Template:METF/2022

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Feedback template for the topic development exercise for the motivation and emotion unit. Designed to be transcluded on a chapter talk page.

Simple example

Simple example

See also detailed example

<!-- Official topic development feedback -->
{{METF/2022
|1=
<!-- Title -->
#
|2=
<!-- User page -->
#
|3=
<!-- Social contribution -->
#
|4=
<!-- Headings -->
#
|5=
<!-- Key points-->
#
|6=
<!-- Figure -->
#
|7=
<!-- References -->
#
|8=
<!-- Resources -->
#
}}
~~~~

gives


Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title

User page

Social contribution

Headings

Key points

Figure

References

Resources

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:42, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Detailed example

Example use of the template which includes some commonly provided feedback comments:

<!-- Official topic development feedback -->
{{METF/2022
|1=
<!-- Title -->
# The title is correctly worded and formatted
# The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted
# The wording and/or capitalisation of the title is incorrect. Be consistent with the [[Motivation and emotion/Book/2022|book table of contents]].
# The wording and/or capitalisation of the sub-title is incorrect. Be consistent with the [[Motivation and emotion/Book/2022|book table of contents]].
# Remove author name – authorship is as per the page's editing history
|2=
<!-- User page -->
# Excellent – used effectively
# Very good
# Good
# Created – minimal, but sufficient
# Not created – see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]]
# Excellent description about self provided
# Description about self provided – consider expanding
# Brief description about self provided – consider expanding
# Very brief description about self provided – consider expanding
# Add description about self
# Link(s) provided to professional profile(s)
# Consider linking to your [https://portfolio.canberra.edu.au/ eportfolio] page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as [https://www.linkedin.com/ LinkedIn]. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
# Link provided to book chapter
# Link provided to book chapter (rename to make it more user-friendly)
# Add link to book chapter
|3=
<!-- Social contribution -->
# Excellent – at least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence
# At least one contribution has been made and summarised with indirect link(s) to evidence
# If adding the second or subsequent link to a page, create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Chapter#Making and summarising social contributions|Making and summarising social contributions]].
# Great to see you on Twitter!
# Use a numbered list (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
# Add a brief summary of each contribution
# None summarised with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Physiological needs#Social contributions|Tutorial 03]]. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for [[Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Chapter#socialcontribution|social contributions]].
|4=
<!-- Headings -->
# See earlier comment about [[#heading casing|Heading casing]]
# Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic
# Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure
# Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure
# Basic, 1-level heading structure – would benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure
# Under-developed, 1-level heading structure – develop further, perhaps using a 2-level structure for the larger section(s)
# Overly complicated 3-level structure – consider simplifying
# It makes logical sense to use the sub-title questions as top-level headings. Consider further development of sub-headings in those sections.
# Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
# The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings
# Use default heading formatting (i.e., avoid bold, italics, underline, changing the size etc.)
# Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings
|5=
<!-- Key points-->
# Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations
# Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
# Basic development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
# Use bullet points (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
# For sections which include sub-sections include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
# Overview - Consider adding:
## a brief, evocative description of the problem
## focus questions
## an image
## an example or case study
# ''Avoid providing too much background information''. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on ''directly answering the core question(s)'' posed by the chapter sub-title.
# Good balance of theory and research
# Promising balance of theory and research
# There seems to be reasonably good coverage of theory, however, strive to balance the content with critical review of relevant research
# Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research
# Excellent use of in-text [[m:Help:Interwiki linking|interwiki links]] for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
# Promising use of in-text [[m:Help:Interwiki linking|interwiki links]] for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
# Include in-text [[m:Help:Interwiki linking|interwiki links]] for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
# Excellent use of examples/case studies
# Promising use of examples/case studies
# Consider including more examples/case studies
# Use APA style 7th edition for citations with three or more authors (i.e., FirstAuthor et al., year)
# Direct quotes need page numbers (APA style) – even better, write in your own words
# Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) – [https://polishedpaper.com/blog/capitalization-apa-style more info]
# Write the chapter using [https://www.aresearchguide.com/write-in-third-person.html 3rd person perspective], although a case study or feature box could use 1st or 2nd person perspective
# Use [https://www.abc.net.au/education/learn-english/australian-vs-american-spelling/11244196 Australian spelling] (e.g., analyze -> analyse; behavior -> behaviour)
# Move references into the References section. Keep citations in the main body.
# Conclusion (the most important section):
## Well developed
## Underway
## Under developed
## Hasn't been developed
## What might the take-home, practical messages be?
## In a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?
# Generally well-written, but I recommend using the [https://uclearn.canberra.edu.au/courses/501/external_tools/262?display=borderless Studiosity] service and/or a service like [https://www.grammarly.com/ Grammarly] to help improve the quality of written expression because there are a lot of grammatical and spelling errors.
|6=
<!-- Figure -->
# Excellent – A relevant figure is presented and it is appropriately captioned
# Well done on creating and uploading your own image! {{smile}} – this can also be listed as a social contribution
# A relevant figure is presented
# A relevant figure is not presented and cited
# The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
# Caption should include ''Figure X''. ...
# Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
# Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text
# Cite each figure at least once in the main text
# Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view
# Consider decreasing image size to make it less dominant in relation to the text
|7=
<!-- References -->
# Excellent
# Very good
# Good
# OK
# For [https://apastyle.apa.org/instructional-aids/reference-guide.pdf APA referencing style], check and correct:
## alphabetical order
## capitalisation
## [[Help:Wikitext quick reference|italicisation]]
## [https://apastyle.apa.org/instructional-aids/reference-guide.pdf doi formatting]
## make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
## page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
# None
# Remember that the goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic
# Use either APA style or wiki referencing style, but not both. Currently, a mixture of referencing styles is used.
|8=
<!-- Resources -->
# See also
## Excellent
## Very good
## Use bullet-points (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
## Use [[w:Letter case#Sentence casing|sentence casing]]
## Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
## Include source in brackets after link
## Also link to related book chapters
## Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages
## Not developed
# External links
## Excellent
## Very good
## OK
## Use bullet-points (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
## Use [[w:Letter case#Sentence casing|sentence casing]]
## Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see [[Motivation and emotion/Tutorials/Wiki editing|Tutorial 02]])
## Include source in brackets after link
## Target an international audience; Australians only represent 0.33% of the world population
## Not developed
}}
~~~~

gives


Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title

  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted
  3. The wording and/or capitalisation of the title is incorrect. Be consistent with the book table of contents.
  4. The wording and/or capitalisation of the sub-title is incorrect. Be consistent with the book table of contents.
  5. Remove author name – authorship is as per the page's editing history

User page

  1. Excellent – used effectively
  2. Very good
  3. Good
  4. Created – minimal, but sufficient
  5. Not created – see Tutorial 02
  6. Excellent description about self provided
  7. Description about self provided – consider expanding
  8. Brief description about self provided – consider expanding
  9. Very brief description about self provided – consider expanding
  10. Add description about self
  11. Link(s) provided to professional profile(s)
  12. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  13. Link provided to book chapter
  14. Link provided to book chapter (rename to make it more user-friendly)
  15. Add link to book chapter

Social contribution

  1. Excellent – at least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence
  2. At least one contribution has been made and summarised with indirect link(s) to evidence
  3. If adding the second or subsequent link to a page, create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
  4. Great to see you on Twitter!
  5. Use a numbered list (see Tutorial 02)
  6. Add a brief summary of each contribution
  7. Add your signature to comments on talk/discussion pages
  8. None summarised with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.

Headings

  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic
  3. Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure
  4. Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure
  5. Basic, 1-level heading structure – would benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure
  6. Under-developed, 1-level heading structure – develop further, perhaps using a 2-level structure for the larger section(s)
  7. Overly complicated 3-level structure – consider simplifying
  8. It makes logical sense to use the sub-title questions as top-level headings. Consider further development of sub-headings in those sections.
  9. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  10. The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings
  11. Use default heading formatting (i.e., avoid bold, italics, underline, changing the size etc.)
  12. Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings

Key points

  1. Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations
  2. Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
  3. Basic development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
  4. Use bullet points (see Tutorial 02)
  5. For sections which include sub-sections include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
  6. Overview - Consider adding:
    1. a brief, evocative description of the problem
    2. focus questions
    3. an image
    4. an example or case study
  7. Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
  8. Good balance of theory and research
  9. Promising balance of theory and research
  10. There seems to be reasonably good coverage of theory, however, strive to balance the content with critical review of relevant research
  11. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research
  12. Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  13. Promising use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapter
  14. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  15. Excellent use of examples/case studies
  16. Promising use of examples/case studies
  17. Consider including more examples/case studies
  18. Use APA style 7th edition for citations with three or more authors (i.e., FirstAuthor et al., year)
  19. Direct quotes need page numbers (APA style) – even better, write in your own words
  20. Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) – more info
  21. Write the chapter using 3rd person perspective, although a case study or feature box could use 1st or 2nd person perspective
  22. Use Australian spelling (e.g., analyze -> analyse; behavior -> behaviour)
  23. Move references into the References section. Keep citations in the main body.
  24. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Well developed
    2. Underway
    3. Under developed
    4. Hasn't been developed
    5. What might the take-home, practical messages be?
    6. In a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?
  25. Generally well-written, but I recommend using the Studiosity service and/or a service like Grammarly to help improve the quality of written expression because there are a lot of grammatical and spelling errors.

Figure

  1. Excellent – A relevant figure is presented and it is appropriately captioned
  2. Well done on creating and uploading your own image! – this can also be listed as a social contribution
  3. A relevant figure is presented
  4. A relevant figure is not presented and cited
  5. The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
  6. Caption should include Figure X. ...
  7. Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
  8. Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text
  9. Cite each figure at least once in the main text
  10. Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view
  11. Consider decreasing image size to make it less dominant in relation to the text

References

  1. Excellent
  2. Very good
  3. Good
  4. OK
  5. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. alphabetical order
    2. capitalisation
    3. italicisation
    4. doi formatting
    5. make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
    6. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
  6. None
  7. Remember that the goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic
  8. Use either APA style or wiki referencing style, but not both. Currently, a mixture of referencing styles is used.

Resources

  1. See also
    1. Excellent
    2. Very good
    3. Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)
    4. Use sentence casing
    5. Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see Tutorial 02)
    6. Include source in brackets after link
    7. Also link to related book chapters
    8. Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages
    9. Not developed
  2. External links
    1. Excellent
    2. Very good
    3. OK
    4. Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)
    5. Use sentence casing
    6. Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see Tutorial 02)
    7. Include source in brackets after link
    8. Target an international audience; Australians only represent 0.33% of the world population
    9. Not developed

See also