Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2021/Emotional buying

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Heading casing[edit source]

FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title[edit source]

  1. The title is correctly worded
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted
  3. Capitalisation of the title has been corrected to be consistent with the book table of contents

User page[edit source]

  1. Excellent - used effectively
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Excellent - summarised with direct link(s) to evidence

Headings[edit source]

  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections
  3. Consider adding a heading about to ways to avoid emotional buying

Key points[edit source]

  1. Key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations
  2. Use bullet points (see Tutorial 1 - Using Wikiversity)
  3. Overview - Consider adding:
    1. an image
    2. an example or case study
  4. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters (e.g., there is related chapter being developed about materialism and psychological well-being).
  5. Well done on adding a table
  6. Tables 1 and 2 are overly detailed - summarise
  7. Good balance of theory and research
  8. Good use of examples/case studies
  9. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. promising development

Figure[edit source]

  1. None
  2. Good
  3. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. capitalisation
    2. italicisation
    3. doi formatting
    4. separate page numbers by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
  4. Remember that the goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic.

References[edit source]

No comment

Resources[edit source]

  1. See also
    1. Excellent
  2. External links
    1. Move peer-reviewed articles into References - appears to be https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Impact+of+Store+Environment+on+Impulse+Buying+Behaviour

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit source]

Hi. I think that this is a very topically conversation during COVID especially and am very interested to see your completed chapter. I have added the concept and picture of emotional roller coaster in the mood section. Hope this helps. --U3167879 (discusscontribs) 21:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a solid chapter.
  2. A strength of the chapter is its conversational, practical, applied tone and focus.
  3. The main areas for improvement are:
    1. Address an international, rather than Australian audience.
    2. Use third person perspective, although first and second person perspective can work well for case studies, feature boxes with tips, etc.
  4. Providing more depth about key psychological theories and research.
  5. Addressing the topic development feedback could have helped to improve this chapter.
  6. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits.

Overview[edit source]

  1. Basic Overview.
  2. Internationalise.
  3. Video link is OK; but maybe provide a text-based example and/or image too to help engage reader interest.
  4. Consider developing focus questions to help guide the reader and structure the chapter.

Theory — Breadth[edit source]

  1. A good range of applied theoretical principles are described and illustrated.
  2. The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory.
  3. Excellent emphasis on practical solutions.

Theory — Depth[edit source]

  1. Limited depth is provided about the selected theory(ies).
  2. Some useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts.

Research — Key findings[edit source]

  1. Basic overview of relevant research.
  2. Tables 1 and 2 provide excessive detail - just summarise.
  3. Some claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags).
  4. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.

Research — Critical thinking[edit source]

  1. Insufficient critical thinking about research is evident.
  2. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by:
    1. describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies
    2. discussing the direction of relationships
    3. considering the strength of relationships
    4. acknowledging limitations
    5. suggesting specific directions for future research

Integration[edit source]

  1. Discussion of theory and research is well integrated.

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. Basic summary.
  2. Address the focus questions.
  3. Clear take-home message(s).

Written expression — Style[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is good.
    2. Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead:
      1. it is, most often, not needed at all, or
      2. use section linking.
    3. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes.
    4. Avoid starting sentences with a citation unless the author is particularly pertinent. Instead, it is more interesting for the the content/key point to be communicated, with the citation included along the way or, more typically, in parentheses at the end of the sentence.
    5. Internationalise: Write for an international, rather than domestic, audience (e.g., the Target sales figures are Australian?). Australians make up only 0.32% of the world human population.
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections.
    2. Headings should use default wiki style (e.g., remove additional bold).
    3. See earlier comments about heading casing.
  3. Grammar
    1. The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags). Grammar-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages. Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance.
  4. APA style
    1. Figures and tables
      1. Each Table and Figure is referred to at least once within the main text.
    2. Citations use correct APA style.
    3. References are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. Check and correct use of capitalisation[2]
      2. Check and correct use of italicisation
      3. Page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)

Written expression — Learning features[edit source]

  1. Overall, the use of learning features is very good.
  2. Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. # Excellent use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters.
  3. Basic use of image(s).
  4. Basic use of table(s).
  5. Basic use of feature box(es).
  6. Very good use of quiz(zes).
  7. Good use of case studies or examples.

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~6 logged, useful, minor to major social contributions with direct links to evidence.
  2. This edit, however, was not useful.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a very good presentation.

Overview[edit source]

  1. An opening slide with the title and sub-title is presented - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Also narrate the title and sub-title.
  2. This presentation has a very engaging introduction to hook audience interest .
  3. Briefly explain why this topic is important.
  4. Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages.

Content[edit source]

  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section.
  2. The presentation addresses the topic.
  3. An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little.
  4. For the Faber and Christensen study, what was the comparison group?
  5. The presentation is well structured.
  6. The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological theory.
  7. The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological research.
  8. The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice.
  9. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information.

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. A Conclusion slide is presented with good take-home message(s).
  2. What are the two questions?

Audio[edit source]

  1. The audio is fun and interesting to listen to.
  2. The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio.
  3. Audio communication is reasonable well paced. In some places, it could be helpful to slow down.
  4. Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement.
  5. Audio recording quality was very good.

Video[edit source]

  1. Overall, visual display quality is good.
  2. The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides.
  3. The font size should be larger to make it easier to read.
  4. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams.
  5. The presentation is well produced using simple tools.

Meta-data[edit source]

  1. The chapter title and sub-title are used in the name of the presentation - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. A written description of the presentation is provided.
  3. Links to and from the book chapter are provided.

Licensing[edit source]

  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated.
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:55, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]