Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2021/Imposter syndrome

Heading casing

FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Love your chapter so much! So, so interesting and super interactive. I thought it was funny that the acronym is IS in my head when I was reading it i just kept repeating "is, is, is, is". --Gracehowie (discuss • contribs) 06:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Hey there, this is a really interesting topic and I can't wait to see how your chapter progresses! I'm not sure if you are still in the process of editing your table, I couldn't see a heading and was a little lost about what it was demonstrating. Here are some helpful links that show tables and how to format them :)) Motivation_and_emotion/Book/2019/Stimming_motivation Motivation_and_emotion/Assessment/Chapter/Tables Good luck with the chapter! --Ashley Sanders01 (discuss • contribs) 12:49, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

I am very interested in this topic as it is something I think a lot of people feel but not acknowledge. My only suggestion at this stage would be to try and make the page a little more interactive. I have attached a link to one of the symptoms as an example. Hope it helps and cannot wait to see how the chapter turns out!--U3167879 (discuss • contribs) 13:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title Excellent Very good Good OK Capitalisation of the title and sub-title has been corrected to be consistent with the book table of contents Author details removed - authorship is as per the page's editing history User page Excellent - used effectively Description about self provided, with link(s) to professional profile(s) - although the eportfolio is private (not sure if that's intentional or not) Link provided to book chapter Social contribution Excellent - summarised with direct link(s) to evidence. Headings Excellent Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic. See earlier comment about Heading casing. Key points Overview: Excellent case study and introduction Consider adding focus questions For sections which include sub-section include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings. Key points are well developed for most sections, with relevant citations. Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters. Direct quotes need page numbers (APA style) - even better, write in your own words. Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) - more info Conclusion (the most important section): promising ideas what might the take-home, practical messages be? Figure A figure is presented. Caption should include Figure X. ... (i.e., italics and period) Cite each figure at least once in the main text. References Very good For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation check formatting of page numbers Resources See also Missing External links Move Wikipedia link to See also Rename links so that they are more user friendly Include source in brackets after link Target an international audience; Australians only represent 0.33% of the world population

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a good chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits. Overview Engaging Overview. Consider developing focus questions to help guide the reader and structure the chapter. Theory — Breadth Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained. The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory. Theory — Depth Good depth is provided about the selected theory(ies). Useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts. Research — Key findings Overall, this chapter provides a good overview of relevant research. Overall, this chapter makes insufficient use of relevant psychological research. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful. Research — Critical thinking Some claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the tags). Insufficient critical thinking about research is evident. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Discussion of theory and research is well integrated. Conclusion A basic Conclusion. Consider adding practical, take-home messages. Written expression — Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is good. Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences. "People" is often a better term than "individuals". "Individuals" is overused in this chapter. Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead: it is, most often, not needed at all, or use section linking. Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags). Grammar-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance. Check and make correct use of commas. Check and correct use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs individuals').[1]. Check and correct use of that vs. who. Proofreading More proofreading is needed to fix typos and bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard. Remove unnecessary capitalisation. Replace double spaces with single spaces. APA style Do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc.. Direct quotes need page numbers. Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression; use quotation marks only for the first occurrence of the word or phrase, not for subsequent occurrences" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159). Figures and tables Refer to each Table and Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation). Use APA style for Table captions. See example. Each Table and Figure is referred to at least once within the main text. Citations use correct APA style. References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Check and correct use of italicisation Page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Written expression — Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is good. Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Excellent/Very good/Good/Basic/One/No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Basic use of image(s). Basic use of table(s). Excellent use of feature box(es). Good use of case studies or examples. Good use of quiz(zes). Social contribution ~20 logged, useful, minor/moderate/major social contributions with direct links to evidence.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 12:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent presentation. The presentation is over the maximum time limit - content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes. Overview This presentation has a very engaging introduction to hook audience interest . A context for the topic is established. Add and narrate a title/sub-title slide, to help the viewer understanding the focus and goal of the presentation. Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. Content The presentation addresses the topic. An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little. The presentation is well structured. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory. The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological research. The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information. Conclusion A Conclusion slide is partially presented with take-home message(s). The Conclusion did not fully fit within the time limit. Audio The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to. The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio. Audio communication is clear and well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point. Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement. Audio recording quality was excellent. Video Overall, visual display quality is excellent. The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read. The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams. The presentation is very well produced. Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title are used in the name of the presentation - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A written description of the presentation is provided. Links to and from the book chapter are provided. Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated. A copyright license for the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:20, 18 November 2021 (UTC)