Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Emotion preferences

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title is correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure Good alignment between focus questions and heading structure Consider adopting closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings Use default heading formatting (i.e., avoid bold, italics, underline, changing the size etc.) Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Definition(s) tend to be pedestrian headings. Incorporate definitional material into the Overview and/or subsequent sections with embedded inter-wiki link(s) to further information. Case study doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed case study within relevant sections Quiz doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed quiz questions within relevant sections 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions Focus questions are reasonably well aligned with sub-title and top-level headings Maybe add what are emotion preferences? FQ three is a big vague Copyedit/proofread FQ four 4. Key points Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations Direct quotes need page numbers (APA style) – even better, write in your own words APA style uses double rather than single quotation marks Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed 5. Figure Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited 6. Learning feature One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc. 7. References Excellent 8. Resources See also Excellent External links Excellent 9. User page Very good Brief description about self provided – consider expanding Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter 10. Social contribution Two out of three different types of contributions made with direct link(s) to evidence Also try making a direct edit to improve a current or past book chapter

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:48, 17 August 2024 (UTC)