Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.
Very brief description about self provided – consider expanding
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
Basic, 1-level heading structure – would benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure
It is unclear how the first couple of sections (physiological and psychological) relate to behavioural economics; consider using more specific theory/ies
Overall, this content is too general and doesn't sufficiently address the question in the sub-title.
I suggest identifying, say, 3 key motivational theories or aspects of motivational theories, which are cornerstones of BE, and concentrating the chapter on explaining the theory, research, and with practical examples.
Overview
Currently, this is too dense and insufficiently related to the topic.
Consider replacing with:
a short, evocative description of the problem and what will be covered
focus questions
an image
an example or case study
Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research
Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Hi there, your book chapter has come along nicely great work! I especially found the cognitive reflection test quite interesting to engage with. It was challenging and really demonstrates the intuitive response. ie 5 minutes, 5 machines, 5 widgets to 100 machines, 100 minutes, 100 widgets (which is wrong of course). It looks like you have nearly finished however maybe consider adding a case study? I find it helps people create a more personal connection to the material instead of just reading information. Many thanks and all the best for the rest of your book chapter! AEMOR (discuss • contribs) 23:36, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hey! Fantastic job so far, it looks like your page is really coming together :) only tip so far is maybe consider resizing figure 2 so that it fits a bit better with the rest of the page. --U3190773 (discuss • contribs) 03:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, I re-numbered a bunch of my figures before I saw this so I'm not 100% sure which one you meant, but I think you meant the taxonomy of motivation one and I have made it a bit smaller. Thanks for the suggestion! U3141987 (discuss • contribs) 09:44, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an excellent, rich, and interesting chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
Overall, the use of learning features is excellent
Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example.
One use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Excellent use of image(s)
No use of table(s)
Excellent use of feature box(es)
Excellent use of quiz(zes)
Excellent use of case studies or examples
Good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Good use of external links in the "External links" section
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to
The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio
Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement
The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
A written description of the presentation is provided
A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
A written description of the presentation is not provided. Providing an informative description can help viewers decide whether they want to watch or not.