Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Animal emotion

Recommendation of a limitations section

Hey there, in your overview you mention that the study of emotions in non mammals is limited. It may be worthwhile to have this as a separate header/sub header and explore why this may be the case. U3196624 (discuss • contribs) 17:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

References

Hi, It looks like you are underway! Just make sure that your references and any other table, graph, or images that you may choose to add in later are in APA 7 formatting. If you are stuck, the UC Library guide is a great place to start. U3216256 (discuss • contribs) 04:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The subtitle is missing User page Excellent – used effectively Brief description about self provided – consider expanding Link provided to Twitter - maybe also professional profile(s)? Link provided to book chapter Social contribution None summarised with direct link(s) to evidence – looking ahead to the book chapter submission see how to earn marks for social contribution Headings Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development by expanding the structure Consider starting with the evolution and emotion section, then moving to emotion in some specific types of animals Consider rephrasing some of the headings as questions (which could also be focus questions introduced in the Overview) Key points Basic development of key points for each section, with relevant citations Overview - Consider adding: an evocative description of the problem and what will be covered focus questions an image an example or case study Strive for an integrated balance of theory, research, and application/example Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Include more in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters. Promising use of examples/case studies (e.g., specific emotions in specific animals/types of animals) Perhaps also consider, what are the implications of animal emotion for human emotion? Conclusion (the most important section): Hasn't been developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? In a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions? Figure Excellent – A relevant figure is presented and it is briefly captioned - what emotions are depicted? Cite each figure at least once in the main text References There seems to be a mixture of APA style references in References and wiki style references in External links; use one style or the other For APA referencing style, check and correct: italicisation doi formatting page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) no bold etc. Resources See also OK Include source in brackets after link Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages Move external link to External links (or into References if it is a peer-reviewed article) External links Excellent None provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:51, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Source and suggestion

Hi there ! I am absolutely intrigued by your topic and found an interesting source that you might find beneficial ! This study looked at self-reports from a large sample of dog and cat owners and were asked questions about their pet's ability to display basic emotions and complex emotions and to what extent their pets mirrored these emotions. The results showed that the higher the attachment between owner and dog, the dog was more likely to display and understand all of these emotions. Cats on the other hand were only able to display, joy, sadness, disappointment, compassion, surprise and shame. I hope this helps you :)

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08927936.2015.1075299 U3210431 (discuss • contribs) 22:36, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Recommended research

What an awesome topic! Research in this area would be really fascinating to conduct! I found two different studies which may be helpful your chapter. The first is an article about how elephants can count food using their sense of smell. While this may seem unrelated to your topic, it highlights a challenge in research on animal cognition and emotion because perception of the world can vary substantially based on primary sensory systems being different between species. Plotnik. (2019). Elephants have a nose for quantity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America., 116(25), 12566–12571. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818284116

Elephants are cool so here is another article on how they experience death. They seem to have a general awareness of death and show compassion. Douglas-Hamilton. (2006). Behavioural reactions of elephants towards a dying and deceased matriarch. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 100(1-2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.014

I've also heard that elephants, and crows? sometimes conduct funerals? I have no idea if this is true or not? Perhaps you could address some common urban legends such as these and find what research there is to support/refute these claims. Noah O'Brien (discuss • contribs) 08:40, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Hi, the topic is really interesting, just be careful that using APA 7th formatting as your reference. I also give some suggestion in your chapter, feel free to check it out. Here are some reference that might be useful for your topic.

Sanders, C. R. (2003). Actions Speak Louder than Words: Close Relationships between Humans and Nonhuman Animals. Symbolic Interaction, 26(3), 405–426. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.3.405

Myers, O. E., Saunders, C. D., & Birjulin, A. A. (2004). Emotional Dimensions of Watching Zoo Animals: An Experience Sampling Study Building on Insights from Psychology. Curator: The Museum Journal, 47(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00127.x

‌

‌

Jingru shao 0906 (discuss • contribs) 17:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Possible Suggestion

Really good stuff! You may of already considered this but a possible future consideration and addition is Crows and other members of the Corvid family. Some examples for this are how some such as the Clark's Nutcracker is able to store large amounts of food and use spatial memory to recall where it stored them. Another example is how adaptive crows can be and how they've learnt to use human made objects as tools eg using lit ciggerates to get rid of parasites in their wings.

[1]https://www.nature.com/articles/484453a BenjiD'Ange (discuss • contribs) 08:45, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem The sub-title has been corrected to match the index of topics For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Solid Overview Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest Clear focus question(s) Theory – Breadth Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters) Theory – Depth Insightful depth is provided about the selected theory(ies) Tables and/or lists could be used more effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information Some useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts Research – Key findings Reasonably good review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Research – Critical thinking Very good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Claims are referenced Integration Discussion of theory and research is well integrated Conclusion Key points are well summarised Clear take-home message(s) Summarise answers to focus questions Written expression – Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead: Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are excellent Figures Figures are very well captioned Provide more detailed Figure captions to help connect the figure to the text Figure captions use the correct format Figure captions should use this format: Figure X. Descriptive caption in sentence casing. See example Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1) Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation) Tables Table captions use APA style Refer to each Table at least once within the main text (e.g., see Table 1) Written expression – Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is good Basic use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Basic use of image(s) No use of table(s) Good use of feature box(es) Excellent use of quiz(zes) Very good use of case studies or examples Excellent/Very good/Good/Basic/No use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Include sources in parentheses Basic use of see also links (include source in parentheses) No use of external links in the "External links" section Social contribution ~13 logged, useful, mostly minor social contributions towards the end of semester with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:03, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a very good presentation The presentation is over the maximum time limit — content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes Overview Display and narrate a slide with the same title and sub-title as the book chapter to help the viewer understand the purpose of the presentation This presentation has a very engaging introduction to hook audience interest A context for the topic is clearly established through an example Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic There is too much content (over max time) The presentation is well structured (i.e., Overview, Content, Conclusion) The presentation makes very good/good/basic/little/insufficient/no use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information Conclusion An excellent Conclusion is presented, but it is beyond the max time limit, so ignored for marking purposes Audio The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to Well paced Very good intonation The narration is well practiced Audio recording quality was very good Video Overall, visual display quality is innovative and excellent The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images The presentation is very well produced Meta-data The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A written description of the presentation is not provided. Providing an informative description can help viewers decide whether they want to watch or not. A link to the book chapter is not provided A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing This presentation has probably violated the copyrights of image owners as images appear to have been used without permission and/or acknowledgement. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:46, 12 November 2022 (UTC)