Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi! I can see you've almost finished and you've put a lot of work into your topic. Just a reminder about making sure your references follow 7th APA format (italicisation of journal and volume number). --U3205964 (discuss • contribs) 05:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. I found your topic development really interesting thus far. I like your use of the sub-headings as it allows for the reader to follow the content easily. I have added an additional internal link that I believe will assist you in developing a good description and/or understanding for your "The need to transition explained through the hierarchy of needs" section (Book Chapter, 2013). I also found a journal article about the relationship between mental health and gender dysphoria. This specific journal article proposed some interesting points and I thought you could maybe use it is an interesting case study.
I have included both links within this comment but I have also added them to your working comments section --U3189442 - K.Ryan (discuss • contribs) 21:41, 29 August 2021 (UTC).Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
Extensive heading development - if anything, refine/reduce as the draft develops
Terminology - This section isn't needed - instead briefly introduce new terms as they are used and provide internal wiki links on first mention of those terms to relevant Wikipedia articles.
Identified gender vs self - Cognitive dissonance / disconcordant self could be a useful theory here
Plenty of theoretical perspectives are offered - be prepared to be selective - useful the most useful few well may develop a better chapter than covering lots more briefly. But there's no hard and fast rules here.
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there,
This may seem shorter and less detailed, but I had previously typed up a lot of comments that all got lost in transition during a page edit and Wikiversity lost the lot due to a conflict error. I'll try to go over everything that I remember here...
1. A number of sentences are written in passive language. For example, "Gender dysphoria (‘dysphoria’) was the updated term selected when the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published it’s 5th edition (‘DSM-5’)." can be rewritten as "Gender dysphoria (‘dysphoria’) is the current term as of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (‘DSM-5’)". Switching sentences from passive to active language strengthens those points. It's particularly noticeable when you are citing studies.
2. You have some sections where there are headings without text. It might be a good idea to remove redundant subheadings and consolidate information.
3. There are some incomplete sentences (e.g. While medically-transitioning is undertaken to alleviate dysphoria and help align the identified gender with the self, this is not the only motivator for undergoing this proces") and a number of sentences that are sitting by themselves. Can the lone sentences be consolidated into other paragraphs in their sections?
4. You're outlining some information that really needs references. Examples include when you cite Devor's theory (no reference in the initial sentence) and Maslow's Hierarchy. Speaking of Devor, consider adding the 14 stages as a table just to show what they are.
5. The chapter could use a case study or a few, and good spots seem to be at the end of the 'big' theories. Consider using case studies or some other feature to highlight the key information from those theories.
6. As a suggestion, your last paragraph in the "A term used to disminish the transgender experience" section could be moved down into the "Different gender affirmation routes for different pursuits" - that paragraph reads like it would be better in that section.
7. The non-academic references will need to be removed from the reference list. If you want to cite Erikson (1980) you'll need to amend the reference to a scientific source or replace it with a scientific source.
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits.
Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained.
The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory.
Ideally, also build on other gender-related chapters (e.g., by incorporating embedded links to other chapters in this category: Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Gender).
Overall, the use of learning features is very good.
Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. # No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
An opening slide with the title and sub-title is presented - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation - also narrate the title/sub-title.
A context for the topic is established.
This presentation has an engaging introduction to hook audience interest.
Briefly explain why this topic is important.
Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages.
The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to.
The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio.
Audio communication is clear and well paced.
Very good intonation enhances listener interest and engagement.
Audio recording quality was good. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., sounds like there is a dog walking around?). Consider using an external microphone.
There was no discernible evidence of speech impediment. But sub-titles are an excellent accessibility feature!
The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used in the name of the presentation - the latter would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
A written description of the presentation is provided.
A brief written description of the presentation is provided.