Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2021/Developmental changes in emotion regulation

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search


The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title[edit source]

  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted

User page[edit source]

  1. Excellent - used effectively
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Excellent - summarised with direct link(s) to evidence.

Headings[edit source]

  1. Logical, 1-level heading structure.
  2. Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading - use 0 or 2+ sub-headings.

Key points[edit source]

  1. Key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations.
  2. Overview - Consider adding:
    1. an image
    2. an example or case study
  3. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters.
  4. Consider including more examples/case studies.
  5. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. hasn't been developed
    2. what might the take-home, practical messages be?
    3. in a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title?

Figure[edit source]

  1. Excellent

References[edit source]

  1. Very good
  2. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. capitalisation

Resources[edit source]

  1. See also
    1. Excellent
  2. External links
    1. Move academic sources into the References section

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:27, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit source]

Hey there, just fixed a typo and added some hyperlinks to help out, your book chapter looks awesome! [[User:U3187208|U3187208--U3187208 (discusscontribs) 01:21, 17 October 2021 (UTC)]][reply]

Thanks so much! U3187813 (discusscontribs) 11:40, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits.

Overview[edit source]

  1. Well developed Overview.
  2. Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon.
  3. Clear focus question(s).
  4. Consider introducing a case study or example to help engage reader interest.

Theory — Breadth[edit source]

  1. Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained.
  2. The chapter doesn't wander off into discussion of irrelevant theory.

Theory — Depth[edit source]

  1. Excellent depth is provided about the selected theory(ies).

Research — Key findings[edit source]

  1. Relevant research is well reviewed.

Research — Critical thinking[edit source]

  1. Excellent critical thinking about research is evident.

Integration[edit source]

  1. Discussion of theory and research is well integrated.

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. Key points are well summarised.
  2. Add practical, take-home message(s).

Written expression — Style[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is very good.
    2. "People" is often a better term than "individuals".
    3. Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences.
  2. Grammar
    1. Check and correct use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs individuals').[1].
    2. Check and correct use of semi-colons (;) and colons (:).
    3. Abbreviations
      1. Abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e.., etc.) should only be used inside parentheses.
      2. Check and correct grammatical formatting for abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e.., etc.).
      3. Check and correct when to use "that is" (i.e.) and when to use "for example" (e.g.).
  3. APA style
    1. Do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc..
    2. Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression; use quotation marks only for the first occurrence of the word or phrase, not for subsequent occurrences" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159).
    3. Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numerals (e.g., 10).
    4. Direct quotes need page numbers - even better, write in your own words.
    5. Figures and tables
      1. APA style is used for Figure captions.
      2. Each Table and Figure is referred to at least once within the main text.
      3. Figures are very well captioned.
    6. Citations use correct APA style.
    7. References are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. Check and correct use of italicisation
      2. Page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)

Written expression — Learning features[edit source]

  1. Overall, the use of learning features is excellent.
  2. Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. # No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  3. Excellent use of image(s).
  4. No use of table(s).
  5. Excellent use of feature box(es).
  6. Excellent use of quiz(zes).

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~11 logged, useful, minor social contributions with direct links to evidence.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent presentation.

Overview[edit source]

  1. An opening slide with the title is presented and narrated - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. The sub-title is missing on the opening slide - this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  3. The importance of this topic is explained.
  4. Focus questions are presented.

Content[edit source]

  1. The presentation addresses the topic.
  2. An appropriate amount of content is presented.
  3. The presentation is well structured.
  4. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory.
  5. The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological research.
  6. The presentation makes very good use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice.
  7. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information.

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. A Conclusion slide is presented with excellent take-home message(s).

Audio[edit source]

  1. The audio is interesting to listen to.
  2. The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio.
  3. Audio communication is clear.
  4. Consider slowing down and leaving longer pauses between sentences.
  5. Audio recording quality was excellent.

Video[edit source]

  1. Overall, visual display quality is excellent.
  2. The presentation makes effective use of animated slides.
  3. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read.
  4. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images.
  5. The presentation is very well produced.

Meta-data[edit source]

  1. The chapter title is used in the name of the presentation - also try to include a version of the sub-title to help clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. A written description of the presentation is provided.
  3. Links to and from the book chapter are provided.

Licensing[edit source]

  1. Image sources and their copyright status are not provided. Possibly the images come from PowToon, but this isn't explicitly indicated.
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]