Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Such an important topic! Changes in workplace characteristics over the last few decades, following technological, social and economic change, may also be affecting work relationships and therefore workplace mental health. Perhaps we need to be sure that workplaces are basing their policies on up to date psychological theories and research. What are some examples of successful applications of new theory and what are some where improvement is needed to develop strategies that meet the contemporary, globalised, world. --Hill Sarah Louise (discuss • contribs) 02:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Promising 2-level heading structure - all sections are focused on the topic.
Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading - use 0 or 2+ sub-headings.
Probably avoid having author names in the headings unless particularly pertinent.
Maybe sections 4 and 5 could be sub-sections of section 3? Also consider shortening these headings to What can individuals do? What can organisations do?
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Wow - excellent work on your book chapter it looks fantastic so far! If you wish to add further information, I know that there is a lot of research on the importance of leadership capability and how leaders directly influence the psychological well-being of employees. I see that you have discussed that the influence of leaders cascades down through the organisation. however, there is also specific research on how transformational leadership behaviours (which are associated with EI) in particular predict employee psychological well-being. This research is also linked to the leader-member exchange theory which is a social exchange theory. Just a note if you’d like to delve into this research at all. --Amy.lange1306 (discuss • contribs) 23:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Relevant theories are well selected, described, integrated, and explained.
A lot of theory is covered. Perhaps being more selective about what to cover, and covering this in a bit more depth, would be helpful.
The case study material is helpful. Perhaps more case studies would help even more - e.g., an organisation which has problems with employee mental health which implements key suggestions from the chapter.
Relevant research is cited and discussed in relation to theory.
When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicating the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Use of major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.
The chapter benefited from a well developed Conclusion.
Layout
The chapter is reasonably well structured, with major sections using sub-sections. Perhaps an additional top-level section would be useful - e.g., what can be done?
Sections which include sub-sections should also include an introductory paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading - use 0 or 2+ sub-headings.
Learning features
Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters.
Excellent use of image(s).
Excellent use of table(s).
Very good use of feature box(es).
Excellent use of quiz(zes).
Some use of case studies or examples.
Grammar
The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags).
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The presentation is interesting to watch and listen to.
The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides with narrated audio.
Well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
Excellent/ intonation to enhance listener interest and engagement.
The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read.
The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images.
The wording of the title/sub-title is inconsistent between the name of the video, the opening slide, and/or the book chapter.
Audio recording quality was a bit tinny - probably an on-board microphone was used because keyboard clicks were audible. Consider using an external microphone.
Visual display quality was excellent.
Mute the music during narration to help the viewer concentrate on the combination of visual information and narrated audio.
Image sources and their copyright status are not provided. Either acknowledge the image sources and their licenses in the video description or remove the presentation.
A more direct link to the music source should be provided.
A copyright license for the presentation is not provided.
A link to the book chapter is provided.
A link from the book chapter is provided.
A written description of the presentation is not provided.