Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey Rani,
I just edited your links to 'gaslighting' and 'antisocial personality disorder' as they were currently linking to wikiversity pages that didn't exist.
The easiest way to do this is to go into source editing, and type:
[ [ w :(wikipedia/versity article, e.g., gaslighting) ] ]
without the spaces. You can add a hashtag at the end to link to a specific section too. E.g.,
[ [ w : gaslighting # In politics| In politics ] ]
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello!
I find your topic quite interesting, as I am sure a lot of people do, and I am excited for it to develop more! The things I noticed that could assist you to enhance your book chapter would be:
- include more interactive content such as case studies and/or quizzes
- include some more images relevant to gaslighting
- maybe hyperlink some interesting videos on the topic? I'm sure there would be quite a few ted talks on this topic
Good luck and I look forward to checking back in soon :)
--U320202303:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is a succint, highly readable explanation of gaslighting from a psychological perspective.
The main area for potential improvement is to provide more detail about the research that has been conducted, even if limited. In fact, that is all the more reason to describe it in more detail.
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits.
Overall, the use of learning features is very good.
Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to.
The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio.
Audio communication is clear and well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
Good intonation enhances listener interest and engagement.
Audio recording quality was excellent.
Mute the music during narration to help the viewer concentrate on the combination of visual information and narrated audio.
The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a version of it) is not used in the name of the presentation - the latter would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.