Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Effective leadership

Who are the most iconic emotionally agile leaders?

Perhaps some of them could be used for a case study? ---- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:19, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

I have heard mixed things about Steve Jobs. What do you reckon? -- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:21, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks James, this is an excellent suggestion. I did not think of the who e.g. Steve Jobs U103189 (discuss • contribs) 04:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Bottom-line mentality

U103189: This may be of interest:

Greenbaum, R. L., Mawritz, M. B., & Zaman, N. N. (2023). The construct of bottom-line mentality: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Journal of Management, 49(6), 2109-2147. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/01492063231153135

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks a million James, I will have a read :) U103189 (discuss • contribs) 05:56, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted Headings 2-level heading structure; reasonably well aligned with the sub-title and focus questions I would dispense with "Definitions" as a heading (it is a bit pedestrian); instead just embed definitions where/as needed with links to further info. Having said that, a clear definition of effective leadership will be vital Remove abbreviations from headings Consider dropping "Relevant theories" as a heading and moving up relevant theories to top-level headings "Who are the most iconic emotionally agile leaders?" - I would remove this heading; but consider whether it is useful to use any of these people as possible case studies if they illustrate key points Consider possible further development of sub-headings Overview A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Move the scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) to the start of this section to help catch reader interest. Consider abbreviating the case study and/or moving detail into a follow-up case study box in subsequent section(s) Suggest just using one image in the Overview; consider whether other images may be best placed I think drop "Who are the most iconic effective leaders?" as a focus question; see comment re this in previous section Key points Promising development of key points for each section Direct quotes need page numbers (APA style) – even better, write in your own words Distinguish between effective leadership and emotionally intelligence leadership. It might help to move the core behaviours above the theories. Provide more citatations; make sure to identify the best available psychological science (theory and research) about this topic Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research Conclusion (the most important section): Underway Figure Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text Learning feature Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Consider including quiz question(s), table(s) etc. References OK; zero in on the best available psychological theory and research about this topic Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? For APA referencing style, check and correct: doi formatting page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Resources See also Excellent External links Excellent User page Created – minimal, but sufficient Brief description about self provided – consider expanding Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:23, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a very good chapter. It makes very good use of psychological theory and some use of research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Engages reader interest by introducing a case study and/or scenario with an image in a feature box Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon Clear focus questions Theory Very good to excellent content; organisation is well chunked, but it is not so clear how the chunks weave together Expand the description of effective leadership; this is a fuzzy concept, so more consideration needed before diving into specifics Clearer conceptual distinction between EI, behaviours, skills, and traits would be ideal; it seems likely there is a consider overlap here Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding more links to other chapters) Good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Effective use of tables and/or lists are to help clearly convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used Very good / promising use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Ideally, the case study could more about how Sarah or Jacinda etc. developed effective leadership skills Research Reasonably good review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Greater emphasis on effect sizes could be helpful. Some critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Claims are referenced Integration Reasonably good integration between theory and research The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research Conclusion Excellent summary and conclusion Key points are well summarised Clear take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good to excellent Avoid one sentence paragraphs. Convey one idea per paragraph using three to five sentences. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes "People" is sometimes a better term than "individuals" Use serial commas[2] – they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. See explanatory video (1 min) Use abbreviations sparingly. Do not use abbreviations for minor terms that aren't used very much in the chapter. Figures Figures are well captioned Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text Tables Table captions use close to APA style Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example: If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either: in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020) References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[3] Check and correct use of italicisation Learning features Excellent use of learning features Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles One use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Very good use of image(s) Excellent use of table(s) Excellent use of feature box(es) Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Good use of case studies or examples Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section Include sources in parentheses Social contribution ~11 logged, useful, minor to moderate social contributions, including contributions to Wikimedia Commons, with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:26, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a reasonably good presentation Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed. Also narrate the title and sub-title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the topic is established Focus questions are presented on a slide, but too quickly to be read easily - consider narrating Perhaps the 4 focus questions could be simplified/reduced for the presentation? Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes no explicit use of relevant psychological research Include citations to support claims The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies Conclusion A Conclusion slide is presented with take-home message(s) Audio The audio is easy to follow The presentation makes good use of narrated audio Audio communication is well paced Audio recording quality was very good Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone. The narrated content is reasonably well matched to the target topic (see content) (but should also include the best research on this topic) Video Overall, visual display quality is very good The presentation makes effective/good/basic use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is reasonably well matched to the target topic (see content) (but should also include the best research on this topic) Meta-data The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A written description of the presentation is provided Links to and from the book chapter are provided An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to advanced features More info]. Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)