Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Emotional development in adolescence

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Heading casing[edit source]

Hi U3230861. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:26, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Chapter directions[edit source]

Hi u3230861,

It may be interesting/beneficial to look at what happens when emotional development in adolescence does not occur as expected. For example, adolescents with autism often have trouble recognizing their own emotions, as well as others' emotions. Facial expressions in particular can be hard to interpret. These references may be useful in getting you started, should you choose to go down this path:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0890856713003080

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006322309011226?casa_token=0_C8ecgst5EAAAAA:y1j45alLji48CMQICWWIdOAQQfl0baxaP3jvZ6o4BwJkPmjGVSBDfrDGVWunS6QZb1RXi-oR U3203545 (discusscontribs) 10:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback[edit source]

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title[edit source]

  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted

User page[edit source]

  1. Created – minimal, but sufficient
  2. Brief description about self provided – consider expanding
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. At least one contribution has been made with direct link(s) to evidence
  2. I don't recommend changing someone else's comment. Either reply and add your own comment or make a change to the page itself.
  3. Summarise the contribution on your user page.
  4. Use a numbered list

Headings[edit source]

  1. Basic, 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development
  2. Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings

Key points[edit source]

  1. Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
  2. Overview - Consider adding:
    1. an evocative description of the problem and what will be covered
    2. focus questions
    3. an image
    4. an example or case study
  3. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research
  4. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters.
  5. Consider including examples/case studies
  6. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Hasn't been developed

Figure[edit source]

  1. A relevant figure is presented and minimally captioned
  2. Cite each figure at least once in the main text

References[edit source]

  1. Very good
  2. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. capitalisation
    2. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)

Resources[edit source]

  1. See also
    1. Appropriate
    2. Rename links so that they are more user friendly
    3. Include source in brackets after link
    4. Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages
    5. Not developed
  2. External links
    1. Appropriate
    2. Rename links so that they are more user friendly
    3. Include source in brackets after link

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:55, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Related previous book chapter[edit source]

Hey there !

I have come across a previous book chapter that discussed emotion regulation and ageing with a small section on adolescence which may be beneficial for you to read over ! You may be able to link it somewhere too!

Motivation and emotion/Book/2020/Emotion regulation and ageing

I have also come across a source that might be of interest to you as it focuses on sleep hygiene in adolescence and how this may be a contributor to emotion Dysregulation. This source found a strong correlation between a lack of sleep hygiene and higher levels of emotion Dysregulation!

https://academic.oup.com/jpepsy/article/47/1/111/6355344

Good Luck :) U3210431 (discusscontribs) 23:26, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thankyou U3210431, I will definitely have a read over those!! U3230861 (discusscontribs) 03:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Book chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a solid, well presented chapter that makes good use of psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. Well over the maximum word count. Some references and external links ignored for marking purposes.
  3. For additional feedback, see the following comments and [ these copyedits].

Overview[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a well developed Overview.
  2. Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon.
  3. Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest.
  4. Consider adding focus questions in a feature box to help guide the reader and structure the chapter.

Theory – Breadth[edit source]

  1. Relevant theory is reasonably well explained.
  2. Arguably too broad (e.g., the indepth look at ASD wasn't necessary to address the topic, but could be a useful feature/case study).
  3. Build more strongly on other adolescence-related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters in this category: Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Adolescence).

Theory – Depth[edit source]

  1. Appropriate depth is provided about the selected theory(ies).
  2. As well as the advantages of social media for adolescent emotional development, are there cons?
  3. Key citations are well used.
  4. Tables and/or lists are used effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information.
  5. Some useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts.
  6. The Reeve (2018) textbook is overused as a citation – instead, utilise primary, peer-reviewed sources.

Research – Key findings[edit source]

  1. Reasonably good review of relevant research.
  2. Greater emphasis on major reviews and key effect sizes, from meta-analyses would be helpful.

Research – Critical thinking[edit source]

  1. Basic critical thinking about research is evident.
  2. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by:
    1. describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies
    2. discussing the direction of relationships
    3. considering the strength of relationships
    4. acknowledging limitations
    5. pointing out critiques/counterarguments
  3. Claims are mostly referenced.

Integration[edit source]

  1. Discussion of theory and research is well integrated.

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. Key points are well summarised.
  2. Clear take-home message(s).

Written expression – Style[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is good.
    2. Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead:
      1. it is, most often, not needed at all, or
      2. use section linking.
    3. Use permanent, rather than relative, time references. For example, instead of "20 years ago", refer to something like "at the beginning of the 21st century". In this way, the text will survive better into the future, without needing to be rewritten.
  2. Grammar
    1. Check and correct use of possessive apostrophes (e.g., cats vs cat's vs cats').

[1].

    1. Figures
      1. Figures are well used.
      2. Number figures sequentially.
      3. Provide more detailed Figure captions to help connect the figure to the text.
      4. Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1).
      5. Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation).
    2. Citations use very good APA style.
    3. References use very good APA style.
      1. Check and correct use of capitalisation[2]
      2. Provide full journal titles
      3. Page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)

Written expression – Learning features[edit source]

  1. Overall, the use of learning features is excellent.
  2. Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example.
  3. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Very good use of image(s).
  5. No use of table(s).
  6. Excellent use of feature box(es).
  7. Excellent use of quiz(zes).
  8. Very good use of case studies or examples.
  9. Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section.
  10. Poorly formatted use of external links in the "External links" section.

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~5 logged, useful,moderate to major social contributions with direct links to evidence.
  2. ~1 logged social contributions without direct links to evidence, so unable to easily verify and assess.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an very good presentation

Overview[edit source]

  1. An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Also narrate the title and sub-title.
  2. This presentation has an engaging introduction to hook audience interest
  3. A context for the topic is established
  4. Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.

Content[edit source]

  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation addresses the topic
  3. An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
  4. The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory
  5. The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological
  6. The presentation is well structured
  7. The presentation includes citations
  8. The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. Audio conclusion is provided
  2. The presentation could be strengthened by expanding on the take-home message (e.g., answers to more than one focus question)

Audio[edit source]

  1. The audio is easy to follow
  2. Audio communication is clear and well paced
  3. Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement
  4. The narration is well polished
  5. Audio recording quality was excellent

Video[edit source]

  1. Overall, visual display quality is very good
  2. The presentation makes good use of text and image based slides
  3. Ideally, move from slide to slide, without returning to the title slide
  4. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
  5. Sometimes, the amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time
  6. Sometimes, the amount of text presented per slide should be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time
  7. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams. However, at least one of the diagrams is too small to read
  8. The presentation is well produced using simple tools

Meta-data[edit source]

  1. The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. A written description of the presentation is provided
  3. Links to and from the book chapter are provided

Licensing[edit source]

  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:57, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply