Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2018/Meat-eating motivation

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Book Chapter Suggestions[edit]

Hey there, this sounds like a super interesting topic! Research seems to be a bit thin on the 'meat-eating' motivation isn't it? However, I was able to find this article on implicit attitudes that might help with your research. Hope your chapter goes well! --U3117719 (discusscontribs) 05:11, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Contribution 2[edit]

Hi, such an interesting topic! From a cultural perspective it might be interesting to look at the motivations of diets within Eastern cultures such as Hinduism (with the Hindu people often eating a meat based diet with the exception of eating cows). There is also this recent study that might be helpful, the article looks at the motivations of young vegetarians, low, medium and high meat-eaters. [Aiking, H., Boer, J. d., & Schosler, H. (2017). Towards a reduced meat diet: Mindset and motivation of young vegetarians, low, medium and high meat-eaters. Appetite, 113, 387-397. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.007]. --U3143109 (discusscontribs) 09:23, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi there, this is a super interesting topic, and really unusual! You've picked a good one! The meat paradox sounds especially interesting, I'm keen to read more about it when you finish your chapter. I really like how you made a note to 'look for a lss political source' as obviously this topic can get pretty controversial, so it's great to see you're keeping it as unbiased and factual as possible! Good luck! --U3142860 (discusscontribs) 01:39, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

This is such a great topic. I think that cognitive dissonance about people who fight for animal rights but still continue to eat meat would be very interesting. This article discuss' this further and may be helfpul for you to look into: https://foodethics.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/inst_ethik_wiss_dialog/Loughnan_2010_The_role_of_meat_consumption_.._denial_of_moral_status.pdf This is an idea also, you may want to lay out your page as a for and against- so, people's motivation for eating meat and people's motivation for not eating meat. This seems like a logical structure to me. However, you may have already thought of a better structure, so this is simply a suggestion. Can't wait to read the finsihed product TaylorMal (discusscontribs) 01:25, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

i really enjoy this topic and how you have presented it. i agree that looking at cognitive dissonance would be an interesting topic to look at! this article may help you https://ac-els-cdn-com.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/S0195666317305329/1-s2.0-S0195666317305329-main.pdf?_tid=5134bdae-4664-4f8f-9e98-d7a7bbde1897&acdnat=1539216275_e8f3b436fa9394942960e6f06ee6bcf4. I am doing a book chapter on cognitive dissonance and emotion so feel free to look at my page as well if you are unsure about dissonance as a theory. Joog 17 (discusscontribs) 1:37, 21 October 2018 (UTC)


Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via Canvas. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Autoroute icone.svg

Title, sub-title, TOC[edit]

  1. Title and sub-title weren't included; have added them

User page[edit]

  1. Good

Social contribution[edit]

  1. Good
  2. See suggestions for how to record social contributions

Section headings[edit]

  1. Overall, logical, useful structure
  2. Overview - merge with Introduction (have done this) - or give the Intro a more topic-based name

Key points[edit]

  1. Overall, well developed
  2. Conclusion - under-developed - this is the most important section

Image[edit]

  1. Use APA style for image captions
  2. The other suggested image probably isn't licensed for re-use

References[edit]

  1. Missing

Resources[edit]

  1. OK
  2. External links - see external links. Also include info about source/destination in brackets after the hyperlink - see example

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:51, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Heading casing[edit]

Crystal Clear app ktip.svg
FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings (or sentence casing). For example, use:

==Cats and dogs==

rather than

==Cats and Dogs==

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:52, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback[edit]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Wikiuutiset logo typewriter.png

Overall[edit]

  1. Overall, this is a promising, well-written chapter that could be improved by reporting research in more detail and some improving aspects of the written expression and layout.
  2. For additional feedback, see comments below and these copyedits.

Theory[edit]

  1. Some relevant theories is covered; perhaps more could be consider, or the theories could be covered in more depth.

Research[edit]

  1. Relevant research is well reviewed and discussed in relation to theory. Perhaps it could be improved by discussing this research in more depth.
  2. Some statements are unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags).

Written expression[edit]

  1. Layout
    1. See earlier comments about heading casing.
    2. Sections which include sub-sections should also include an introductory paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
  2. Learning features
    1. Interwiki links are well used.
    2. Minimal to no use of images, tables, feature boxes, quizzes, case studies or examples.
  3. Spelling, grammar, and proofreading.
    1. Check and make correct use of commas.
    2. Use serial commas.
    3. Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour).
  4. APA style
    1. Use APA style for Figure captions.
    2. Citations
      1. For APA style, citations in parentheses use a comma between the author(s) and year
      2. When there are three or more authors, subsequent citations should use et al. e.g., Smith, Bush and Western (2001) and thereafter cite Smith et al. (2001).
      3. Use ampersand (&) inside brackets and "and" outside brackets.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:52, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Multimedia.png

Overall[edit]

  1. Overall, this is a basic, but sufficient presentation.

Structure and content[edit]

  1. Many of the comments about the book chapter also apply to this section.
  2. Well selected and structured content - not too much or too little.
  3. The presentation is well structured (Title, Overview, Body, Conclusion).
  4. What are the practical take-home messages?
  5. References?

Communication[edit]

  1. Well paced. Excellent intonation.
  2. The presentation is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to watch and listen to.
  3. Text is easy to read, with relevant accompanying images.

Production quality[edit]

  1. Publishing to youtube would probably make this more user-friendly.
  2. Hide the recording bar.
  3. Use the full chapter title and sub-title on the opening slide and in the name of the video because this helps to match the book chapter and to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  4. Audio recording had some background noise - review microphone set up.
  5. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided.
  6. A link to the book chapter is not provided.
  7. No written description of the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:00, 29 November 2018 (UTC)