Talk:WikiJournal of Medicine/Medical gallery of Mikael Häggström 2014

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

WikiJournal of Medicine logo.svg

WikiJournal of Medicine
Wikipedia-integrated • Public peer review • Libre open access

WikiJournal of Medicine is an open-access, free-to-publish, Wikipedia-integrated academic journal for Medical and Biomedical topics. <seo title=" WJM, WikiJMed, Wiki.J.Med., WikiJMed, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, WikiJournal Medicine, Wikipedia Medicine, Wikipedia medical journal, WikiMed, Wikimedicine, Wikimedical, Medicine, Biomedicine, Free to publish, Open access, Open-access, Non-profit, online journal, Public peer review "/>

<meta name='citation_doi' value='10.15347/wjm/2014.008'>

Article information

Author: Mikael Häggström ORCID iD.svg 

Häggström, M. Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)



Previous discussions about this work is found at My talk page in Wikipedia. Mikael Häggström (discusscontribs) 18:24, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

2014-07 Peer review of medical gallery of Mikael Häggström.pdf


Reviewer-annotated pdf file.

Review by Helena Scheele-Sandström ,
This review refers to this previous version of the article

Peer review submitted as PDF


The mentioned images are now removed from the article. Mikael Häggström (discusscontribs) 18:19, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Post-publication peer review

Including images

Content taken from published sources that is adapted by relabeling, redrawing, etc., is acceptable if you cite the source when the image is used.

Content that you generate yourself, in the laboratory, or otherwise, is ENTIRELY unacceptable at Wikipedia, as it amounts to prohibited WP:Original research. Given the seeming WP:OR that is rampant with your images, and the negative peer review that casts a further shadow over their reliability, I will begin to look at each, and where they are used, and tag them as inappropriate (if you do no provide sources for derived work, and remove work that is WP:OR).

This is an example of a lack of clear guidance from wikipedia regarding doing honest scholarly work, that you have taken to a logical, albeit damaging extreme. You should be generating images from scholars, and not involving your own research and interpretation.

Le Prof Leprof 7272 (discusscontribs) 23:42, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

This discussion relates to Wikipedia, so further discussion takes place at the corresponding entry there. Mikael Häggström (discusscontribs) 17:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)