I am really interested on how you going to discuss this topic.
Especially that we are in the era of social media and online usage. I would say this behaviour is so common with people who have depression or have social anxiety. I think the question that really interests me is what led people to have commitment phobia? This can really make you explore the biology and psychological process (thoughts process).
I hope this gives you something to start with! Cheers!
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Note: Another way to add direct links to evidence: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thank for the message, it was really nice to read. I see your page is coming together nicely, it's an interesting topic and i'm sure a major obstacle for many people. I am still working on the cognitive aspects of a phobia and if I come across anything that might relate to your topic, I will let you know. All the best with your work. --U3162449 (discuss • contribs) 23:25, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this chapter provides a basic overview of relevant research.
When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.
Overall, the quality of written expression is good.
Avoid one sentence paragraphs. A paragraph should typically consist of three to five sentences.
Layout
The chapter uses a basic structure, with major sections using sub-sections.
Learning features
Excellent use of interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. ## No use of embedded links to related book chapters. Embedding interwiki links links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Basic use of images.
Basic use of tables.
Basic use of feature boxes. Increase width of box for quiz questions.
Basic use of quizzes.
The quiz questions could be more effective as learning prompts by being embedded as single questions within each corresponding section rather than being presented as a set of questions at the end.
Promising use of case studies or examples.
Grammar
The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags).
Check and make correct use of commas. In general, commas are overused in this chapter, but there are also instances where they should be used but aren't.
Check and correct use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs individuals').[1].
Proofreading
Replace double spaces with single spaces.
More proofreading is needed to fix typos and bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard.
Remove unnecessary capitalisation.
APA style
Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numerals (e.g., 10).
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
Overall, there is a lot to like about this creative and well constructed presentation. The use of the interview is highly engaging and does a great job of illustrating the key ideas from the book chapter.
The presentation is under the maximum time limit, so there is also time, for example, to reinforce the key points further in the conclusion and potentially also to set the scene a little more in the Overview/Intro.
Use the chapter title and sub-title on the opening slide and in the name of the video because this helps to match the book chapter and to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
Audio and video recording quality was excellent.
Image sources and their copyright status are provided, with appropriate acknowledgement for technical assistance.
A copyright license for the presentation is provided.
A link to the book chapter is provided.
A link from the book chapter is provided.
A written description of the presentation is provided.