Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Check out the book 'The Body Keeps the Score' by Bessel van der Kolk'. This book represents everything that is groundbreakingly wonderful and and pseudoscientifically horrendous about trauma research
--U3122220 (discuss • contribs) 19:08, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there, this is a great topic and I am looking forward to reading your chapter. I have done some research and I think you can definitely use the below resources for starter references. The initial resource can also help you with the structure of your chapter.
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, it might be interesting to look at specific types of trauma and whether emotional responses differ between these (e.g. childhood trauma, interpersonal trauma, disasters). It could also be worth considering differences between acute, chronic and complex trauma. I hope this is helpful. --U3192645 (discuss • contribs) 03:14, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.
Brief description about self provided – consider expanding
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent
Some paragraphs are overly long. Communicate one key idea per paragraph in three to five sentences.
Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes
Layout
The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections
Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see [Provide more detail] tags)
Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are excellent
The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags)
Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour)
>
Figures
Figures are very well captioned
Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text
Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation)
Citations use correct APA style
Move non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section
References are not in full APA style. For example:
Basic use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Good use of image(s)
No use of table(s)
Very basic use of feature box(es)
Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
No use of case studies or examples
Very good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Basic use of external links in the "External links" section
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
An opening slide with the sub-title is displayed and narrated. Also display and narrate the title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation and to be consistent with the book chapter.
Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest
Establish a context for the presentation (e.g., by using an example or explaining why it is important), to help the viewer understand
Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.
The audio is very slightly cut-off at the beginning
Audio recording quality was good. Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone.
The narrated content is well matched to the target topic (see content)
The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
A very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand.
Excellent use of time codes
Links to and from the book chapter are provided
An active hyperlink to the book chapter is provided
The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This creates limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info.