Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Emotion across the lifespan

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Topic selection[edit source]

@Taliastefanoski: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

Let me know if I can do anything else as you go along. Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:35, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Peer comments[edit source]

Hi Talia, super interested in your topic of choice! What age group across the lifespan would you say is the most vital in emotional development?--U3229619 (discusscontribs) 12:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Heading casing[edit source]

Hi Taliastefanoski. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:18, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Peer comment[edit source]

Hello, I find this really fascinating, are there any circumstances whereby emotional development may not be restricted within the set time frames for some people i.e., due to trauma reasone etc. ? Sireyes (discusscontribs) 13:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

Title[edit source]

  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted

Headings[edit source]

  1. This structure works
  2. Probably ageing should also be added
  3. Perhaps consider using a table to summarise notable dimensions of emotion across these developmental stages (e.g., as part of the Conclusion) (

optional)

Overview[edit source]

  1. Useful ideas
  2. Add a scenario in a feature box at the start to help catch reader interest
  3. Add a brief, evocative description of the problem/topic
  4. Consider adding an image to the scenario or case study to help catch reader interest

Key points[edit source]

  1. The first half or 2/3rds has reasonably good development of key points with relevant citations
  2. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research
  3. Conclusion (the most important section):## Hasn't been developed
    1. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  4. Use Australian spelling (e.g., ize -> ise)

Figure[edit source]

  1. A relevant figure is presented
  2. Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text
  3. Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text - Figure should be capitalised

Learning feature[edit source]

  1. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Focus the quiz question(s) on the take-home messages for each focus question
  3. Consider including more examples/case studies, table(s) etc.

References[edit source]

  1. OK but messy
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. capitalisation
    2. italicisation
    3. include dois
    4. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)

Resources[edit source]

  1. See also
    1. Very good
    2. I've tweaked the formatting
  2. External links
    1. Very good
    2. Use sentence casing

User page[edit source]

  1. Excellent – used effectively
  2. Excellent description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:20, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Book chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a good to very good chapter. It makes very good use of psychological theory and basic use of research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. Well under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand
  3. For additional feedback, see the following comments and https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2023%2FEmotion_across_the_lifespan&diff=2578168&oldid=2574577 these copyedits]

Overview[edit source]

  1. Well developed
  2. Engages reader interest by introducing a case study and/or scenario with an image in a feature box
  3. Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon
  4. The focus questions are all very similar; suggest developing more distinct questions

Theory[edit source]

  1. A very good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained
  2. Builds somewhat on previous, related chapters
  3. Good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies)
  4. No use of tables, figures, and/or lists are to help clearly convey key theoretical information
  5. Lack of sufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
  6. Reasonably good use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts

Research[edit source]

  1. Basic review of relevant research
  2. More detail about key studies would be ideal
  3. Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Greater emphasis on effect sizes could be helpful.
  4. Lack of sufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
  5. Insufficient critical thinking about relevant research is evident
  6. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by:
    1. describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies
    2. discussing the direction of relationships
    3. considering the strength of relationships
    4. acknowledging limitations
    5. pointing out critiques/counterarguments
    6. suggesting specific directions for future research
  7. Many claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)

Integration[edit source]

  1. Basic integration between theory and research
  2. The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. Excellent summary and conclusion
  2. Key points are well summarised
  3. Summarise key points
  4. Clear take-home message(s)
  5. Useful figure; Convert it into an editable table and present much earlier

Style[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is very good
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter structure needs work e.g., remove single sub-sections
  3. Grammar
    1. The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags)
      1. Consider using a grammar checking tool
      2. Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance
  4. APA style
    1. Write numbers under 10 using words (e.g., five). Express numbers 10 and over using numerals (e.g., 10).
    2. Use serial commas[1] – they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. See explanatory video (1 min)

>

    1. Figures
      1. Figures are well captioned
      2. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text
    2. Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example:
      1. Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses and "and" outside parentheses
    3. References use almost correct APA style - check for consistency

Learning features[edit source]

  1. Good use of learning features
  2. Basic use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
  3. Basic use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Basic use of image(s)
  5. Basic use of table(s)
  6. Very good use of feature box(es)
  7. Promising use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
  8. Very good use of case studies or examples
  9. Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
  10. Very good use of external links in the "External links" section
    1. Use sentence casing

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~4 logged, useful, minor social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:37, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a very good presentation

Overview[edit source]

  1. An opening slide with the title is displayed. Also display and narrate the sub-title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. This presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest
  3. A basic context for the presentation is established
  4. The focus questions are very similar

Content[edit source]

  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation addresses the topic
  3. An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
  4. The presentation is well structured
  5. The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological theory
  6. The presentation makes no explicit use of relevant psychological research. Ideally, make more explicit use of research.
  7. The presentation includes citations to support claims
  8. The presentation makes very good use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice
  9. The presentation provides easy to understand information

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. A Conclusion slide is presented with excellent take-home message(s)

Audio[edit source]

  1. The audio is easy to follow
  2. The presentation makes very good use of narrated audio
  3. Audio communication is well paced
  4. Reasonably good intonation
  5. The narration is well practiced and/or performed
  6. Audio recording quality was good
  7. There is some buffeting. Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality. The microphone may be too close.
  8. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic (see content)

Video[edit source]

  1. Overall, visual display quality is very good
  2. The presentation makes good use of text and image based slides
  3. Some of the font size could be larger to make it easier to read
  4. The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time
  5. Check and correct spelling (e.g., Experince -> Experience)
  6. The visual communication is supplemented in a good way by images and/or diagrams
  7. The presentation is well produced using simple tools
  8. The visual content is well matched to the target topic (see content)

Meta-data[edit source]

  1. The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
  3. Links to and from the book chapter are provided

Licensing[edit source]

  1. Image sources are communicated in a general way. Also provide links to each image and the license details (e.g., in the description).
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply