Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.
Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
Psychopathy and empathy are seemingly being treated as separate concepts - but are they? Are they part of the same dimension (just opposites)? Consider.
For sections which include sub-sections include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research
Promising use of quiz questions. Remove heading. Move each question to its respective section. Ask questions about the take-home messages for maximum value.
Consider including interwiki links, examples/case studies, table(s) etc.
Description about self provided – consider expanding
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
One contribution has been made and summarised with indirect link(s) to evidence
If adding the second or subsequent link to a page (or a talk/discussion page), create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example.
Excellent use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Minimal use of image(s)
No use of table(s)
No use of feature box(es)
No use of case studies or examples
Basic use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Also include links to related Wikipedia articles
Use alphabetical order
Basic use of external links in the "External links" section
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
The presentation somewhat addresses the topic
Empathy and psychopathy are discussed as separate constructs. But the topic is about their relationship.
There is too much content, in too much detail, presented within the allocated time frame. Zoom out and provide a higher-level presentation at a slower pace. It is best to cover a small amount of well-targetted content than a large amount of poorly selected content.
The presentation makes reasonably good use of relevant psychological theory, but lacks insight into the relationship between empathy and psychopathy.
The presentation makes no explicit use of relevant psychological research
Include citations to support claims
The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/basic use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice
The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies
The narrated content is somewhat well matched to the target topic (see content) but lacked synthesis of the best psychological theory and research about the relationship between empathy and psychopathy
The presentation makes basic use of text-based slides
The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time
The visual communication could be improved by including some relevant images and/or diagrams
The presentation is basically produced using simple tools
The visual content is somewhat matched to the target topic (see content) but lacked synthesis of the best psychological theory and research about the relationship between empathy and psychopathy
The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
Provide an informative description to help viewers decide whether they want to watch
A link to the book chapter is not provided
A link from the book chapter is provided
The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This creates limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info.