Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Tinnitus and emotion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (expand)
  2. Very good alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure, but there may be room for improvement
  3. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  1. Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  2. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
  3. Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings
  1. Promising development of key points for each section
  2. Lack of sufficient citations
  3. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  4. Conclusion is underway
  1. Excellent - One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented, captioned, and cited
  2. The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
  3. Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text
  1. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2)
  2. Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Consider use of more scenarios/examples/case studies
  4. Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages
  5. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. Insufficient
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  1. See also
    1. One of two link types provided
      1. Also link to related book chapters
  2. External links
    1. Very good
    2. Use sentence casing
    3. Use alphabetical order
  1. Basic – minimal, but sufficient
  2. Very brief description about self – consider expanding
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. An external link to the book chapter is provided
  5. Change this to an internal link (see Tutorial 02)
  1. One out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence. The other types of contribution are making:

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:59, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is a very good presentation
  1. The opening does not adequately convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest (e.g., through an example)
  3. Establish a context for the presentation (e.g., use an example or explain importance)
  4. Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation
  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation addresses the topic
  3. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory
  4. The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological research
  5. The presentation makes insufficient/no use of citations to support claims
  6. The presentation makes excellent use of examples
  7. The presentation provides useful practical advice
  8. The presentation provides easy to understand information
  1. The conclusion provides a summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic
  2. The conclusion provides basic take-home message(s)
  1. The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to
  2. The presentation makes very good use of narrated audio
  3. Audio communication is well-paced
  4. Excellent/Very good/Good/Reasonably good/Basic intonation
  5. The narration is well practiced and/or performed
  6. Audio recording quality was excellent
  7. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic
  1. Overall, visual display quality is excellent
  2. The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides
  3. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
  4. The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time
  5. The visual communication is supplemented in a very good way by relevant images and/or diagrams
  6. The presentation is well produced using simple tools
  7. The visual content is well matched to the target topic
  1. The correct title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. This would help to convey the purpose of the presentation and be consistent.
  2. A reasonably good written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
  3. An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account doesn't have advanced features)
  4. A link from the book chapter is provided
  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated
  2. Provide clickable links to the image sources and license details (e.g., in the description)
  3. A copyright license for the presentation is in the description but not in the license field

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply