Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Fear of judgement and social media

Initial suggestions

@Ashdruett: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Fear
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Social media
• Also search past book chapters for related topics
• For the topic development, consider:
  • What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic?
  • What is the main research in this area?
• Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you James! I really appreciate your assistance Ashdruett (discuss • contribs) 11:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Feedback

Wow this topic is so interesting! As someone who experiences this persoanlly, it will be really good to read the final product to see if it will be able to help me overcome this problem! Your development is looking really good. U3200844 (discuss • contribs) 13:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title is correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings Promising, 1-level heading structure – could benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure I think there might be next level headings, but these are formatted as bold rather than as headings (see Tutorial 2) Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended 4. Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations Use bullet-points per Tutorial 2 Promising balance of theory and research. Conclusion (the most important section): Well developed 5. Figure Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited Note that "figure" should be "Figure"; similarly "table" should be "Table" 6. Learning feature Promising use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Promising use of quiz question(s) Promising use of table(s) 7. References Very good Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? For APA referencing style, check and correct: italicisation 8. Resources See also Excellent External links Very good Select only the most relevant external links about this topic Move academic sources into references (and cite) 9. User page Excellent – used effectively Excellent description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter 10. Social contribution Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence If adding the second or subsequent link to a page (or a talk/discussion page), create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:27, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. Very good to excellent use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims; there are perhaps some claims/places which could be better cited Overview Well developed Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Explains the problem or phenomenon The focus questions could be improved by being more specific to the topic (i.e., include social media) Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds effectively on related chapters and Wikipedia articles Embedded external links should be moved to the External links section or into References if they are academic sources Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Effective use of tables, figures, and/or lists are to help clearly convey key theoretical information Table 1 could be improved by tailoring it to social media Very good use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Very good/ review of relevant research More emphasis on social media studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Excellent critical thinking about relevant research is evident Integration Excellent integration between theory and research Conclusion Excellent summary and conclusion Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see tags) Spelling Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour) APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Direct quotes need page numbers Figures Figures are very well captioned Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text Tables Table captions use APA style or wiki style Citations use very good APA style (7th ed.). Some times "and" instead of "&" is used References use excellent APA style Learning features Excellent use of learning features Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles Move links to non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section or into references Excellent use of image(s) I thought there might be more images of people using social media? Very good use of table(s) Very good use of feature box(es) Very good use of case studies or examples Very good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Very good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Very good use of external links in the "External links" section Use alphabetical order Social contribution ~13 logged, useful, moderate social contributions with some direct and some semi-direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent presentation Overview The opening slide Displays the title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation Does not display the sub-title — this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation Narrates the title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation Does not narrate the sub-title — this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation Very engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes no use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes no use of citations to support claims The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples The presentation provides practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides an basic summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic The conclusion provides excellent take-home message(s) Audio The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio Audio communication is well-paced Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was excellent The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is excellent The presentation makes creative use of webcam, stock video, and/or animation The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is effectively supplemented by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is very well produced Meta-data The correct title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. This would help to convey the purpose of the presentation and be consistent. An excellent written description of the presentation is provided An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account doesn't have advanced features) A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is not clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:37, 7 November 2024 (UTC)