Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Compassion fatigue in mental health professionals

Heading casing

Hi U3055143. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:42, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Feedback

Hi there; I see you are still working through the chapter. You may already have it in mind but I just noticed that the image size needs to be little bit bigger and you will need in-text reference to the image. Good Luck

. User:ArtOfHappiness (discuss • contribs) 16:00, 08 October 2022 (UTC)

Compassion Fatigue

Hi,

Your book chapter is progressing nicely! You may have already planned to do this, but it may be interesting to briefly discuss the increased pressure on healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and how this has influenced cases of compassion fatigue (e.g. have they increased, stayed the same, decreased?). U3203545 (discuss • contribs) 09:12, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Chapter feedback

Hi, Your chapter is coming along nicely. A few things to note,

• Your figures are not APA - you need to italicise the word ‘figure’ and the number.
• You could add hyperlinks to words that may not be common - e.g., traumatic distress, burnout. Even for terms that are common, providing hyperlinks makes the chapter more engaging.
• You look as if you are at the point where you can remove the ME template. Taking out the ‘suggestions for this section’ box and the learning features section will help with the layout
• Your references look good but they aren’t all in APA formatting. Make sure you change them before you submit your chapter.

Hope this helps. U3216256 (discuss • contribs) 08:44, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Suggestions for this chapter

Hello! This topic is very similar to burnout and I did some research and within the literature there are many comparisons and analysis made between the two so I suggest maybe taking a look into this for the chapter to deepen the understanding of the topic. I have found a good article looking at both burnout and compassion fatigue which may be useful. Hope this helps! https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3662129/ U3216389 (discuss • contribs) 02:30, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted User page Used effectively Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution Excellent – at least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence Headings Promising mostly 2-level heading structure Consider removing 3rd level of heading to simplify Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Key points Basic development of key points for each section, with relevant citations For sections which include sub-sections include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Avoid starting sentences with author name - instead focus on the important info, with the citation at the end Use academic peer-reviewed sources rather than websites Direct quotes need page numbers Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) – more info Consider connnecting to chapter(s) about emotional labour Overview - Consider adding: avoid starting with a quote - better to create an evocative description in your own words an evocative description of the problem and what will be covered an image an example or case study Promising balance of theory and research Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Consider including more examples/case studies Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed Figure A relevant figure is presented Caption should italicise Figure X. ... The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text References Move non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section (or delete) Very good For APA referencing style, check and correct: italicisation Resources See also Excellent Very good Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages External links Very good Use sentence casing

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:29, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Suggestions for Resources

Hi Anna,

Just thought I'd send some interesting references your way - may be relevant (or not):

1. https://content.ebscohost.com/ContentServer.asp?T=P&P=AN&K=2022-07512-001&S=L&D=pdh&EbscoContent=dGJyMMvl7ESeprE4zdnyOLCmsEqepq9Sr6y4TK%2BWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMPGptFC3qLNMuePfgeyx44Dt6fIA This is a critical review that explores the relationship between self-care and compassion fatigue. The Clinical and Workplace Implications component is brief but provides good overview of organisational strategies to mitigate compassion fatigue.
2. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/20008198.2021.2022278?needAccess=true This is a systematic review which goes into the organisational factors contributing to compassion fatigue.
3. https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/rb68xj09m. Not a peer-reviewed article so can't be used as a reference. But I found it provided an interesting overview of the self-care component to your topic, i.e., good background reading
4. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/content/pdf/10.1007/s42843-022-00054-9.pdf. Excellent article that looks at building compassion fatigue resilience. Has some 'vignette's' that you could possibly adapt as case studies in your book chapter.

U943292 (discuss • contribs) 01:32, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a solid chapter that makes good use of psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem Under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview The Overview is underdeveloped The focus is initially too broad (mental health) Narrow in on compassion fatigue in MH professionals. Where it focuses, it is too specific to nursing rather than MH professionals. Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest Clear focus question(s) Theory – Breadth Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained Summarise definitional material and move more directly to the topic at hand Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters) Build more strongly on other compassion- and fatigue-related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters in this category: Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Compassion) Theory – Depth Insightful depth is provided about the selected theory(ies) Key citations are well used Tables and/or lists are used effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information More examples could be useful to illustrate key concepts Research – Key findings Relevant research is well reviewed Greater emphasis on effect sizes, major reviews, and/or meta-analyses would be helpful Research – Critical thinking Very good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Claims are referenced Integration Discussion of theory and research is well integrated Conclusion Key points are well summarised Clear take-home message(s) Written expression – Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is basic Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes. Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead: it is, most often, not needed at all, or use section linking Reduce use of weasel words which bulk out the text, but don't enhance meaning Sections which branch into sub-sections should include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags). Grammar-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance. Check and make correct use of commas Abbreviations Abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e., et al., etc.) should only be used inside parentheses Sometimes when "i.e." is used "e.g." would be more appropriate APA style Do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression; use quotation marks only for the first occurrence of the word or phrase, not for subsequent occurrences" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159) Direct quotes need page numbers – even better, write in your own words Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numerals (e.g., 10) Replace double spaces with single spaces Figures Figures are well captioned Figure captions use the correct format Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1) Tables Table captions should use APA style. See example Refer to each Table using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation) Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example: If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either: in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020) Do not include author initials Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses and "and" outside parentheses References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Include hyperlinked dois Written expression – Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is good Basic use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Links to non-peer-reviewed sources should be moved to the external links section Basic use of image(s) Good use of table(s) Excellent use of feature box(es) Good use of quiz(zes) Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section. Also include links to relevant Wikipedia articles. OK use of external links in the "External links" section. Be more selective. Include sources in parentheses after the link. Social contribution ~11 logged, useful, minor to major social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:52, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent/very good/reasonably good/basic presentation Overall, this is an insufficient presentation Overall, this is an insufficient presentation mainly because it presents too much content visually and auditorily The presentation is over the maximum time limit — content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed. The sub-title is narrated. Also narrate the title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation There is then a long pause Consider creating an engaging introduction to hook audience interest Establish a context for the topic (e.g., by using an example or explaining why it is important), to help the viewer understand Focus questions are presented Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic The presentation is well structured (i.e., Overview, Content, Conclusion) The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological research The presentation includes some citations to support claims. Use academic sources. The presentation makes basic use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies Conclusion The Conclusion did not fit within the time limit Audio The audio narration was OK Some pause between slides is good, but these pauses I think are too long, especially give that the presentation goes over time Basic intonation Audio recording quality was OK. It sounds a bit dull/woolly? Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality. Video Overall, visual display quality is basic The presentation makes basic use of text and image based slides Some of the font size could be larger to make it easier to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a basic way by images and/or diagrams The presentation is basically produced using simple tools Meta-data The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. A link to the book chapter is provided but the hyperlink isn't active to allow 1-click access A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:50, 10 November 2022 (UTC)