Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2021/Pleasure

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search


The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title[edit source]

  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted

User page[edit source]

  1. Used effectively
  2. Description about self provided, with link(s) to professional profile(s)
  3. Link provided to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Summarised with somewhat direct link(s) to evidence
  2. To add more direct links to evidence, view the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
  3. Add your Wikiversity signature to comments on talk/discussion pages

Headings[edit source]

  1. Promising structure, with headings clearly related to the topic
  2. 3rd-level structure is underdeveloped - consider either expanding this level or simplifying to a 2-level structure. As there are already quite a few headings, I'm inclined towards simplifying.
  3. Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading - use 0 or 2+ sub-headings

Key points[edit source]

  1. Overview is fantastic - Consider adding:
    1. an image
  2. Key points are partially developed for some sections, with relevant citations, and missing for other sections.
  3. For sections which include sub-section include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
  4. Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  5. Perhaps consider what is the evolutionary function of pleasure - why do we experience it?
  6. Expand theory and research
  7. Excellent use of examples/case studies
  8. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. hasn't been developed
    2. what might the take-home, practical messages be?
    3. in a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title?

Figure[edit source]

  1. A figure is presented
  2. Caption uses APA style
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text

References[edit source]

  1. Excellent

Resources[edit source]

  1. Excellent
  2. Minor - I've removed the "-"s

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:46, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. Slightly over the maximum word count.
  3. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits.

Overview[edit source]

  1. Well developed Overview.
  2. Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon.
  3. Clear focus question(s).
  4. Engages reader interest by introducing a case study and/or example and/or using an image.

Theory — Breadth[edit source]

  1. Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained.

Theory — Depth[edit source]

  1. Excellent depth is provided about the selected theory(ies).
  2. Useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts.

Research — Key findings[edit source]

  1. Relevant research is well reviewed.

Research — Critical thinking[edit source]

  1. Very good critical thinking about research is evident.

Integration[edit source]

  1. Discussion of theory and research is well integrated.

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. Key points are well summarised.
  2. Clear take-home message(s).

Written expression — Style[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent.
    2. Avoid one sentence paragraphs. A paragraph should typically consist of three to five sentences.
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections.
    2. Abbreviations
      1. Check and correct grammatical formatting for abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e.., etc.).
  3. APA style
    1. Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression; use quotation marks only for the first occurrence of the word or phrase, not for subsequent occurrences" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159).
    2. Figures and tables
      1. Figures are very well captioned.
      2. Figure captions use the correct format.
      3. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text.
      4. Table captions should use APA style. See example.
      5. Refer to each Table at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1).
    3. Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example:
      1. If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either:
        1. in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or
        2. in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020)
    4. References use very good APA style.
      1. Page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)

Written expression — Learning features[edit source]

  1. Overall, the use of learning features is excellent.
  2. Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. # No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  3. Excellent use of image(s).
  4. Excellent use of table(s).
  5. Excellent use of feature box(es).
  6. Excellent use of quiz(zes).
  7. Excellent use of examples.

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~11 logged, useful, mostly minor social contributions with direct links to evidence.
  2. ~1 logged social contributions without direct links to evidence, so unable to easily verify and assess.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Wow, I'm blown away - this is an amazingly fantastic presentation!

Overview[edit source]

  1. An opening slide with the title and sub-title is presented and narrated - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. This presentation has a very engaging introduction to hook audience interest .
  3. A context for the topic is established.
  4. The importance of this topic is explained.
  5. Focus questions are presented.

Content[edit source]

  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section.
  2. The presentation addresses the topic.
  3. The presentation is well structured.
  4. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory.
  5. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological research.
  6. The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice.
  7. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information.

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. A Conclusion slide is presented with excellent take-home message(s).

Audio[edit source]

  1. The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to.
  2. Audio communication is clear and well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
  3. Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement.
  4. Audio recording quality was excellent.

Video[edit source]

  1. Overall, visual display quality is amazing.
  2. The presentation makes creative use of homemade animated slides.
  3. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read.
  4. The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time.
  5. The presentation is extremely well produced.

Meta-data[edit source]

  1. The chapter title and sub-title are used in the name of the presentation - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. A written description of the presentation is provided.
  3. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
  4. Links to and from the book chapter are provided.

Licensing[edit source]

  1. A copyright license for the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]