Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2019/False confession motivation

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comments[edit source]

Hi just a quick suggestion to enlarge your image size. Currently it is hard to view so making it bigger might make it easier to read. --BMPENFOLD (discusscontribs) 02:38, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, if you're looking at adding a case study to your page this could be a really interesting one with a fair bit of information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Park_jogger_case

I think the topic of False confession motivation will be really interesting to research and write your book chapter about. I can tell by your chapter plan that you have put a lot of effort into the assessment and are interested in your chosen topic. If you have taken the unit 'Cognitive Psychology', I would recommend that you review the assigned textbook which provides information as to why individuals make errors in eyewitness testimony. I believe this chapter references motivations for false confession making, and can provide inspiration. It is a good example of your topic and may provide you with guidance as you progress with your textbook chapter. Please see the reference below: Goldstein, E. (2015). Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research, and Everyday Experience(4th ed., pp. 231-236). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning. --Emilymking (discusscontribs) 12:05, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like a really solid topic development. I like your subheading and and 'pretty boxes'. I would like to suggest an article to contribute to your research on false confessions. Hope the rest of your book chapter is going well behind the scenes.

http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=79a62618-b198-4139-a966-6863fef00fbe%40sessionmgr4006&bdata=#AN=2016-25879-001&db=pdh

--U3100384 (discusscontribs) 01:02, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Personality disorders[edit source]

Hi, I came across a news article recently about a woman who may have made false statements during interrogation. The news article mentioned Dependent Personality Disorder and how people with this disorder want to please authority figures. I think this could be an interesting disorder to include in your book chapter, or as a real life example on the side of your chapter. I found an article which linked this disorder to wanting to please authority figures, which I've referenced below.

Dependent personality disorder. (2007). Harvard Health Publications. The Harvard Mental Health Letter. Retrieved from https://ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/docview/1370191185?accountid=28889

Kaylah-3163515 (discusscontribs) 23:13, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title[edit source]

  1. Excellent

User page[edit source]

  1. Created, with description about self
  2. Add link to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Excellent

Section headings[edit source]

  1. Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic.

Key points[edit source]

  1. Key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations.
  2. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles.
  3. Consider introducing a case study/example in the Overview.
  4. Consider embedding one quiz question per major section rather than having one longer quiz towards the end.

Image[edit source]

  1. Provided, with an APA style caption
  2. Consider enhancing figure captions to help connect the image more strongly to key points being made in the text
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text.

References[edit source]

  1. Good.
  2. For full APA style:
    1. Use correct capitalisation
    2. Do not include issue numbers for journals which are continuously numbered within a volume

Resources[edit source]

  1. Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:07, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment[edit source]

Hey, if you're looking at adding a case study to your page this could be a really interesting one with a fair bit of information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Park_jogger_case --U3160373 (discusscontribs) 12:07, 14 October 2019 (UTC) U3160373[reply]


Chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. For additional feedback, see comments below and these copyedits.

Theory[edit source]

  1. Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained.

Research[edit source]

  1. Relevant research is well reviewed and discussed in relation to theory.

Written expression[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent.
    2. Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned").
    3. Avoid one sentence paragraphs. A paragraph should typically consist of three to five sentences.
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections.
  3. Learning features
    1. For numbered lists, use Wikiversity formatting per Tutorial 1.
    2. Excellent use of interwiki links to Wikipedia articles.
    3. No use of embedded links to related book chapters. Embedding interwiki links links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
    4. Basic use of images.
    5. Basic use of tables.
    6. Excellent use of feature boxes.
    7. Excellent use of quizzes.
    8. Excellent use of case studies or examples.
  4. Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are excellent.
  5. APA style
    1. Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numerals (e.g., 10).
    2. Direct quotes need page numbers.
    3. Figures and tables
      1. Use APA style for Table captions. See example.
      2. Refer to each Table and Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1).
    4. References are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. Check and correct use of capitalisation.
      2. Check and correct use of italicisation.

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~5 logged, minor, useful, social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 12:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent presentation.
  2. This presentation makes effective use of relatively simple animation and text slide tools.

Structure and content[edit source]

  1. Many of the comments about the book chapter also apply to this section.
  2. Well selected content - not too much or too little.
  3. The presentation is well structured (Title, Overview, Body, Conclusion).
  4. A Conclusion slide is presented with a take-home message(s).

Communication[edit source]

  1. The presentation is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to watch and listen to.
  2. The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides with narrated audio.
  3. Well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
  4. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images.

Production quality[edit source]

  1. The chapter sub-title are used in the video title - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Also include the title.
  2. The chapter title and sub-title are used on the opening slides - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  3. Audio recording quality was excellent.
  4. Video recording quality was excellent.
  5. Image sources and their copyright status are not provided.
  6. A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the video description but not in the meta-data.
  7. A link to the book chapter is provided.
  8. A link from the book chapter is provided.
  9. A written description of the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:39, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]