Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2021/Malingering motivation

Heading casing

FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 12:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted Capitalisation of the title has been corrected to be consistent with the book table of contents User page Created - minimal, but sufficient Brief description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions. Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading - use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Promising 2-level heading structure - could be improved by concentrating the structure around the motivations for malingering Key points Overview - Consider adding: a description of the problem an image an example or case study What is the prevalence of malingering? What about subclinical malingering? (e.g., doesn't everyone exaggerate their symptoms at some point to gain extra attention, sympathy, time off work etc.?) Excellent use of examples/case studies. However, the Coppola case study needs to be abbreviated. Good emphasis on practical solutions and strategies Key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations Basic development of key points for each section, with relevant citations Use bullet points (see Tutorial 1 - Using Wikiversity) For sections which include sub-section include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Good balance of theory and research Good use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Conclusion (the most important section): well developed emphasise the take-home message in response to the sub-title question what does malingering tell/show us about motivation - why do people malinger? and what can be done about it? Figure Excellent Well done on creating and uploading your own image! Caption explains how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Cite each figure at least once in the main text References Good For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation italicisation separate page numbers by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Resources None provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 12:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Suggestion

Wow! I have just read some of your chapter and can tell there was a lot of effort put in it so far! Just a suggestion which has already been mentioned is sentence casing! Just make sure your headings are correctly formatted so you don't lose marks! Good luck!--U3204694 (discuss • contribs) 06:05, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic presentation. Overview Add and narrate an initial title/sub-title slide, to help the viewer understanding the focus and goal of the presentation. Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest. Establish a context for the topic, to help the viewer understand. Briefly explain why this topic is important. Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. Content The presentation addresses the topic. An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory. The presentation makes little to no use of relevant psychological research. The presentation makes very good use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information. Conclusion The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages. Audio The audio is interesting to listen to. The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio. Audio communication is clear. Perhaps consider longer pauses between sentences. This could help the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point. Very good intonation enhances listener interest and engagement. Audio recording quality was excellent. Video Overall, visual display quality is good. The presentation makes good use of text and image based slides. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read. Consider using a sans-serif typeface to make the text easier to read. The amount of text presented on some slides made it easy to read and listen at the same time. The amount of text presented on some slides could be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time. The presentation is well produced using simple tools. Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) should be used in the name of the presentation - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. Links to and from the book chapter are provided. Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are not provided. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:07, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a solid chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. Well over the maximum word count, hence content beyond 4000 words is ignored for marking purposes. Addressing the topic development feedback could have helped to improve this chapter. There is feedback about the topic development that has been ignored, so it is not repeated in these book chapter comments. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits. Overview Reasonably good Overview. Explains the problem or phenomenon. Clear focus question(s). Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest. Theory — Breadth Relevant theory is well explained. Theory — Depth Excessive depth is provided about the selected theory(ies), contributing to the chapter being over the maximum word count. Some useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts, but these examples could be abbreviated. Place more emphasis on explaining the underlying theoretical constructs than methods of measurement. Research — Key findings Basic overview of relevant research. There is excessive detail about measurement tools - these could be summarised more briefly (e.g., in a table). Greater emphasis on effect sizes, major reviews, and/or meta-analyses would be helpful. Research — Critical thinking Basic critical thinking about research is evident. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Discussion of theory and research is well integrated. Conclusion The Conclusion doesn't fit within the maximum word count. Written expression — Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is good. Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences. Some sentences are overly long; consider splitting them into shorter, separate sentences. Layout See earlier comments about heading casing. Sections which branch into sub-sections should include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections. Grammar Check and make correct use of commas. Check and correct use of semi-colons (;) and colons (:). APA style Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression; use quotation marks only for the first occurrence of the word or phrase, not for subsequent occurrences" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159). Do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc.. Figures Figures are very well captioned. Figure captions should use this format: Figure X. Descriptive caption in sentence casing. See example. Refer to each Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1). Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example: Full-stops should come after citations, not before (e.g., ". (Alozai & McPherson, 2021)" -> " (Alozai & McPherson, 2021)." Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses and "and" outside parentheses. References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[1] Check and correct use of italicisation "Retrieved from" is no longer used (APA style, 7th ed.) Page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Move non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section Written expression — Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is basic. Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. # No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Basic use of image(s). No use of table(s). Good use of feature box(es). No use of quiz(zes). Promising use of case studies or examples. Basic use of interwiki links in the "See also" section. Basic use of external links in the "External links" section. Social contribution ~1 logged social contributions without direct links to evidence, so unable to easily verify and assess.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)