Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2021/Environment-friendly behaviour motivation

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted User page Excellent - used effectively Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution Summarised with link(s) to evidence Note that for this contribution, the ideal link to evidence is https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMotivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2021%2FGaslighting_and_emotion&type=revision&diff=2315958&oldid=2313871 To add direct links to evidence, do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions. Headings Promising 3-level heading structure - could benefit from further development by expanding the structure Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading - use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Key points Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations Overview - Consider adding: what will be covered an image There seems to be reasonably good coverage of theory; strive to balance with review of relevant research Within the theories section, perhaps consider a third perspective (e.g., values) Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters. Promising use of examples/case studies Conclusion (the most important section): hasn't been developed what might the take-home, practical messages be? in a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions? Direct quotes need page numbers (APA style) Figure Very good A figure is presented Caption uses APA style Caption explains how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text Consider increasing Figure 2 size to make it easier to view References Excellent For APA referencing style, check and correct: doi formatting - hyperlinks should be active Resources See also Excellent External links Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:06, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Suggestions

Hey I have a friend who is really all over conservation of the environment and climate change, and I do allot of personal reading into it because of her. Here is an article I found: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494415300542 --U3202984 (discuss • contribs) 11:43, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a basic, but sufficient chapter. This chapter is well under the maximum word count. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits. Overview The Overview provides a basic outline of the chapter. Clear focus question(s). The third focus question might be better as an open-ended question (have changed). Case study is promising. Consider providing some examples of: behaviours of interest (environment friendly or harmful). theories to be discussed The clarity of written expression is OK, but can be improved. Theory — Breadth The chapter largely discusses EFB in general. More examples of applying the recommended theories to motivate more specific behaviours would be ideal. Three relevant theories are described in relation to EFB. What other theories were considered? e.g., Theory of planned behaviour Goal framing theory Nature connectedness The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory. Theory — Depth Basic coverage is provided about the selected theory(ies). Ideally, the second part of the case study (or a new third part) could provide an example of the suggested theories being successfully applied. Basic use of tables and/or lists to help convey key theoretical information. More examples could be useful to illustrate theoretical principles in action. Research — Key findings Overall, this chapter provides a basic overview of relevant research. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful. Research — Critical thinking Basic critical thinking about research is evident. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Discussion of theory and research is reasonably well integrated. Conclusion The Conclusion provides a basic summary of the chapter. Consider: Reminding the reader about the importance of the problem or phenomenon of interest. Summarising the key points. Adding practical, take-home messages. Written expression — Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is OK. The term "individual" is overused. Two options: "People" is often a better term than "individuals". Often the term isn't needed at all. Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead: it is, most often, not needed at all, or use section linking. Use active rather than passive voice[1][2]. Avoid starting sentences with a citation unless the author is particularly pertinent. Instead, it is more interesting for the the content/key point to be communicated, with the citation included along the way or, more typically, in parentheses at the end of the sentence. Reduce use of weasel words which bulk out the text, but don't enhance meaning. Layout The chapter is reasonably well structured, with major sections using sub-sections. APA style Figures and tables Use APA style for Table captions. See example. Refer to each Table and Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1). Citations use correct APA style. References use correct APA style. Written expression — Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is basic to good. Little use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Basic use of image(s). Basic use of table(s). Good use of feature box(es). Good use of quiz(zes). Good use of case studies or examples. Social contribution ~5 logged, useful, minor/moderate/major social contributions with links to evidence. 1st contribution - link isn't direct, so not considered for markin purposes The uploaded image is at risk of deletion because copyright information hasn't been added. Was it intended to be used in the chapter? Great to see that you contributed to Twitter

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a reasonably good presentation. Overview This presentation has an engaging introduction to hook audience interest. The sub-title is included but the title is missing on the title slide - this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Briefly explain why this topic is important. Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section. Check and correct spelling (e.g., dermination -> determination). Why focus on SDT and self-efficacy? Are these the best theories? (Justify/explain) Self-efficacy - is this about general self-efficacy or more specific self-efficacies? The presentation addresses the topic. An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little. The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological theory. The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological research. The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies (e.g., how do the theories apply to the opening scenario?). Conclusion A Conclusion slide is presented with a basic (general) take-home message. Audio The audio is interesting to listen to. Audio communication is clear and well paced. Good intonation enhances listener interest and engagement. Audio recording quality was OK. Sometimes the microphone might be a bit too close because there is some buffeting/distoration. Video Overall, visual display quality is good. The presentation makes good use of text and image based slides. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read. Consider using a sans-serif typeface to make the text easier to read. The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time. The visual communication is supplemented by images and/or diagrams. The presentation is basically produced using simple tools. Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title are used in the name of the presentation - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. Links to and from the book chapter are provided. Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated. A copyright license for the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:34, 18 November 2021 (UTC)