Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Ben, Really interesting topic you have chosen, I think it is always important to look into the historical contexts when discussing topics of such a sensitive nature. Could it be a suggestion to maybe go more into the types of dosages in regards to what effects the individual will experience? Does everyone have different tolerances? 29 August 8:08 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])
Hey Ben, your topic looks great! I made some minor spelling changes for you. Goodluck [[1]] 13/10/21 4:02 pm (UTC)
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
This chapter is particularly well written.
The integration of theory and research is excellent.
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits.
Developing focus questions could help to guide the reader and structure the chapter. However, this chapter is so well structured and written, that focus questions aren't necessary.
Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent.
Avoid starting sentences with a citation unless the author is particularly pertinent. Instead, it is more interesting for the the content/key point to be communicated, with the citation included along the way or, more typically, in parentheses at the end of the sentence.
Layout
The chapter is very well structured, with major sections using sub-sections.
Sections which branch into sub-sections should include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections.
Overall, the use of learning features is excellent.
Little use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Excellent use of image(s).
Very good use of table(s).
Basic use of feature box(es).
Basic use of quiz(zes).
Very good use of case studies based on research studies.
Format bullet-points and numbered lists, per Tutorial 1.
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little.
The presentation is well structured.
The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory.
I'm a little surprised that the facial feedback hypothesis is considered to be important enough to highlight - is there any evidence that this is important for explaining the spiritual effects of psilocybin?
The focus could be more narrowly on spiritual rather than psychological experience.
The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological research.
The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information.
The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to.
The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio.
Audio communication is clear and well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
Excellent intonation to enhance listener interest and engagement.
Audio recording quality was very good. Maybe the microphone was slightly too close (some minor distortion).