Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Burnout

Reference Assistance

Hi, this is a really good topic as I believe that a lot of people suffer from burnout due to current world situations that are ever changing. With the increase in the cost of living and the people’s yearly wages remaining unchanged but there being an increase in workload, I believe we might see a rise in job burnout in the near future.

I have provided you with a couple of references that I think might be helpful to your topic.

Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2006). Burnout. Stress and quality of working life: current perspectives in occupational health, 37, 42-49.

Leiter, M. P., Maslach, C., & Frame, K. (2014). Burnout. The encyclopedia of clinical psychology, 1-7.

Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 397-422. Lturner2311 (discuss • contribs) 04:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Final chapter suggestion

Hi! This is such a great and important topic since it is such a broad issue in the mordern day world. We're definitely seeing burnout on the rise, but I do think going into why the brain goes into burnout biologically can be an important factor to include, such as talking about brain chemicals like serotonin and norepinephrine, how they play a role in burnot, and why it's important to monitor them. --Teermeej Hossain (discuss • contribs) 15:05, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Helpful Resource

Hi, I came across this resource CETC - Secondary Traumatic Stress and Staff Well-being: Understanding compassion fatigue, vicarious trauma and burnout in therapeutic care - practice guide - CETC at work today. It states 'The term “burnout” was coined in the 1970s by the American psychologist Herbert Freudenberger. He used it to describe the consequences of severe stress and high ideals in “helping” professions'. It has some references at the end of the document that may be helpful to you. I'm working on compassion fatigue and the two concepts come up together a lot in the literature. U3055143 (discuss • contribs) 08:03, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Context suggestion

Hi, You have a strong foundation of the layout of your chapter and it appears to flow very well. I would suggest including different contexts of burnout as there is 3 main domains, occupational burnout, individual burnout and organisational burnout. --GeorgiaFairweather (discuss • contribs) 09:57, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello! I have changed some sentence structuring in the section 'what is the difference between burnout and stress' but I thought you could possibly use the bit I have turned into a sort of dialogue example into a case study example. I think this could really make the concept easier to understand, more relatable and impactful. Hope this helps :) - U3222363 --Sophia246 (discuss • contribs) 10:22, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Suggestions for this chapter

Hello, some good work so far, Im looking forward to seeing it fleshed out. I would suggest perhaps giving some specific examples of where burnout is seen in the workforce. I have found a good article that examines burnout specifically in healthcare which may help narrow down the focus. It also provides some good preventative measures to burnout as well. Hope this helps! https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7604257/ U3216389 (discuss • contribs) 02:19, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, great work on the chapter and explaining burnout and clarifying the difference between burnout and stress! I noticed it seems you have explored burnout from a neurotypical perspective. An idea for further exploration and depth for the chapter could involve looking at burnout from mental illness and neurodivergency such as autism. You could look at what causes burnout in these instances and what could be done about it :) - U3222363 --Sophia246 (discuss • contribs) 10:38, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted User page Excellent – used effectively Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution At least one contribution has been made and summarised with indirect link(s) to evidence Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions. Use a numbered list Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic Key points Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations User lower-case for "burnout"; remove other instances of overcapitalisation (APA style) – more info Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations Overview - Consider adding: an evocative description of the problem and what will be covered an image an example or case study Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research Include more in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters. Consider including more examples/case studies Move references into the References section (rather than putting external links in the main body). Keep citations in the main body. Use peer-reviewed sources as citations rather than webpages; the webpages can be added to External links. Target an international audience; Australians only represent 0.33% of the world population Conclusion (the most important section): Well developed Underway What might the take-home, practical messages be? In a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions? Figure A figure is presented Caption is a little awkward; could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text References Hmmm ... move non-peer reviewed/non-academic sources into External links For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation italicisation doi formatting include volume number and issue number page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Remove "Retrieved from ..." Remember that the goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic Resources See also Move external links to External links Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages External links Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:46, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an insufficient chapter I suspect that the recommended 5 topic development hours and 45 book chapter hours were not invested in preparing this chapter. Insufficient use of primary, peer-reviewed sources as citations Move non-peer reviewed links into the external links section Well under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Basic Overview Briefly explains the problem or phenomenon Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest Basic focus question(s) Theory – Breadth Insufficient use of psychological theory about this topic Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters) Theory – Depth Insufficient use of relevant psychological theory Research – Key findings Insufficient use of relevant psychological research Greater emphasis on effect sizes, major reviews, and/or meta-analyses would be helpful Research – Critical thinking Insufficient critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Some claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the tags) Integration Insufficient integration of relevant theory and research Conclusion Insufficient as a cohesive summary of what the best available psychological theory and research has to say about the topic Written expression – Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is basic Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes. Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags). Grammar-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance. Use serial commas[2] – they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. See explanatory video (1 min) Check and correct use of semi-colons (;) and colons (:) Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats') Spelling Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour) Proofreading More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard Remove unnecessary capitalisation APA style Do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Replace double spaces with single spaces Figures Provide more detailed Figure captions to help connect the figure to the text Figure captions use the correct format Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1) Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example: If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either: in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020) References use correct APA style References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[3] Check and correct use of italicisation Page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Include hyperlinked dois "Retrieved from" is no longer used (APA style, 7th ed.) Move non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section Template material has been removed Written expression – Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is basic No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Citations and links to non-peer-reviewed sources should be moved to the external links section Basic use of image(s) Basic use of table(s) Basic use of feature box(es) No use of quiz(zes) No use of case studies or examples Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Also include links to related Wikipedia articles Very good use of external links in the "External links" section Use sentence casing Social contribution ~1 logged social contributions without direct links to evidence, so unable to easily verify and assess

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:07, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a very good presentation Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation This presentation has a basic introduction Consider creating an engaging introduction to hook audience interest Establish a context for the topic (e.g., by using an example or explaining why it is important), to help the viewer understand Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation is well structured (i.e., Overview, Content, Conclusion) The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes implied use of relevant psychological research; ideally make more explicit use of research Include citations to support claims The presentation makes basic use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information Conclusion A Conclusion slide is presented with a basic summary Audio The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to Audio communication is well paced Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement Audio recording quality was good Video Overall, visual display quality is very good The presentation makes basic use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The presentation is well produced using simple tools Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation A written description of the presentation is provided Links to and from the book chapter are provided Licensing Image sources are communicated, however this reveals that the presentation has violated the copyrights of image owners as images appear to have been used without permission. A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:51, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Book chapter resubmission comments

1. These changes were reviewed. Overall, these were minor improvements. my copyedits and these comments:
2. ~760 words added, but the chapter is still well below the maximum word count
3. A more engaging start to the Overview is provided, however the correspondence between the sub-title and the focus questions remains poor
4. A clearer description of burnout is provided
5. Clarification tags were not removed when issues were resolved
6. Citations were included where requested via tags
7. Some content about the impact of burnout on the brain was added, but this wasn't related to the sub-title or the focus questions
8. No substantial improvements were made to content about how burnout can be managed (2nd part of topic) or how it can be prevented (3rd part of topic)
9. 3 academic peer-reviewed citations were added
10. No substantial improvements to the Conclusion, Style (other than the flagged suggestions), Learning Features, and no additional social contributions

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:46, 28 November 2022 (UTC)