Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Vicarious embarrassment

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

  1. The title is correctly formatted
  2. The sub-title is incorrectly worded
  3. The title and sub-title are mispelt
  1. The original sub-title offers three clear questions that should be used to help structure the chapter
  2. Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure
  1. Promising plan
  2. Add a scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) at the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  3. Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic
  4. Make this section user-friendly
  5. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended
  1. Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations
  2. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Well underway
  1. Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited
  1. Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc.
  1. Excellent
  2. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
  1. See also
    1. Excellent
  2. External links
    1. Excellent
    2. Use sentence casing
  1. Excellent – used effectively
  2. Excellent description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter
  1. Indirect link(s) to evidence
  2. If adding the second or subsequent link to a page (or a talk/discussion page), create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is an excellent presentation
  1. An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. Very engaging introduction to hook audience interest
  3. A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example
  4. Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented
  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation addresses the topic
  3. An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
  4. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory
  5. The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological research
  6. The presentation makes excellent use of citations to support claims
  7. The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice
  8. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information
  1. A conclusion is presented with excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic take-home message(s)
  1. The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to
  2. The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio
  3. Audio communication is very well paced
  4. Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement
  5. The narration is well practiced and/or performed
  6. Audio recording quality was excellent
  7. Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality. Maybe microphone is slightly too close?
  8. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic
  1. Overall, visual display quality is excellent
  2. The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides
  3. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
  4. The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time
  5. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams
  6. The presentation is very well produced
  7. The visual content is well matched to the target topic
  1. The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. A written description of the presentation is provided
  3. Excellent use of time codes
  4. Links to and from the book chapter are provided
  5. An active hyperlink to the book chapter is provided
  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the presentation description but not in the meta-data

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:54, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Book chapter review and feedback

[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. Excellent use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims
  3. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
  1. Well developed
  2. Engages reader interest via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image
  3. Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon
  4. Clear focus questions
  1. An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained
  2. Builds on one previous, related chapter and/or Wikipedia article
  3. Build more strongly on related chapters and/or Wikipedia articles (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters)
  4. Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies)
  5. Use tables, figures, and/or lists are to help convey key theoretical information
  6. Key citations are well used
  7. Very good use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts
  1. Excellent review of relevant research
  2. Excellent critical thinking about relevant research is evident
  1. Excellent integration between theory and research
  1. Very good summary and conclusion
  2. Key points are well summarised
  3. Add practical, take-home message(s)
  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is very good to excellent
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections
  3. Grammar
    1. The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags)
      1. Consider using a grammar checking tool
      2. Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance
    2. Check and make correct use of commas
    3. Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats')[1]
    4. Abbreviations
      1. Only use abbreviations such as e.g., i.e., et al., etc. inside parentheses, otherwise spell them out
    5. Figures
      1. Figures are very well captioned
    6. Citations use correct APA style
      1. List multiple citations in alphabetical order by first author surname
    7. References use excellent APA style:
      1. Separate page numbers using an en-dash (–) rather than an em-dash (—)
  1. Excellent use of learning features
  2. One use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
  3. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Move links to non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section
  5. Excellent use of image(s)
  6. No use of table(s)
  7. Very good use of feature box(es)
  8. Very good use of case studies or examples
  9. Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
  10. Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
  11. Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section
  1. ~14 logged, useful, minor to moderate social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply