Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Tinnitus and emotion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted
  1. Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (expand)
  2. Very good alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure, but there may be room for improvement
  3. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  1. Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  2. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
  3. Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings
  1. Promising development of key points for each section
  2. Lack of sufficient citations
  3. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  4. Conclusion is underway
  1. Excellent - One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented, captioned, and cited
  2. The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
  3. Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text
  1. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (see Tutorial 2)
  2. Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Consider use of more scenarios/examples/case studies
  4. Consider including one or more quiz question(s) about the take-home messages
  5. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. Insufficient
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  1. See also
    1. One of two link types provided
      1. Also link to related book chapters
  2. External links
    1. Very good
    2. Use sentence casing
    3. Use alphabetical order
  1. Basic – minimal, but sufficient
  2. Very brief description about self – consider expanding
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. An external link to the book chapter is provided
  5. Change this to an internal link (see Tutorial 02)
  1. One out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence. The other types of contribution are making:

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:59, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply