Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Video conferencing fatigue

Feedback

Hey, this chapter looks really good so far, really like what you did with the key points part! Really looking forward to reading it when it's finished. U3191488 (discuss • contribs) 13:27, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi @U3191488 - Thanks for taking time and reading my book chapter .The book chapter is now all set for submission . If you get time ,please have a look and let me know your feedback.

regards

@U3211603

U3211603 (discuss • contribs) 11:12, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted User page Excellent – used effectively Description about self provided Link(s) provided to professional profile(s) Link provided to book chapter Social contribution Excellent – at least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence Headings Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic Consider rewording the top-level headings to questions, as per the sub-title Consider simplifying repetitive sub-heading wording Consider using the ZEF scale as a feature box rather than a major section; try to keep the top-level headings directly on tackling the sub-title questions So, overall, I think the heading structure is good but can be simplified, refined, and focused Key points Key points are well developed for each section Include more citations for key points for the book chapter Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Write the chapter using 3rd person perspective, although a case study or feature box could use 1st or 2nd person perspective Overview and Conclusion (the most important sections) are well developed Figure Excellent – A relevant figure is presented and it is appropriately captioned and cited References Very good For APA referencing style, check and correct: italicisation Resources See also Excellent External links Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a solid chapter that makes good use of psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits. Overview Solid Overview. Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon. Provide interwiki links to Wikipedia articles rather than external links. Consider introducing a case study or example to help engage reader interest. Clear focus question(s). Theory – Breadth Sufficient coverage of relevant theory is provided. Consider expanding the focus on the psychological causes of this type of fatigue. What is it about the VC environment that can make it more fatiguing (e.g., constantly scanning faces[1]). Builds somewhat on previous, related chapters (e.g., burnout), but this could be expanded. Theory – Depth Reasonable depth is provided about the selected theory(ies). Tables and/or lists are used effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information. Basic use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts. Research – Key findings Reasonably good review of relevant research. Review of research literature about individual differences was useful. What sort of effect sizes have been found? How long does the fatigue last? etc. Research – Critical thinking Basic critical thinking about research is evident. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Some claims are referenced. Some claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the tags). Integration Discussion of theory and research is reasonably well integrated. Conclusion Key points are well summarised. Clear take-home message(s). Written expression – Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good. Direct quotes should be embedded within sentences and paragraphs, rather than dumped holus-bolus. Even better, communicate the concept in your own words. Abbreviations Once an abbreviation is established (e.g., VC), use it consistently. Don't set up an abbreviation and then not use it or only use it sometimes. Check and correct grammatical formatting for abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e., et al., etc.). Spelling Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour). Proofreading More proofreading is needed to fix typos and bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard Remove unnecessary capitalisation (e.g., "(Computers, Smart phones , Tablets etc)") Remove double-spaces APA style Do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc.. Figures Figures are very well captioned Figure 3 is difficult to read (small font); consider increasing size Figure captions use the correct format. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example: Remove commas: "Taber et al., (2021) examined behaviour ..." References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Check and correct use of italicisation Move non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section Written expression – Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is very good. Good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. One use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Links to non-peer-reviewed sources should be moved to the external links section. Excellent use of image(s). No use of table(s). Excellent use of feature box(es). Good use of quiz(zes). The quiz questions could be more effective as learning prompts by being embedded as single questions within each corresponding section rather than being presented as a set of questions at the end. Good use of case studies or examples. Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section. Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section. Social contribution Use numbered lists ~14 logged, useful, minor to major social contributions with direct links to evidence. ~17 Wikimedia Commons image uploads. Thanks very much for your extensive contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent presentation Overview Display and narrate a slide with the same title and sub-title as the book chapter to help the viewer understand the purpose of the presentation This presentation has a very engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the topic is clearly established through an example Focus questions are presented Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation is well structured (i.e., Overview, Content, Conclusion) The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological research Include citations to support claims The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information Conclusion A Conclusion slide is presented with excellent take-home message(s) Audio The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to Audio communication is clear and well paced Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point. Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement The narration is well polished Audio recording quality was excellent Video Overall, visual display quality is excellent The presentation makes effective use of animated slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams The presentation is very well produced using PowToon Meta-data The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A written description of the presentation is provided Links to and from the book chapter are provided The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This introduces limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info. Licensing Many of the images are probably from PowToon but this is not explicitly stated. And other images have been imported without acknowledgement and may have violated copyright. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:58, 10 November 2022 (UTC)