to start with, but it needs further fleshing out.
  4. Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings

Key points[edit source]

  1. Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
  2. Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts (e.g., self determination theory) and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
  3. Overview - Consider adding:
    1. a brief, evocative description of the problem
    2. an image
    3. an example or case study
  4. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  5. Consider including more examples/case studies
  6. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. What might the take-home, practical messages be?

Figure[edit source]

  1. Excellent – A relevant figure is presented and it is appropriately captioned
  2. Well done on creating and uploading your own image! – this can also be listed as a social contribution
  3. The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
  4. Cite each figure at least once in the main text

References[edit source]

  1. Excellent
  2. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)

Resources[edit source]

  1. See also
    1. Excellent
  2. External links
    1. Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 20:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Book chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem
  2. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits

Overview[edit source]

  1. Well developed Overview
  2. Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon
  3. Engages reader interest by introducing a case study and/or example and/or using an image
  4. Clear focus question(s)

Theory – Breadth[edit source]

  1. Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained
  2. The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory
  3. Builds very well on related chapters

Theory – Depth[edit source]

  1. Insightful depth is provided about the selected theory(ies)
  2. Tables and/or lists are used effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information
  3. Some useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts

Research – Key findings[edit source]

  1. Relevant research is well reviewed

Research – Critical thinking[edit source]

  1. Very good critical thinking about relevant research is evident
  2. Critical thinking about research may be further evidenced by:
    1. describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies
    2. suggesting specific directions for future research
  3. Claims are referenced

Integration[edit source]

  1. There is reasonably good integration between theory and research
  2. The chapter places more emphasis on theory than research

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. Key points are well summarised
  2. Clear take-home message(s)

Written expression – Style[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent
    2. Use active (e.g., "this chapter explored") rather than passive voice (e.g., "this chapter has explored" or "this chapter will explore") [1][2]
  2. Layout
    1. Sections which branch into sub-sections should include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections
  3. Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are excellent
    1. Figures
      1. Figures are very well captioned
      2. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text
      3. Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation)
    2. Tables
      1. Table captions should use APA style. See example
      2. Refer to each Table using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation)
    3. Citations use correct APA style
    4. References use correct APA style

Written expression – Learning features[edit source]

  1. Overall, the use of learning features is excellent
  2. Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles
  3. Excellent use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Excellent use of image(s)
  5. Excellent use of table(s)
  6. Excellent use of feature box(es)
  7. Excellent use of quiz(zes)
  8. Excellent use of case studies or examples
  9. Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
  10. Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~22 logged, useful, minor/moderate/major social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an outstanding presentation

Overview[edit source]

  1. This presentation has a very engaging introduction to hook audience interest
  2. The purpose of the presentation is accurately communicated
  3. A context for the topic is clearly established through an example
  4. Focus questions are used throughout

Content[edit source]

  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation addresses the topic in an engaging, informative, entertaining way
  3. An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
  4. The presentation is well structured (i.e., Overview, Content, Conclusion)
  5. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory
  6. The presentation makes implied use of relevant psychological research
  7. The presentation includes verbal citations to support claims; some could also be included visually
  8. The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice
  9. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. A Conclusion slide is presented with excellent take-home message(s)

Audio[edit source]

  1. The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to
  2. The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio
  3. Audio communication is clear and well paced
  4. Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement
  5. The narration is well polished
  6. Audio recording quality was excellent

Video[edit source]

  1. Overall, visual display quality is excellent
  2. The presentation makes effective use of text, image, and webcam
  3. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
  4. The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time
  5. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams
  6. The presentation is very well produced

Meta-data[edit source]

  1. The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. A written description of the presentation is provided
  3. Links to and from the book chapter are provided

Licensing[edit source]

  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:50, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]