The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Basic, 2-level heading structure - could benefit from further development to limit the focus on background information and expand the focus on the target topic.
Hey! Your chapter is looking great and very interesting. I think lots of students would find this chapter interesting, particularly as it is quite relatable with many students being involved in sport. My suggestion may be to include a few case studies, whether that be based on a made up athlete, or someone that most people would know and can picture. It could really help draw all the ideas presented in your chapter thus far together, and give each reader something further to relate to. --taramaland (discusscontribs) 10:00, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
There is too much general theoretical material. Instead, summarise and link to further information (such as other book chapters or Wikipedia articles), to allow this chapter to focus on the specific topic (i.e., the sub-title question).
Overall, this chapter makes insufficient use of research.
When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicating the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.
Some claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags).
Use 3rd person perspective rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you")[1].
Layout
Sections which include sub-sections should also include an introductory paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
Learning features
No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Limited (one) use of images.
Good use of table(s).
Limited (one) use of feature box(es).
No use of quiz(zes).
Grammar
The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags).
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
Communicate the chapter title and sub-title in both the video title and on the opening slide - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
Audio recording quality was very good.
Visual display quality was very good.
Mute the music during narration to help the viewer concentrate on the combination of visual information and narrated audio.
Image sources and their copyright status are/not provided. Either acknowledge the image sources and their licenses in the video description or remove the presentation.
This presentation has probably violated the copyrights of image owners as images appear to have been used without permission and/or acknowledgement.
A copyright license for the presentation is not provided.
A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the video description but not in the meta-data.
A link to the book chapter is provided.
A link from the book chapter is provided.
A written description of the presentation is not provided.