Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Behavioural economics and motivation

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Topic development feedback[edit source]

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title[edit source]

  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted

User page[edit source]

  1. Created – minimal, but sufficient
  2. Very brief description about self provided – consider expanding
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Excellent – at least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence

Headings[edit source]

  1. Basic, 1-level heading structure – would benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure
  2. It is unclear how the first couple of sections (physiological and psychological) relate to behavioural economics; consider using more specific theory/ies

Key points[edit source]

  1. Overall, this content is too general and doesn't sufficiently address the question in the sub-title.
  2. I suggest identifying, say, 3 key motivational theories or aspects of motivational theories, which are cornerstones of BE, and concentrating the chapter on explaining the theory, research, and with practical examples.
  3. Overview
    1. Currently, this is too dense and insufficiently related to the topic.
    2. Consider replacing with:
    3. a short, evocative description of the problem and what will be covered
    4. focus questions
    5. an image
    6. an example or case study
  4. Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
  5. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research
  6. Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  7. Consider including more examples/case studies
  8. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Hasn't been developed

Figure[edit source]

  1. Excellent – A relevant figure is presented and it is appropriately captioned
  2. Ideally, explain how this relates to BE
  3. Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text

References[edit source]

  1. Excellent

Resources[edit source]

  1. Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:48, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Feedback[edit source]

Hi there, your book chapter has come along nicely great work! I especially found the cognitive reflection test quite interesting to engage with. It was challenging and really demonstrates the intuitive response. ie 5 minutes, 5 machines, 5 widgets to 100 machines, 100 minutes, 100 widgets (which is wrong of course). It looks like you have nearly finished however maybe consider adding a case study? I find it helps people create a more personal connection to the material instead of just reading information. Many thanks and all the best for the rest of your book chapter! AEMOR (discusscontribs) 23:36, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! I've done that in my next section, and I appreciate the suggestion. U3141987 (discusscontribs) 09:42, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hey! Fantastic job so far, it looks like your page is really coming together :) only tip so far is maybe consider resizing figure 2 so that it fits a bit better with the rest of the page. --U3190773 (discusscontribs) 03:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I re-numbered a bunch of my figures before I saw this so I'm not 100% sure which one you meant, but I think you meant the taxonomy of motivation one and I have made it a bit smaller. Thanks for the suggestion! U3141987 (discusscontribs) 09:44, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Book chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent, rich, and interesting chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem
  2. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits

Overview[edit source]

  1. Well developed Overview
  2. Explains the problem or phenomenon
  3. Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest
  4. Clear focus question(s)
  5. The focus questions could be improved by being more specific to the topic (i.e., the sub-title)

Theory – Breadth[edit source]

  1. Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained
  2. Could build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters)

Theory – Depth[edit source]

  1. A rich, integrative understanding of relevant theory is demonstrated
  2. Appropriate depth is provided about the selected theory(ies)
  3. Key citations are well used
  4. Tables and/or lists are used effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information
  5. Useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts

Research – Key findings[edit source]

  1. Relevant research is well reviewed

Research – Critical thinking[edit source]

  1. Excellent critical thinking about research is evident
  2. Claims are referenced

Integration[edit source]

  1. Discussion of theory and research is well integrated

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. Key points are well summarised
  2. Clear take-home message(s)

Written expression – Style[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections
  3. Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are excellent
    1. Figures
      1. Figures are very well captioned
      2. Figure captions use the correct format
      3. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text using APA style

Written expression – Learning features[edit source]

  1. Overall, the use of learning features is excellent
  2. Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example.
  3. One use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Excellent use of image(s)
  5. No use of table(s)
  6. Excellent use of feature box(es)
  7. Excellent use of quiz(zes)
  8. Excellent use of case studies or examples
  9. Good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
  10. Good use of external links in the "External links" section

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~20 logged, useful, minor to very significant, genuine social contributions with direct links to evidence
  2. +2 high quality images were developed and uploaded
  3. Thanks very much for your extensive contributions

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:47, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent presentation

Overview[edit source]

  1. A title slide displays the title but not the sub-title. Also narrate the title and sub-title. Ideally the title slide would occur earlier.
  2. This presentation has a very engaging introduction to hook audience interest
  3. A context for the topic is clearly established through an example
  4. Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.

Content[edit source]

  1. The content is a tour de force - congratulations. A lot of relevant material is covered in an entertaining, understandable way.
  2. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  3. The presentation successfully addresses the topic
  4. The presentation is well structured (i.e., Overview, Content, Conclusion)
  5. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory
  6. The presentation makes implied use of relevant psychological research
  7. The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. A Conclusion slide is presented with excellent take-home message(s)

Audio[edit source]

  1. The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to
  2. The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio
  3. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
  4. Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement
  5. The narration is well polished
  6. Audio recording quality was excellent

Video[edit source]

  1. Overall, visual display quality is excellent
  2. The presentation makes effective use of video/animation
  3. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
  4. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams
  5. The presentation is exceptionally well produced

Meta-data[edit source]

  1. The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. A written description of the presentation is provided
  3. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
  4. A written description of the presentation is not provided. Providing an informative description can help viewers decide whether they want to watch or not.
  5. Excellent use of time codes
  6. Links to and from the book chapter are provided

Licensing[edit source]

  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:35, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply