Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Window of tolerance

Social Contribution - Two suggestions / ideas

Hi, I know this is really early on in the piece, i.e., this is far from your end version.

1. Thought I'd flag that your 4th main heading 'Case Study' should maybe read as 'Case study' as per heading casing.
2. I realise your focus is probably around trauma (both as the instigator and subsequent treatment thereof). But...just thought I'd mention that there's some interesting theory / research / treatment around the relationship: window of tolerance - affective experience dysregulatiion = addiction. Something around Affect Regulation Training (ART) on Alcohol Use Disorder could make for an (additional) interesting case study or may be used as an example in your psychotherapeutic practices component? See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3773302/ and https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306460320307826.

U943292 (discuss • contribs) 02:40, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted User page Excellent – used effectively Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution Excellent – at least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence Headings Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic It is likely that this may run over the word, so be prepared to make decisions about what to leave out - the key will be to ask "does this help to address the sub-title question?". Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations Overview is well developed Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research I can understanding the "normal" focus for the window of tolerance (in this sense, akin to optimal arousal theory), but I thought the WOT concept was more trauma-specific? If so, this should probably be explained and more clearly emphasised. Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Consider including more examples/case studies Conclusion is well developed. Figure Excellent – A relevant figure is presented and it is appropriately captioned The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text References Good Concentrate on peer-reviewed sources Only need one of the Seigel (2020) references For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation italicisation doi formatting Resources See also Excellent External links Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent presentation Overview An opening slide with the title is displayed. Also display and narrate the sub-title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. This presentation has a very engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the topic is clearly established through an example Focus questions are presented Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation is well structured (i.e., Overview, Content, Conclusion) The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes very good use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information Conclusion A Conclusion slide is presented with excellent take-home message(s) Audio The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to Audio communication is clear and well paced Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point. Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement The narration is well polished Audio recording quality was excellent Video Overall, visual display quality is excellent The presentation makes effective use of animated slides The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams The presentation is very well produced Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. Links to and from the book chapter are provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:19, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Overview Explains the problem or phenomenon Engages reader interest by introducing a case study and/or example and/or using an image Reasonably clear focus question(s) Theory – Breadth An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Build more strongly on other trauma- and/or arousal-related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters in this category: Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Trauma) Theory – Depth Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Key citations are well used Research – Key findings Basic review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Research – Critical thinking Excellent critical thinking about relevant research is evident Claims are referenced) Integration Very good integration between theory and research Conclusion Excellent summary and conclusion Clear take-home message(s) Written expression – Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent "People" is often a better term than "individuals" Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are excellent Use serial commas[1] – they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. See explanatory video (1 min) Figures Figures are very well captioned Use this format for figure captions: Figure X. Descriptive caption in sentence casing. See example Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text Citations use correct APA style References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Written expression – Learning features Excellent use of learning features Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles One use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Very good use of image(s) No use of table(s) Very good use of feature box(es) Excellent use of quiz(zes) Excellent use of case studies or examples Good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Good use of external links in the "External links" section Social contribution ~5 logged, useful, moderate to major social contributions with direct links to evidence 2nd link was the same as the first? +3 images were created and uploaded. Thankyou! The model is particularly impressive.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:16, 18 November 2022 (UTC)