Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2020/Coping and emotion

Feedback

Hey! I found a page on positive psychology which might be helpful when talking about theories of coping strategies. I have also found a website that provides a brief explanation of the different types of positive psychology interventions which I have used for my own book chapter. I hope this helps! https://positivepsychology.com/positive-psychology-interventions/ --Taylor Mamukic (discuss • contribs) 00:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Hey there! I just wanted to say that it may be beneficial to look at early research on this topic and how it has developed over time. For example, you may find this article helpful. It is titled "the relationship between coping and emotion: implications for theory and research" by Folkman & Lazarus in 1988. you can find it with this link https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0277953688903954

) --U3190016 (discuss • contribs) 12:07, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Title

FYI, I added the title to this page. ---- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:25, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Social Contribution

Hey there, I really hope you manage to finish this, the content is so interesting :) I would suggest adding a couple of more references, as well as making sure you are expanding on all of your brilliant ideas :) Good luck! --U3175502 (discuss • contribs) 07:59, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Heading casing

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for sentence casing. For example, the wikitext should be: == Cats and mice == rather than == Cats and Mice == -- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title Problematic - sub-title didn't match the book table of contents - fixed now. Capitalisation of the title/sub-title has been corrected to be consistent with the book table of contents User page Created About me Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Add link to book chapter Social contribution None summarised with link(s) to evidence. Section headings The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings. Basic, 1-level heading structure - could benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure. Headings need to better match the topic sub-title (which was not about chronic illness). CI could be used as an example or case study. Alternatively, we can negotiate a change of topic. But this chapter is about: "Coping and emotion - What is the relationship between coping and emotion?" Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclus, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections. See earlier comment about Heading casing. Key points Some promising development, but lack of alignment between official sub-title for this page and the planned content. Overview is promising - Consider adding: an example or case study. Remove or adapt generic template content. Consider including more examples/case studies. Conclusion (the most important section) has limited development. Image An image (figure) is presented. Caption does not use APA style. explains how the image connects to key points being made in the main text. Cite each figure at least once in the main text. Consider increasing image size so that it is easier to read. References OK For APA referencing style, check and correct: italicisation doi formatting Resources See also Contains a mixture of internal and external links - move external links to an "External links" section Use bullet-points Rename links so that they are more user friendly Include source in brackets after link Also link to relevant book chapters For more assistance with this, see the skills taught in Tutorial 1

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this chapter does a good job of applying psychological theory and research to a real-world problem. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits. Theory Relevant theories are well selected, described, integrated, and explained. There is too probably much general theoretical material (e.g., about coping and emotion as separate constructs). Instead, summarise and link to further information (such as other book chapters or Wikipedia articles), to allow this chapter to focus on the specific topic (i.e., the sub-title question). Research Overall, this chapter provides a gppd overview of relevant research. Some claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the tags). When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicating the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful. Written expression Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good. Avoid one sentence paragraphs. A paragraph should typically consist of three to five sentences. Learning features Format bullet-points and numbered lists, per Tutorial 1. No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Use in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters. Very good use of image(s). Very good use of table(s). Basic use of feature box(es). No use of quiz(zes). Grammar Use serial commas[1] - they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. Here's a 1 min. explanatory video. Check and make correct use of commas. Spelling Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour). Proofreading Remove unnecessary capitalisation. Replace double spaces with single spaces. APA style Do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc.. Figures and tables Use APA style for Figure captions. See example. Refer to each Table and Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1). Citations are not in full APA style. For example: When citing a source with two authors there should be no comma between the author names. When citing multiple sources in parentheses they should be separated by semi-colons. If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either: in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020) Select up to a maximum of three citations per point (i.e., avoid citing four or more citations to support a single point). References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation. Check and correct use of italicisation. Include hyperlinked dois. Move non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section. Social contribution No logged social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:18, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a reasonably good presentation. Structure and content Comments about the book chapter also apply to this section. An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little. The presentation is well structured. Consider adding and narrating an Overview slide (e.g., with focus questions), to help orientate the viewer about what will be covered. The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory. The presentation makes no use of relevant psychological research. The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies. The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages. Communication The presentation makes basic use of animated slides with narrated audio. The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides with narrated audio. Well paced. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images. Production quality The video is basically produced using simple tools. The chapter title and sub-title are used on the opening slide - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. The chapter sub-title but not the title are used in the name of presentation - the latter would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Audio recording quality was OK but mute the music during narration to help the viewer concentrate on the combination of visual information and narrated audio. Visual display quality was good. Image sources and their copyright status are not provided. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided. A link to the book chapter is provided. A link from the book chapter is provided. A written description of the presentation is not provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)