Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Sound and perception of food and drink

Initial suggestions

@Ebrixon: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Hunger
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Sound
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Thirst
• Also search past book chapters for related topics
• For the topic development, consider:
  • What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic?
  • What is the main research in this area?
• Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

@Ebixon This is a super interesting chapter and involves similar concepts to my chapter on sense hacking.

I especially like the Case study: Jessica's Dining Experience and how senses can interact and influence each other. I know its late in the game but some research that I've used and found about sensory processing and dining experiences can be found below. You may find it applies and can be applied as evidence for this case study.

Spence, C. (2011). The multi-sensory experience of food: What do we know? Food Quality and Preference, 22(6), 487-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.01.005 U3081293 (discuss • contribs) 02:59, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development and/or refinement Consider renaming "Introduction ..." heading. The Overview should provide a general introduction. Then get into the substantive content (i.e., addressing the focus questions). Adopt closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings Quiz doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed quiz questions within relevant sections 3. Overview Very good Abbreviate Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest Abbreviate the scenario (or split and present other parts later on) Simplify/abbreviate the description of the problem/topic. Move detail into subsequent sections. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended Open-ended focus questions are usually better than closed-ended (e.g., yes/no) questions 4. Key points Key points are well developed for each section Excellent use of citations Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Avoid providing too much background information. Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. Conclusion (the most important section) hasn't been developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) 5. Figure One or more relevant figure(s) presented, captioned, and cited The figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text 6. Learning feature Promising use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Excellent use of quiz question(s) Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Very good Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? Check and correct APA referencing style: italicisation page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) 8. Resources See also Very good (I've adjusted formatting) External links One of two required external links provided 9. User page Good Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution At least three different types of contributions with two of three contributions supported by direct link(s) to evidence To add direct links to evidence of Wikiversity edits or comments: view the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and paste the comparison URL on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. Excellent use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon Clear focus questions Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds effectively on related chapters and Wikipedia articles Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Use tables, figures, and/or lists to help convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Excellent review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Very good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Claims are well referenced Integration Excellent integration between theory and research Conclusion Excellent summary and conclusion Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent Avoid starting sentences with a citation unless the author is particularly pertinent. Instead, it is more interesting for the the content/key point to be communicated, with the citation included along the way or, more typically, in parentheses at the end of the sentence. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are excellent Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats')[2] Check and correct use of semicolons (;) and colons (:) APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used ... as slang, or as an invented or coined expression" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159) Figures Very well captioned Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text Citations use excellent APA style (7th ed.) References use excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic/poor APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation[3] Learning features Excellent use of learning features Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles Excellent use of image(s) Good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section Social contribution ~9 logged, useful, mostly moderate/major social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent presentation The presentation is over the maximum time limit — content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes Overview The opening clearly conveys the purpose of the presentation Very engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes excellent use of citations to support claims The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples The presentation provides useful practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides an excellent summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic The conclusion provides excellent take-home message(s) The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit Audio The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio Audio communication is well-paced Very good intonation The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was excellent Consider using an external microphone. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is excellent The presentation makes creative use of stock video, images, text, and/or animation The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in an excellent way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is very well produced The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The correct title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation An excellent written description of the presentation is provided A link to the book chapter is not provided A link from the book chapter is provided The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This creates limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info. Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is in the description but not in the license field

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)