Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2021/Psilocybin and spirituality

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comment[edit source]

Hi Ben, Really interesting topic you have chosen, I think it is always important to look into the historical contexts when discussing topics of such a sensitive nature. Could it be a suggestion to maybe go more into the types of dosages in regards to what effects the individual will experience? Does everyone have different tolerances? 29 August 8:08 (UTC)(The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]]) )

Hey Ben, your topic looks great! I made some minor spelling changes for you. Goodluck [[1]] 13/10/21 4:02 pm (UTC)

Hey Ben, loved reading this chapter, it is super interesting that research is being done into different previously sensitive and controversial topics. I thought you may be able to add the 2019 book chapter Psilocybin and emotion: What are the emotional effects of psilocybin? to your internal links: https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Motivation_and_emotion/Book/2019/Psilocybin_and_emotion hope this could be useful! --Eilish Ritchie (discusscontribs) 07:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title[edit source]

  1. Excellent

User page[edit source]

  1. Created - minimal, but sufficient
  2. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  3. Link provided to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Summarised with indirect link(s) to evidence.
  2. Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.

Headings[edit source]

  1. Excellent
  2. Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic.

Key points[edit source]

  1. Fantastic

Figure[edit source]

  1. A figure with caption is presented.
  2. Caption
    1. does not use APA style - include Figure 1. ...
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text.
  4. Consider increasing image size to make it easier to view.

References[edit source]

  1. Excellent
  2. Very good
  3. Good
  4. OK
  5. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. capitalisation
    2. dois should be active hyperlinks

Resources[edit source]

  1. Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. This chapter is particularly well written.
  3. The integration of theory and research is excellent.
  4. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits.

Overview[edit source]

  1. Well developed Overview.
  2. Developing focus questions could help to guide the reader and structure the chapter. However, this chapter is so well structured and written, that focus questions aren't necessary.

Theory — Breadth[edit source]

  1. Relevant theories are well selected succintly explained, and well applied to understanding the connections between psilocybin and spirituality.
  2. The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory. It maintains a scientific focus, despite the holistic/spiritual topic (good).

Theory — Depth[edit source]

  1. Appropriate depth is provided about the selected theory(ies).
  2. Key citations are well used.
  3. Tables and/or lists are used effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information.
  4. Useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts.

Research — Key findings[edit source]

  1. Relevant research is well reviewed.

Research — Critical thinking[edit source]

  1. Critical thinking about research is excellent.

Integration[edit source]

  1. Discussion of theory and research is very well integrated.

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. Well developed.
  2. Clear take-home messages.

Written expression — Style[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent.
    2. Avoid starting sentences with a citation unless the author is particularly pertinent. Instead, it is more interesting for the the content/key point to be communicated, with the citation included along the way or, more typically, in parentheses at the end of the sentence.
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter is very well structured, with major sections using sub-sections.
    2. Sections which branch into sub-sections should include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections.
  3. Grammar
    1. Use serial commas[2] - they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. Here's an explanatory video (1 min).
  4. Spelling is excellent
    1. Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour).
  5. Proofreading is excellent
  6. APA style is excellent
    1. Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numerals (e.g., 10).
    2. Figures and tables
      1. Each Table and Figure is referred to at least once within the main text.
      2. Ideally, provide more detailed Figure captions to help connect the figure to the text.
    3. Citations use correct APA style.
    4. References are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. Check and correct use of capitalisation
      2. Check and correct use of italicisation
      3. Page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
      4. Include hyperlinked dois

Written expression — Learning features[edit source]

  1. Overall, the use of learning features is excellent.
  2. Little use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example.
  3. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Excellent use of image(s).
  5. Very good use of table(s).
  6. Basic use of feature box(es).
  7. Basic use of quiz(zes).
  8. Very good use of case studies based on research studies.
  9. Format bullet-points and numbered lists, per Tutorial 1.

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~5 logged, useful, minor to moderate social contributions with indirect links to evidence.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:22, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent presentation.

Overview[edit source]

  1. An opening slide with the title and sub-title is presented and narrated - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. A clear structure is outlined.

Content[edit source]

  1. The presentation addresses the topic.
  2. An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little.
  3. The presentation is well structured.
  4. The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory.
  5. I'm a little surprised that the facial feedback hypothesis is considered to be important enough to highlight - is there any evidence that this is important for explaining the spiritual effects of psilocybin?
  6. The focus could be more narrowly on spiritual rather than psychological experience.
  7. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological research.
  8. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information.

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. A Conclusion slide is presented with a take-home message(s).

Audio[edit source]

  1. The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to.
  2. The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio.
  3. Audio communication is clear and well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
  4. Excellent intonation to enhance listener interest and engagement.
  5. Audio recording quality was very good. Maybe the microphone was slightly too close (some minor distortion).

Video[edit source]

  1. Overall, visual display quality is excellent.
  2. The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides.
  3. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read.
  4. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images.
  5. The video is very well produced.

Meta-data[edit source]

  1. The chapter title and sub-title are used in the name of the presentation - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
  3. Links to and from the book chapter are provided.

Licensing[edit source]

  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated.
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:35, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]