Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Life satisfaction and personality

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Initial suggestions

[edit source]

@U3242288: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:* Breadth vs. depth. This is a broad topic, which is fine, but it will need to be an overview, with embedded links to more specific chapters. However, if you find that you are interested in a specific aspect of this topic we can also tailor a different, more specific topic.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and/or sub-title were not correctly worded and/or formatted. This has been corrected.
  2. User name removed – authorship is as per the list of topics and the page's editing history
  1. There is too much background info (about LS and P as separate constructs) and too little about their relationship
  2. Heading structure needs work
  3. Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  1. A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section
  2. Add an image to the scenario or case study to help attract reader interest
  3. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
  4. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended
  5. Focus the questions on the relationship between LS and P
  6. Open-ended focus questions are usually better than closed-ended (e.g., yes/no) questions
  7. Put the focus questions in a feature box at the end of the Overview
  1. Partial development of key points for some sections, with some relevant citations
  2. It is unclear whether the best available psychological theory and research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan
  3. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Hasn't been developed
  1. Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited
  2. Consider the difference between happiness and life satisfaction
  1. One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies)
  3. Promising use of quiz question(s)
  4. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information
  1. Very good
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links
  4. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. italicisation
  1. See also
    1. Excellent
    2. Use sentence casing
  2. External links
    1. Excellent
  1. Very good
  2. Brief description about self – consider expanding
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter
  1. One out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence
  2. The other types of contribution are making:
    1. comments on chapters (past or current)
    2. posts about the unit or project on other platforms

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply