Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2019/Ketamine and emotion

Comments

Hi, Awesome start! I would also be super interested in reading about stigma in relation to ketamine. I think it would be informative for readers to understand the major differences between the recreational drug and now the pharmaceutical drug. --U3195279 (discuss • contribs) 05:52, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I found this reference and thought it could be useful for you. It looks at the neural effects of ketamine on those with treatment resistant major depression. Murrough, J., Collins, K., Fields, J., DeWilde, K., Phillips, M., Mathew, J., Wong, E., Tang, C., Charney, D. & Iosifescu, D. (2015). Regulation of neural responses to emotion perception by ketamine in individuals with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder., Translational Psychiatry; 5: 1-7., DOI https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2015.10 --U3175271 (discuss • contribs) 02:36, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I think it would be interesting to look into the way Ketamine effects processing in depression. I have found an interesting article that could be of use. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6070691/ Tahnee Smithers (discuss • contribs) 11:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title Content and capitalisation of the title/sub-title has been corrected to be consistent with the book table of contents User page Created, with description about self Add internal wiki link to book chapter Social contribution Summarised with indirect links to evidence. Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions. Section headings Basic, 2-level heading structure - could benefit from further development e.g., there is no obvious focus on theory and research about the emotional effects of ketamine. Avoid providing too much background information. Instead, briefly summarise generic concepts and provide internal wiki links to further information. Then the focus of most of the content can be on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. Key points Lack of citation Basic development of key points for most sections. Overview - Consider adding focus questions. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters. Consider introducing a case study in the Overview. Consider including more examples/case studies. Consider embedding one quiz question per major section rather than having one longer quiz towards the end. Consider discussing K-hole. Remove overcapitalisation e.g., Ketamine -> ketamine. Image An image (figure) is presented. Caption uses APA style. Caption does not use APA style. Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text. Cite each figure at least once in the main text. References Less than three. Not cited in main text. For full APA style: Use correct italicisation Use the new recommended format for dois - http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2014/07/how-to-use-the-new-doi-format-in-apa-style.html Do not include issue numbers for journals which are continuously numbered within a volume Resources See also Good Also link to relevant book chapters External links Use bullet-points Rename links so that they are more user friendly Describe source in brackets after the link

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:45, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Links

@BellaMurray: Note to use interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (rather than external links). Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:55, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this chapter provides an excellent overview of the psychological effects of ketamine, with some focus on emotion, although perhaps the chapter could be improved by expanding the content about the emotional effects. For additional feedback, see comments below and [ these copyedits]. Theory Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained. Perhaps greater focus on the mechanisms of ketamine leading to effects on emotion (e.g., different emotions) could improve the chapter. Research Relevant research is well reviewed and discussed in relation to theory. When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful (e.g., [1]). Written expression Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is good. Avoid one sentence paragraphs. A paragraph should typically consist of three to five sentences. Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences. Remove redundant wordage (e.g, "It is stated that ..."). Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections. Learning features Use in-text interwiki links, rather than external links. No use of embedded links to related book chapters. Embedding interwiki links links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Very good use of images. Very good use of tables. Good use of feature boxes. Good use of quizzes. The quiz questions could be more effective as learning prompts by being embedded as single questions within each corresponding section rather than being presented as a set of questions at the end. Basic use of case studies or examples. Grammar Use serial commas[2] - it is part of APA style and generally recommended by grammaticists. Check and correct use of affect vs. effect. Check and correct use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs individuals').[3]. APA style Use APA style to refer to each Table and each Figure (e.g., do not use italics). Use APA style for Figure captions. See example. References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation. See new doi format. Social contribution ~1 logged, useful, social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:37, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an effective, basic presentation. Structure and content Well selected content - not too much or too little. The presentation is well structured (Title, Body, Conclusion). The presentation is poorly structured. In particular, it lacks a Title, Overview, and Conclusion. Add and narrate an Overview slide, to help orientate the viewer about what will be covered. Communication The presentation is easy to follow. The presentation makes basic use of text-based slides. Well paced. Some of the font size should be larger to make it easier to read. The visual communication could be improved by including some relevant images. Production quality Use the chapter title and sub-title on the opening slide and in the name of the video because this helps to match the book chapter and to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Audio recording quality was a bit quiet - review microphone set-up. Video recording quality was basic but good. A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the video description but not in the meta-data. A link to the book chapter is provided. A link from the book chapter is provided. A written description of the presentation is not provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:57, 17 November 2019 (UTC)