Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/SSRIs and motivation

Initial suggestions

@Josh.Cattle: Thanks for taking on this topic.

Note that the previous 2022 chapter did not adequately address the topic. You can check out the feedback for that chapter here: Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Antidepressants and motivation#Book chapter review and feedback.

Hope that helps. Let me know know if I can do anything else as you go along.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:16, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Peer suggestion

Hi! This topic looks super interesting and it looks like you're already onto an amazing start. I am very intrigued by the theories you have chosen and the information you have written already is very well informed! The quizzes look like they will be helpful in the user's learning as well as the figures you have chosen. Keep it up! --Lauraei11 (discuss • contribs) 08:27, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Heading casing

Hi Josh.Cattle. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Might interest your topic

This topic is really interesting! I have always been intrigued on how different medications can influence someones behaviour. These articles might interest you and could help you out with your book chapter!

Dopamine/antidepressants

Motivation stimulants U3226707 (discuss • contribs) 22:22, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Potential changes to "see also"

The page has been done well, Josh, and the information is great. Have you thought about potentially adding different links to the "see also" part of the chapter? You have also done a great job with the formatting, but maybe different colours and flair could be the final touch your chapter needs. Good luck on the chapter. --MojoHides (discuss • contribs) 05:30, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted Remove user name – authorship is as per the list of topics and the page's editing history Headings Promising 3-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure - simplify down to a 2-level structure See earlier comment about Heading casing Remove case study as heading; embed case study is most relevant section Reduce weight on general earlier sections (Theories and Neurotransmitters & emotion) & -> and Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Check spelling (e.g., seretonin -> serotonin) Check grammar (e.g., remove question mark unless it is a question) The most promising section is "How do common antidepressants affect motivation?" Avoid excessive emphasis on specific antidepressants - concentrate on the general categories Consider adopting closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings Headings could be more descriptive e.g., "Theories" is a bit pedestrian Overview Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest. No heading. A brief description of the problem/topic is planned Present focus questions in a feature box at the end of this section; express this in 3rd person perspective and use a way to help structure the rest of the chapter (e.g., can be used as the basis for top-level headings) Key points Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. Avoid overcapitalisation (e.g., Negative -> negative) Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research, with practical examples Conclusion (the most important section): Underway Figure Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited Learning feature One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Promising use of quiz question(s) Consider including table(s) etc. References OK Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation italicisation doi formatting page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Resources See also Good Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages External links Very good Use sentence casing User page Very good Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution One out of three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Reasonably good Engages reader interest by introducing a case study and/or scenario with an image in a feature box Briefly explain the problem or question Clear focus questions Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds extremely well on related chapters Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Key citations are well used Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Excellent review of relevant research Excellent critical thinking about relevant research is evident Integration Excellent integration between theory and research Conclusion Excellent summary and conclusion Key points and take-home messages are well summarised Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good to excellent Very well written, but some more proofreading needed Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead: it is, most often, not needed at all, or use section linking The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Excellent APA style for citations Figures are very well captioned Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1) Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses and "and" outside parentheses References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[1] Separate page numbers using an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Learning features Excellent use of learning features Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles Excellent use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Excellent use of image(s) No use of table(s) Excellent use of feature box(es) Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Excellent use of case studies or examples Very good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Also include links to related Wikipedia articles Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section Social contribution ~6 logged, useful, mostly minor social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:35, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a good presentation Overview An opening slide with the sub-title is displayed and narrated. Also display and narrate the title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation and to be consistent with the book chapter. It would be helpful to explain the SSRI abbreviation This presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest The broader scenario context could be helpful (e.g., what % of people using SSRIs report motivational deficits?) A basic context for the presentation is established Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological research The presentation includes citations to support claims Reeves -> Reeve The presentation makes good use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice Conclusion A Conclusion slide is presented with good take-home message(s) Audio The presentation makes good use of narrated audio Audio communication is well paced Reasonably good intonation The narration is reasonably well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was OK. Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic (see content) Video Overall, visual display quality is good/ The presentation makes good use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read Consider using a sans-serif typeface to make the text easier to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in a good way by images Also consider using diagrams The presentation is reasonably well produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic (see content) Meta-data The chapter sub-title but not the chapter title is used in the name of the presentation. The title would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand. Excellent use of time codes Links to and from the book chapter are provided An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to advanced features Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are not provided A copyright license for the presentation is not provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)