Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Expressive suppression and emotion regulation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity

Suggestions for this chapter

[edit source]

Hello! Really great chapter you have done, especially on expressive suppression. A suggestion I would make to improve the chapter is to explore emotion regulation more and give expressive suppression some context and then explore how they are related to one another. This is an article that looks at a cognitive vs behavioural approach to emotion regulation which could help if you wanted to implement this. Hope this helps! https://bmcpsychology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40359-018-0261-0 U3216389 (discusscontribs) 03:40, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted
  1. Excellent – used effectively
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter
  1. At least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence
  2. If adding the second or subsequent link to a page, create a direct link like this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
  3. Use a numbered list (see Tutorial 02)
  1. Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development
  2. Use default heading formatting (i.e., avoid bold, italics, underline, changing the size etc.)
  1. Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
  2. Overview - Consider adding:
    1. an evocative description of the problem and what will be covered
    2. focus questions
    3. an image
    4. an example or case study
  3. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research
  4. Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  5. Consider including more examples/case studies
  6. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Hasn't been developed
  1. A relevant figure is presented
  2. Caption should include Figure X. ...
  3. Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
  4. Cite each figure at least once in the main text
  1. OK
  2. Move non-peer-reviewed sources into External links
  3. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. Cite all authors up to 20
    2. capitalisation
    3. italicisation
    4. doi formatting
    5. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
  1. See also
    1. Very good
    2. Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)
    3. Use sentence casing
    4. Include source in brackets after link
    5. Also link to related book chapters
  2. External links
    1. OK
    2. Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)
    3. Use sentence casing
    4. Include source in brackets after link
    5. Target an international audience; Australians only represent 0.33% of the world population

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Comment

[edit source]

Hey there ! This chapter looks really great!

I would encourage you to also look into the emotion regulation and ageing book chapter from previous years as this might hold some beneficial information for you. I look forward to learning more about expressive suppression and emotion regulation once your chapter is complete ! I also found this source which might come in handy for you :) Good luck

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3176462/ U3210431 (discusscontribs) 23:27, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Book chapter review and feedback

[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem
  2. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
  1. Solid Overview; well explained concepts
  2. Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon
  3. Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest
  4. Clear focus question(s)
  1. Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained
  2. Build more strongly on other emotion-related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters in this category: Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Emotion regulation)
  1. Insightful depth is provided about the selected theory(ies)
  2. Tables and/or lists are used effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information
  1. Relevant research is very well reviewed
  1. Very good critical thinking about relevant research is evident
  2. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by:
    1. considering the strength of relationships
    2. acknowledging limitations
    3. pointing out critiques/counterarguments
    4. suggesting specific directions for future research
  3. Claims are referenced
  1. Discussion of theory and research is well integrated
  1. Key points are well summarised
  2. Add practical, take-home message(s)
  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is very good
    2. "People" is often a better term than "individuals"
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter uses a basic two-level structure
    2. Sections which branch into sub-sections should include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections
  3. Grammar
    1. Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats')[1]
    2. Use serial commas[2] – they are part of APA style and agenerally recommended by grammaticists. See explanatory video (1 min)
    3. Abbreviations
      1. Check and correct use of (such as e.g., i.e., etc.). i.e. is sometimes used where e.g. would be more appropriate.
      2. Abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e., et al., etc.) should only be used inside parentheses
  4. Spelling
    1. Spelling can be improved (e.g., see the [spelling?] tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages.
    2. Figure
      1. Figure is well captioned
      2. Figure captions should use this format: Figure X. Descriptive caption in sentence casing. See example
      3. Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1)
    3. Citations use correct APA style
    4. Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example:
      1. If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either:
        1. in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or
        2. in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020)
      2. Do not include author initials
    5. References are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. Check and correct use of italicisation
      2. Include hyperlinked dois
  1. Overall, the use of learning features is very good
  2. Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles.
  3. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Basic use of image(s)
  5. No use of table(s)
  6. Excellent use of feature box(es)
  7. Basic use of quiz(zes)
  8. Excellent use of case studies or examples
  9. Good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section. Use bullet-points per Tutorial 02. Include source in parentheses.
  10. Basic use of external links in the "External links" section. Move academic articles to References. Use bullet-points per Tutorial 02. Include source in parentheses.
  11. Format bullet-points and numbered lists, per Tutorial 02
  1. ~4 logged, useful, minor/moderate/major social contributions with direct links to evidence
  2. Use a numbered list

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:18, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is a good presentation
  1. Display and narrate a slide with the title and sub-title to help the viewer understand the purpose of the presentation
  2. This presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest
  3. Focus questions are presented
  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation addresses the topic
  3. An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
  4. The presentation is reasonably structured, but lacks a distinct Overview and Conclusion
  5. The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory
  6. The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological research
  7. The presentation includes citations to support claims
  8. The presentation makes very good use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice
  9. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information
  1. A Conclusion is presented, but it could be made more distinct, to highlight key take-home messages
  1. The audio is easy to follow
  2. Good intonation
  3. The narration is well practiced
  4. Audio recording quality was very good
  1. Overall, visual display quality is good
  2. The presentation makes good use of animated slides
  3. Perhaps it could help to include additional text to support key points
  4. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
  5. The presentation is well produced using simple tools
  6. The presentation is basically produced using simple tools
  1. The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
  3. A link to the book chapter is provided but the hyperlink isn't active to allow 1-click access
  4. A link from the book chapter is provided
  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the presentation description but not in the meta-data

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply