Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2021/Resentment

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comments[edit source]

Hello!

It could be a good idea to discuss what types of therapy are best for the resentment emotion. Acceptance and commitment therapy would be a great example and I have found an article for you to get more info on it http://www.leaderlabs.asia/uploads/4/7/6/2/4762488/________encyclopedia_of_cognitive_behavior_therapy_social_indicators_research_series.pdf#page=7

--Brianna Meddemmen (discusscontribs) 09:10, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title[edit source]

  1. Title correct
  2. Sub-title incorrect - have fixed it.

User page[edit source]

  1. Created - minimal, but sufficient
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Summarised with direct link(s) to evidence.
  2. 1st edit wasn't really helpful - be carefully playing around with templates (i.e., code that starts with {{)
  3. 2nd edit great

Headings[edit source]

  1. Good, top-level structure.
  2. Room for further development e.g., sub-headings
  3. Avoid having sections with only one sub-heading

Key points[edit source]

  1. Promising plan - is well matched to the topic.
  2. Overview - Consider adding:
    1. an image
    2. an example or case study
  3. Move the references into the References section and provide APA style citations in the main text.
  4. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters.
  5. Consider including more examples/case studies.
  6. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. what might the take-home, practical messages be?
    2. in a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question in the sub-title?

Figure[edit source]

  1. Excellent
  2. A figure is presented.
  3. Caption uses APA style. Italicise Figure X. ...
  4. Caption explains how the image connects to key points being made in the main text.
  5. Cite each figure at least once in the main text.

References[edit source]

  1. OK
  2. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. capitalisation
    2. italicisation
    3. doi formatting
  3. Move non-academic sources into External links

Resources[edit source]

  1. OK
  2. Use bullet-points
  3. Include source in brackets after link

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this chapter does a reasonably good job of applying psychological theory to an important everyday emotion. The main areas for potential improvement are to provide a more indepth review of relevant psychological research, rely less on non-academic sources, and to improve the quality of written expression.
  2. Addressing the topic development feedback could have helped to improve this chapter.
  3. Move non-peer reviewed links into the external links section.
  4. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits.

Overview[edit source]

  1. Well developed Overview.
  2. Excellent case study example.
  3. Resentment is well described, along with related emotions.
  4. Clear focus question(s).
  5. Quality of written expression is OK, but could be improved.

Theory — Breadth[edit source]

  1. Relevant theory is selected, described, and explained.
  2. The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory.

Theory — Depth[edit source]

  1. Reasonable depth is provided about the selected theory(ies).
  2. Many of the suggested steps for overcoming resentment appear to be plagiarised from https://www.marksichel.com/Forgiveness10StepsToLettingGoOfResentment.en.html
  3. Tables and/or lists are used effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information.
  4. Some useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts. An example of someone overcoming resentment would be helpful.
  5. The chapter overuses non-peer-reviewed sources.

Research — Key findings[edit source]

  1. Overall, this chapter makes insufficient use of relevant psychological research.
  2. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.

Research — Critical thinking[edit source]

  1. Critical thinking about research is insufficient.
  2. Some claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags).
  3. Critical thinking about research could be evidenced by:
    1. describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies
    2. discussing the direction of relationships
    3. considering the strength of relationships
    4. suggesting specific directions for future research

Integration[edit source]

  1. The chapter places more emphasis on theory than research.

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. A good conclusion is provided, although it is somewhat basic.

Written expression — Style[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is basic, but sufficient.
    2. "Individuals" is overused. "People" is often a better term than "individuals".
    3. Avoid one sentence paragraphs. A paragraph should typically consist of three to five sentences.
  2. Layout
    1. Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading - use 0 or 2+ sub-headings.
  3. Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are excellent.
  4. APA style
    1. Direct quotes need page numbers.
    2. Figures and tables
      1. Use APA style for Figure captions. See example.
      2. Refer to each Table and Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1).
      3. Figures are very well captioned.
      4. Provide more detailed Figure captions to help connect the figure to the text.
    3. Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example:
      1. Multiple citations in parentheses should be listed in alphabetical order by first author surname.
      2. If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either:
        1. in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or
        2. in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020)
      3. Do not include author first names, initials, or titles.
      4. Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses.
    4. References are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. Check and correct use of capitalisation[1]
      2. "Retrieved from" is not used for APA style 7th ed.
      3. Add spaces between author initials
      4. Formatting of volume and issue numbers
      5. Page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
      6. Include hyperlinked dois
      7. Move non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section
      8. etc.

Written expression — Learning features[edit source]

  1. Overall, the use of learning features is basic.
  2. Basic use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example.
  3. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Basic use of image(s).
  5. No use of table(s).
  6. Very good use of feature box(es) - consider making them wider.
  7. Excellent use of quiz(zes).
  8. Excellent use of case studies or examples.
  9. Format bullet-points for see also and external links per Tutorial 1.

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~4 logged, useful, social contributions with direct links to evidence.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a basic presentation.

Overview[edit source]

  1. The sub-title is missing on the opening slide - this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. Briefly explain why this topic is important.
  3. Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages.

Content[edit source]

  1. Comments about the book chapter also apply to this section.
  2. Ideally, use peer-reviewed sources rather than dictionaries.
  3. The presentation addresses the topic.
  4. Overall, there is too much visual content, in too much detail. Zoom out, summarise, and provide a higher-level presentation.
  5. The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological theory.
  6. The presentation makes no use of relevant psychological research.
  7. The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies.
  8. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information.

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. A Conclusion slide is presented with good take-home message(s).

Audio[edit source]

  1. The presentation makes basic use of narrated audio.
  2. Basic intonation to enhance listener interest and engagement.
  3. The audio communication is hesitant in some places - could benefit from further practice.
  4. Audio recording quality was basic. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard clicks audible). Consider using an external microphone.

Video[edit source]

  1. Overall, visual display quality is basic.
  2. The presentation makes basic use of text-based slides.
  3. Some of the font size should be larger to make it easier to read.
  4. The amount of text presented per slide should be reduced to make it easier to read.
  5. The visual communication could be improved by including some relevant images.
  6. The presentation is basically produced using simple tools.

Meta-data[edit source]

  1. The chapter title but not the sub-title is used in the name of the presentation - the latter would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
  3. Links to and from the book chapter are provided.

Licensing[edit source]

  1. A copyright license for the presentation is provided.
  2. The source details for the image are not provided in clear or clickable format.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:42, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]