Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Abusive supervision

Suggestions for 2024 Chapter

Hi there,

I've had a look at the 2023 Chapter for Abusive Supervision and it is dense with text! My suggestion for your chapter to improve on the last is to consider some separation between your main points, include knowledge checks, images, etc. so the reader isn't staring at a wall of text.

Unlike the 2023 chapter, I hope yours can include a definition of Abusive Supervision!

Best of luck! SMurray24 (discuss • contribs) 08:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Initial suggestions

@TJDuus: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

• Check out other related chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work:
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Relationships
  • Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Work
• Also search past book chapters for related topics
• For the topic development, consider:
  • What psychological theory(ies) can help to understand and explain this topic?
  • What is the main research in this area?
• Let me know if I can do anything else to support the development of this chapter.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:50, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Hey James

Was just continuing with fleshing out some of the points on my page, and was wondering about the side effects of Abusive Supervision, both Mental and Physical and was just wondering about some advice for how much detail I should really go into. Mental area covers emotion and motivation, and then I can go further into the two in the physical with hormones etc, and then have a section on Extrinsic and Intrinsic motivation having been affected, do you think that is enough?

Alongside that with the word count (hopefully) having a section on how to prevent the behaviour from possibly occuring.

Is that enough?

Thanks

Tom D TJDuus (discuss • contribs) 04:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

@TJDuus:

I think concentrate on the psychosocial impacts because any physical effects likely flow from those effects unless of course the abuse is physical.

The task is really to synthesise what has been identified in the best psychological science about the causes and impacts of AS. See if you can find any major reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses to help guide decisions about what is notable. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Heading casing

Hi TJDuus. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

I'll get on that now sir, thank you!

Tom D TJDuus (discuss • contribs) 04:02, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Some suggested sources for research on the dark triad.

Hey @TJDuus,

I've have a read through page and I'm super interested in your topic. I saw that you mentioned the dark triad but hadn't yet fleshed out your ideas and was wondering you needed some resources to look into. I did an essay on the dark triad traits in Personality and Individual differences last year and have a bunch of sources and peer reviewed articles you can look into.

Happy researching :)

See below:

Clark, M. A., Lelchook, A. M., & Taylor, M. L. (2010) Beyond the Big Five: How narcissism, perfectionism, and dispositional affect related to workaholism. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(7) 786-791. https://dio.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.013

Furtner, M. R., Rauthmann, K. F., & Sachse, P. (2011) The Self-Loving Self-Leader: An examination of the Relationship Between Self-Leadership and the Dark Triad. Social Behaviour and Personality: an international journal, 39(3) 369-379. https://dio.org/10.2224/sbp.2011.39.3.369

Guerrero-Molina, M., Barbosa-Torres, C., & Moreno-Manso, J. M. (2023) Subclinical psychopathy and styles of intimate relationships. Behavioural Psychology, 31(1) 77-91. https://doi.org/10.51668/bp.8323105n

Kajonius, P. J., Persson, B. N., & Jonason, P. K. (2015) Hedonism, Achievement, and Power: Universal values that characterize the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 173-178. https://dio.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.055

Lindsay, K., Harms, P. D., & Credé, M. (2019) Shall we serve the dark lords? A meta-analytic review of psychopathy and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1), 183-196. https://dio.org/10.1037/apl0000357

O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A Meta-Analysis of the Dark Triad and Work Behaviour: A Social Exchange Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557-579. https://dio.org/10.1037/a0025679

Papageorgiou, K. A., Gianniou, F. M., Wilson, P., Moneta, G. B., Bilello, D., & Clough P., J. (2019) The bright side of the dark: Exploring the positive effect of narcissism on perceived stress through mental toughness. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 116-124. https://dio.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.004

Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002) The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality 36. 556-563.

Sanz-García, A., Gesteira, C., Sanz, J., & García-Vera, M. (2021) Prevalence of Psychopathy in the General Adult Population: A systematic Review and meta-Analysis. Frontiers Psychology 12:661044. https://dio.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661044

Szabó, Z. P., Diller, S. J., Czibor, A., Resás, P., Jonas, E. & Frey, D. (2023). “One of these things is not like the others”: The associations between dark triad personality traits, work attitudes, and work-related motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 205 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112098

Widiger, T. A. (1998) Psychopathy and Normal Personality. In: Cooke, D. J., Forth, A. E., & Hare, R. D. (eds) Psychopathy: Theory, Research and Implications for Society. NATO ASI Series, 88. https://dio.or/10.1007/978-94-011-39656_3

Wu, W., Wang, H., Lee, H. Y., Lin, Y. T., & Guo, F. (2019) How Machiavellianism, Psychopathy, and Narcissism Affect Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Moderating Effect of Psychological Resilience. Frontiers Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00779 U3239762 (discuss • contribs) 12:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic. Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but consider closer alignment 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section A description of the problem/topic is provided. Simplify/abbreviate the description of the problem/topic. Move detail into subsequent sections. Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but consider closer alignment 4. Key points Key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings There seems to be reasonably good coverage of theory, however, strive to balance the content with critical review of relevant research Use APA style 7th edition for citations with three or more authors (i.e., FirstAuthor et al., year) Avoid overcapitalisation (APA style) – more info I recommend using the Studiosity service and/or a service like Grammarly to help improve the quality of written expression such as checking grammatical and spelling errors Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed 5. Figure One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented and captioned The figure caption(s) could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Use APA style to cite figures Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1) 6. Learning feature Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Excellent use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Excellent use of quiz question(s) Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Good Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? Check and correct APA referencing style: remove descriptions of sources capitalisation italicisation doi formatting include hyperlinked dois 8. Resources See also Excellent External links Very good Use sentence casing Use bullet points 9. User page Good Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution One out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence. The other types of contribution are making: direct improvements to other chapters (past or current) comments on the talk pages of other chapters (past or current)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Feedback

Hi @TJDuus,

This was a really interesting read, thank you!

I think there could be some benefit to simplifying your content. For example, I used the hemmingway app on your first scenario, and it had 5 of 7 sentences being very hard or hard to read. You could try rephrasing it like the below:

A possible scenario

A small game company called Maple consists of around 100 workers. Their size aside, they are the industry's epitome of innovation and collaboration.

Reports say the supervisor is "overbearing, a micromanager, and verbally abusive." Workers report they are unsatisfied and unwilling to work, and some show signs of severe stress.

The supervisor has been rude and abusive to a coworker. He reportedly harassed the worker and blamed him for all the division's mistakes. Due to the abuse, he cannot return to work. He fell ill with a serious illness and was admitted to the hospital.

Is this a case of abusive supervision?

Goodluck with the rest of the assignment. :)

Mel U3225022 (discuss • contribs) 09:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Feedback

Hey TJDuus,

I really love how you've tackled this topic. I found myself learning lots about abusive supervision and I love how everything comes back to the psychological foundation of motivation and emotion. I really liked how you broke down the information with the boxes which made reading very clear. I liked how you included real world examples, like the case study of the game company Maple, as this helped me understand the actual consequences of abusive supervision within a workplace setting. The quiz and "What do you think?" sections help to encourage engagement with the material, which I really liked and is something I'd like to try in my page.

Something I think you could improve is by adding a section on potential interventions or strategies for addressing abusive supervision. I think you have covered everything about the cause and impacts of abusive supervision so this section could help to add more to the conclusion. However, it is not essential because I think you have done a great job of summarising your points regardless. Well done! U3236669 (discuss • contribs) 00:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a very good chapter. It makes very good use of psychological theory and some use of research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. Very good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Solid Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon Basic focus questions Use open-ended rather than closed-ended focus questions Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds somewhat on previous, related chapters and/or Wikipedia articles Good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Basic use of tables, figures, and/or lists are to help convey key theoretical information Key citations are reasonably well used Basic use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Reasonably good review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Basic critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Reasonably good integration between theory and research The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research Conclusion Good summary and conclusion Remind the reader about the importance of the problem or phenomenon of interest Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is reasonably good Some paragraphs are overly long. Communicate one key idea per paragraph in three to five sentences. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead: it is, most often, not needed at all, or use section linking Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see tags) See earlier comments about heading casing Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) Consider using a grammar checking tool Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance Spelling Some words are misspelt (e.g., see the tags). Spell-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Proofreading More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard Remove unnecessary capitalisation (e.g., Supervision -> supervision) APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Use serial commas[2]. Video (1 min) Express numbers < 10 using words (e.g., two) and >= 10 and over using numerals (e.g., 99) Figures Figures are well captioned Each Figure (except Figure 1) is referred to at least once within the main text Citations use very good APA style (7th ed.). To improve: If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either: in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020) Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses and "and" outside parentheses References use reasonably good APA style: Remove descriptive information Remove publisher locations Check and correct use of capitalisation[3] Check and correct use of italicisation Learning features Reasonably good use of learning features Basic use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. Reasonably good use of image(s) No use of table(s) Good use of feature box(es) Good use of case studies or examples Good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Use sentence casing Use alphabetical order Move external links to the external links section Basic use of external links in the "External links" section Use sentence casing Use alphabetical order Include sources in parentheses after the link Include a space before the parentheses Social contribution ~12 logged, useful, mostly moderate social contributions with mostly direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:47, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a very good presentation The presentation is over the maximum time limit — content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation Very engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes excellent use of citations to support claims Use APA style for citations The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples The presentation could be improved by providing practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion Provide a conclusion slide which summarises the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical, take-home messages in response to each focus question The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit Audio The audio is easy to follow The presentation makes very good use of narrated audio Audio communication is well paced Very good intonation The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was very good The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is very good The presentation makes very good use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read Some of the slides are text-heavy, making them difficult to read whilst listening The visual communication is supplemented by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation A very good written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. Links to and from the book chapter are provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is clearly indicated

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 20:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)