Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Difficult conversations and emotion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity

Suggestions for this chapter

[edit source]

Hello! It looks like you've got the foundation for your chapter under way. I suggest using hyperlinks to relevant theories as well as case study boxes and examples. There are some fun templates you can find on wikiversity to make these boxes really cool and help engage the audience. Hope this helps! U3216389 (discusscontribs) 02:54, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted
  1. Excellent – used effectively
  2. Excellent description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter
  1. At least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence
  1. Promising 2-level heading structure
  2. Consider starting with the problem of "difficult conversations" (e.g., why do we need to have them etc.) and then moving to the role of emotion
  1. Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
  2. The key additional work I think is making stronger connections/closer links between emotion/emotional self-regulation and difficult conversations, with an emphasis on both theory and research. There might be several areas as you unpack these, but perhaps focus on small number of key elements.
  3. For sections which include sub-sections include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
  4. Overview - Consider adding:
    1. focus questions
    2. an image
    3. an example or case study
  5. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  6. Consider including more examples/case studies
  7. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Underway
  1. Excellent – A relevant figure is presented and it is appropriately captioned
  2. Cite each figure at least once in the main text
  1. Excellent
  2. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
  1. See also
    1. Good
    2. Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)
    3. Include source in brackets after link
    4. Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages
  2. External links
    1. Very good
    2. Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:09, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is an excellent
  1. An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. A context for the topic is established
  3. Focus questions are presented
  1. The presentation addresses the topic
  2. The presentation is well structured (i.e., Overview, Content, Conclusion)
  3. Avoid over-reference to book chapter - this should be a stand-alone presentation
  4. The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological theory
  5. The presentation makes implied use of relevant psychological research; ideally include research more explicitly
  6. The presentation includes citations to support claims
  7. The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies
  8. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information
  1. A Conclusion slide is presented with excellent take-home message(s)
  2. The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit
  1. The audio is easy to follow
  2. The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio
  3. Audio communication is well paced
  4. Very good intonation
  5. The narration is well practiced
  6. Audio recording quality was very good
  1. Overall, visual display quality is excellent
  2. The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides
  3. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
  4. The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time
  5. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams
  6. The presentation is well produced using simple tools
  1. The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
  3. Links to and from the book chapter are provided
  4. The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This introduces limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info.
  1. Image sources are communicated in a general way. Also provide links to each image and the license details.
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Book chapter review and feedback

[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is a reasonably good chapter. It makes makes good use of psychological theory and research to help address a real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. Well under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand
  3. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
  1. Basic Overview
  2. Briefly explains the problem or phenomenon
  3. Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest
  4. Basic focus question(s)
  1. A good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained
  2. Relevant theory is reasonably well explained
  3. Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters)
  1. Reasonably good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies)
  2. No use of tables and/or lists are to help clearly convey key theoretical information
  3. Some use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts
  1. Basic review of relevant research
  2. More detail about key studies would be ideal
  3. Greater emphasis on effect sizes, major reviews, and/or meta-analyses would be helpful
  4. Lack of sufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
  1. Basic critical thinking about relevant research is evident
  2. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by:
    1. describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies
    2. discussing the direction of relationships
    3. considering the strength of relationships
    4. acknowledging limitations
    5. pointing out critiques/counterarguments
    6. suggesting specific directions for future research
  1. Basic integration between theory and research
  1. Basic summary and conclusion
  2. Remind the reader about the importance of the problem or phenomenon of interest
  3. Key points are summarised
  4. Add practical, take-home message(s)
  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is very good
  2. Layout
    1. Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see [Provide more detail] tags)
  3. Grammar
    1. Use serial commas[1] – they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. See explanatory video (1 min)
    2. Check and correct use of that vs. who
  4. APA style
    1. Do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc.
    2. Figures
      1. Figures are well captioned
      2. Figure captions use the correct format
      3. Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation)
    3. Citations use correct APA style
    4. References use correct APA style
  1. Excellent use of learning features
  2. Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
  3. One use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Good use of image(s)
  5. No use of table(s)
  6. Excellent use of feature box(es)
  7. Excellent use of quiz(zes)
  8. Excellent use of case studies or examples
  9. Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
  10. Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section
  1. ~4 logged minor social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:21, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply